Part of
Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive LinguisticsEdited by Wolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisela Redeker and Linda R. Waugh
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 151] 1997
► pp. 205–
Edited by Wolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisela Redeker and Linda R. Waugh
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 151] 1997
► pp. 205–
Speech Act Metonymies
Cited by
Cited by 26 other publications
Baicchi, Annalisa
2015. Conceptual metaphor in the complex dynamics of illocutionary meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 106 ff. 
Baicchi, Annalisa
2017. Chapter 3. How to do things with metonymy in discourse. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 76 ff.
BOWERMAN, JOSEPHINE, INGRID LOSSIUS FALKUM & NAUSICAA POUSCOULOUS
2021. ‘The moustache’ returns: referential metonymy acquisition in adult learners of English as an additional language (EAL). Language and Cognition 13:2 ► pp. 254 ff.
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
2009. Indirect directives in recipes: a cross-linguistic perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5:1
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
2021. Metonymic indeterminacy and metalepsis. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 175 ff.
Chang, Miao-Hsia & Ún-giân Iûnn
2021. A corpus-based study of directives in Taiwanese Southern Min. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 300 ff.
Chen, Wei
2016. A Cognitive Study of Preposition Ellipsis in Radiotelephony Communication. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 06:05 ► pp. 390 ff.
De Clerck, Bernard
2013. Review of Takahashi (2012): A cognitive linguistic analysis of the English imperative. With special reference to Japanese imperatives. Functions of Language 20:1 ► pp. 145 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf & Alexandra Gubina
Ivanová, Martina
2018. Pragmatický Marker Fair Enough A Jeho Prekladové Ekvivalenty V AnglickoSlovenskom Paralelnom Korpuse. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 69:3 ► pp. 395 ff.
Komatsubara, Tetsuta
2019. Cognitive principles underlying predicational metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
Lang, Jun
2018. “I am not criticizing you”. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 9:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2014. Metonymy and the way we speak. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 168 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2017. Chapter 4. The role of inferencing in the interpretation of two expressive speech act constructions. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 109 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2017. Chapter 1. Exploitingwh-questions for expressive purposes. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 18 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2019. Chapter 7. Figurative reasoning in hedged performatives. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 175 ff.
Rydning, Antin Fougner
2009. La démarche de l’expert-traducteur face à un problème de reformulation. Meta 53:4 ► pp. 748 ff.
Tang, Ruiliang
2023. Review of Panther (2022): Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2 ► pp. 488 ff.
Trotzke, Andreas
2023. Non-Canonical Questions,
Tóth, Máté
Van Olmen, Daniël & Simone Heinold
2017. Imperatives and directive strategies from a functional-typological perspective. In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184],
Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona & Maciej Witek
2009. The many faces of speech act theory — editorial to special issue on speech actions. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.