Cover not available
Part of
The Phonetics–Phonology Interface: Representations and methodologies
Edited by Joaquín Romero and María Riera
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 335] 2015
► pp. 125–148

Glottalization at phrase boundaries in Tuscan and Roman Italian

| University of Cologne
Phonological accounts of Italian traditionally exclude glottal consonants from the sound inventory of the language. However, a number of studies have reported creak in vowels in word-final stressed open syllables, suggesting the presence of a following glottal stop. The present study, which features acoustic analysis of read speech from four speakers of Tuscan and Roman Italian, investigates two possible sources of this glottalization: (1) a glottal consonant filling an empty mora posited for final stressed syllables, and (2) prosodic boundary marking. Results show no evidence of a glottal coda — glottalization occurs predominantly at phrase boundaries, with target vowels bearing stress and/or occurring in hiatus showing an increased rate of glottalization. A proposal is made for glottalization as prosodic boundary marking, where it serves to clearly define constituent edges and to block processes signaling cohesion between words, such as raddoppiamento sintattico and vowel coalescence, particularly where there is an intervening phrase boundary.
Published online: 10 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.335.07nap
References (42)
References
Absalom, Matthew & John Hajek. 1997. “Raddoppiamento Sintattico: What happens when the theory is on too tight?” Certamen Phonologicum III: Papers from the Third Cortona Phonology Meeting, Cortona, 12-14 April 1996 ed. by Pier Marco Bertinetto, Livio Gaeta, Giorgi Jetchev & David Michaels, 159-179. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Absalom, Matthew, Mary Stevens & John Hajek. 2003. “A Typology of Spreading, Insertion and Deletion or what you weren’t Told about Raddoppiamento Sintattico in Italian”. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Macquarie University, Sydney, 13-14 July 2002 ed. by Peter Collins & Mengistu Amberber. ([URL]).
Baayen, R. Harald. 2011. languageR: Data sets and functions with “Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics”. R package version 1.1. ([URL]).Google Scholar
Basbøll, Hans. 1989. “Phonological Weight and Italian Raddoppiamento Fonosintattico”. Rivista di Linguistica 1:1.5-31.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler & Ben Bolker. 2011. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-40. ([URL]).Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Michele Loporcaro. 2005. “The Sound Pattern of Standard Italian, as Compared with the Varieties Spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35:2.131-151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blaauw, Eleonora. 1992. “Phonetic Differences between Read and Spontaneous Speech”. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP ’92), Banff, Alta. , Canada, 13-16 October 1992, 751-754.
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2011. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer: Version 5.3.03. ([URL]) (Retrieved on November 22, 2011).Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1986. “Length, Syllabification, and the Phonological Cycle in Italian”. Journal of Italian Linguistics 8.5-34.Google Scholar
Cibelli, Emily. 2015. “The Phonetic Basis of a Phonological Pattern: Depressor effects of prenasalized consonants”. This volume.Google Scholar
Dilley, Laura, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Mari Ostendorf. 1996. “Glottalization of Word-Initial Vowels as a Function of Prosodic Structure”. Journal of Phonetics 24:4.423-444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Imperio, Mariapaola & Barbara Gili Fivela. 2003. “How Many Levels of Phrasing?: Evidence from two varieties of Italian”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Phonetic interpretation ed. by John Local, Richard Ogden & Rosalind Temple, 130-144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D’Imperio, Mariapaola & Sam Rosenthall. 1999. “Phonetics and Phonology of Main Stress in Italian”. Phonology 16:1.1-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile. 2001. “Articulatory Properties of Initial Segments in Several Prosodic Constituents in French”. Journal of Phonetics 29:2.109-135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fourcin, Adrian. 2000. “Voice Quality and Electrolaryngography”. Voice Quality Measurement ed. by Raymond D. Kent & Martin J. Ball, 285-306. San Diego: Singular.Google Scholar
Gerratt, Bruce R. & Jody Kreiman. 2001. “Toward a Taxonomy of Nonmodal Phonation”. Journal of Phonetics 29:4.365-381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Peter Ladefoged. 2001. “Phonation Types: A cross-linguistic overview”. Journal of Phonetics 29:4.383-406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. “Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology”. Linguistic Inquiry 20:2.253-306.Google Scholar
Hayward, Katrina. 2000. Experimental Phonetics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian. 2008. “Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models”. Journal of Memory and Language 59:4.434-446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Klaus J. 1994. “Glottal Stops and Glottalization in German”. Phonetica 51: 1-3.38-51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Linguistic and Paralinguistic Functions of Non-Modal Voice in Connected Speech”. Proceedings of the 5th Seminar on Speech Production: Models and Data , Kloster Seeon, 1-4 May 2000, 121-124.
Krämer, Martin. 2009. The Phonology of Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 1997. L’origine del raddoppiamento fonosintattico. Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
Marasek, Krzysztof. 1997. “EGG & Voice Quality”. Universität Stuttgart. ([URL]).
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & David Talkin. 1992. “Lenition of /h/ and Glottal Stop”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody ed. by Gerard J. Docherty & D. Robert Ladd, 90-117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Price, Patti J., Mari Ostendorf, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Cynthia Fong. 1991. “The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90:6.2956-2970. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. ([URL]).Google Scholar
Redi, Laura & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2001. “Variation in the Realization of Glottalization in Normal Speakers”. Journal of Phonetics 29:4.407-429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Repetti, Lori. 1991. “A Moraic Analysis of Raddoppiamento Fonosintattico ”. Rivista di Linguistica 3:2.307-330.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel. 2003. “On the Rarity of Pre-aspirated Stops”. Journal of Linguistics 39:3.575-598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Mary. 2012. A Phonetic Investigation into “Raddoppiamento sintattico” in Sienese Italian. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stevens, Mary & John Hajek. 2004. “Comparing Voiced and Voiceless Geminates in Sienese Italian: What role does preaspiration play?” Proceedings of the 10th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Macquarie University , Sydney, 8-10 December 2004, 340-345.
. 2005. “Raddoppiamento Sintattico (RS) and Word-Medial Gemination in Italian: Are they the same or are they different? The evidence from spontaneous speech”. Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics ed. by Randall S. Gess & Edward J. Rubin, 257-271. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Blocking of Word-Boundary Consonant Lengthening in Sienese Italian: Some auditory and acoustic evidence”. Proceedings of the 11th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, University of Auckland, 6-8 December 2006, ed. by Paul Warren & Catherine I. Watson, 176-181. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Towards a Phonetic Conspectus of Preaspiration: Acoustic evidence from Sienese Italian”. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 16), Saarbrücken, 6-10 August 2007 ed. by Jürgen Trouvain & William J. Barry, 429-432. Saarbrüken: Univesrität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
Stevens, Mary, John Hajek & Matthew Absalom. 2002. “Raddoppiamento Sintattico and Glottalization Phenomena in Italian: A first phonetic excursus”. Proceedings of the 9th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Canberra , 3-5 December 2002, 154-159. Melbourne: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.
van Santen, Jan & Mariapaola D’Imperio. 1999. “Positional Effects on Stressed Vowel Duration in Standard Italian”. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, 1-7 August 1999 ed. by John J. Ohala, Yoko Hasegawa, Manjari Ohala, Daniel Granville & Ashlee C. Bailey, 241-244. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Vayra, Mario. 1994. “Phonetic Explanations in Phonology: Laryngealization as the case for glottal stops in Italian word-final stressed syllables”. Phonologica 1992: Proceedings of the 7th International Phonology Meeting, Krems an der Donau, 4-9 July 1992 ed. by Wolfgang U. Dressler, Martin Prinzhorn & John R. Rennison, 275-293. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene. 1997. “Prosodic Phonology”. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 58-67. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Svoboda, Michaela & Pavel Šturm
2023. Word-boundary glottalization and its cognitive aspects: A reaction-time study. AUC PHILOLOGICA 2022:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
González, Carolina, Christine Weissglass & Daniel Bates
2022. Creaky Voice and Prosodic Boundaries in Spanish: An Acoustic Study. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Skarnitzl, Radek, Petr Čermák, Pavel Šturm, Zora Obstová & Jan Hricsina
2022. Glottalization and linking in the L2 speech of Czech learners of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese. Second Language Research 38:4 ► pp. 941 ff. DOI logo
Hejná, Míša, Kamil Kaźmierski & Wenyu Guo
2021. Even Americans pre-aspirate. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 42:2 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.