Chapter published in:
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 171198
References

References

Ackermann, Tanja, Horst J. Simon & Christian Zimmer
(eds.) 2018Germanic genitives (Studies in Language Companion Series 193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R. M. W. Dixon
(eds.) 2013Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
2016Competition and the lexicon. In Annibale Elia, Claudio Iacobini & Miriam Voghera (eds), Livelli di Analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia. Atti del XLVII congresso internazionale della società di linguistica italiana (SLI): Fisciano, Salerno 26–28 settembre 2013, 39–51. Roma: Bulzoni Editore.Google Scholar
2019aCanonical syncretism and Chomsky’s S. In Matthew Baerman, Oliver Bond & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Morphological perspectives, 138–147. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2019bCompetitors and alternants in linguistic morphology. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), Competition in inflection and word-formation (Studies in morphology 5), 39–66. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Anna Endresen, Laura A. Janda, Anastasia Makarova & Tore Nesset
2013Making choices in Russian: Pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms. Russian Linguistics 37. 253–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartnicka, Barbara, Björn Hansen, Wojtek Klemm, Volkmar Lehmann & Halina Satkiewicz
2004Grammatik des Polnischen (Slavolinguistica 5). Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Belić, Aleksandar
1932O dvojini u slovenskim jezicima. Belgrade: Srpska kraljevska Akademija.Google Scholar
Billings, Loren A.
1996Sandhi phenomena and language change. In Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.) Interfaces in phonology (Studia Grammatica 41), 60–82. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, David Denison & Alan K. Scott
(eds) 2013Morphosyntactic categories and the expression of possession (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bratishenko, Elena
1998Morphosyntactic variation in possessive constructions and the accusative in Old East Slavic texts. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto dissertation.Google Scholar
2005Denominal adjective formation and suffix hierarchy in Old East Slavic. Slavic and East European Journal 49. 361–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Wayles
1993Serbo-Croat. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic Languages, 306–387. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko
2012Language, identity and borders in the former Serbo-Croatian area. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 33. 219–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Past and current developments involving pluricentric Serbo-Croatian and its official heirs. In Tanneke Schoonheim & Johan Van Hoorde (eds.), Language variation: A factor of increasing complexity and a challenge for language policy within Europe: Contributions to the EFNIL Conference 2018 in Amsterdam, 105–114. Budapest: Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Available at: http://​www​.efnil​.org​/documents​/conference​-publications​/amsterdam​-2018
Carlier, Anne & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
(eds.) 2013The genitive (Case and Grammatical Relations across Languages 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1987The morphology/syntax interface: Evidence from possessive adjectives in Slavonic. Language 63. 299–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Canonical derivational morphology. Word Structure 3. 141–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits. Language 91. 145–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. & Wayles Browne
2018Serbo-Croat: Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin, Serbian. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 3rd edn., 339–356. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Michael
2015Stem initial alternation in Russian third person pronouns: Variation in grammar. In Vladimir P. Selegej (main editor), Komp’juternaja lingvistika i intellektual’nye texnologii: po materialam ežegodnoj Meždunarodnoj konferencii “Dialog” (2015), I, 95–103. Moscow: RGGU.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan & Nicholas Evans
1988Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8. 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne M.
2009A usage-based approach to change: Old Russian possessive constructions. In Johanna Barðdal & Shobhana L. Chelliah (eds.), The role of semantic, pragmatic, and discourse factors in the development of case, 161–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Old Russian possessive constructions: A construction grammar approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Quantifying syntactic influence: Word order, possession and definiteness in Old Church Slavonic and Greek. In Jasmina Grkovic-Major, Björn Hansen & Barbara Sonnenhauser (eds.), Diachronic Slavonic syntax: The interplay between internal development, language contact and metalinguistic factors, 29–61. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne M. & Aleksandrs Berdičevskis
2015Linguistics vs. digital editions: The Tromsø Old Russian and OCS Treebank. Scripta & e-Scripta 14–15. 9–25.Google Scholar
Faßke, Helmut
1981Grammatik der obersorbischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart: Morphologie. Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar
Ferrell, James
1958The systems of the third person pronoun with particular reference to the category of the preposition in Slavic languages. In American Contributions to the Fourth International Congress of Slavists, Moscow, September 1958, 77–102. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Feuillet, Jack
1999Grammaire historique du Bulgare. Paris: Institut d’Études slaves.Google Scholar
Flier, Michael S.
1974Aspects of nominal determination in Old Church Slavic. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor A.
1993Macedonian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 249–305. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco, Franz Rainer & Hans Christian Luschützky
2019Competition in morphology: A historical outline. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), Competition in inflection and word-formation (Studies in morphology 5), 3–36. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graudina, Ljudmila K., Viktor A. Ickovič & Lija P. Katlinskaja
1976Grammatičeskaja pravil’nost’ russkoj reči: opyt častotno-stilističeskogo slovarja variantov. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Guðmundsson, Helgi
1972The pronominal dual in Icelandic (University of Iceland Publications in Linguistics 2). Reykjavík: Institute of Nordic Linguistics.Google Scholar
Herrity, Peter
2000Slovene: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hill, Steven P.
1977The N-factor and Russian prepositions: Their development in 11th-20th century texts. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, David
1984The distribution of the denominative adjective and the adnominal genitive in Old Church Slavonic. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical syntax, 217–236. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Old Church Slavonic. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds) The Slavonic languages, 125–187. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Isačenko, Aleksandr V.
1954Grammatičeskij stroj russkogo jazyka v sopostavlenii s slovackim: Morfologija: I. Bratislava: Izdatel’stvo Slovackoj Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Jakop, Tjaša
2008The dual in Slovene dialects (Diversitas Linguarum 18). Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Janaš, Pětr
1984Niedersorbische Grammatik (2nd edn.). Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A., Tore Nesset & Sergey Say
2019 Prezidentskie vybory vs. vybory prezidenta: How to choose? Russian Linguistics 43. 181–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jentsch, Helmut
1980Die sorbische Mundart von Rodewitz/Spree (Schriftenreihe des Instituts für sorbische Volksforschung in Bautzen 47). Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli & Irina Nevskaya
(eds) 2019Possession in languages of Europe and North-Central Asia (SLCS 206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juge, Matthew L.
2019The sense that suppletion makes: Towards a semantic typology on diachronic principles. Transactions of the Philological Society 117. 390–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2003Possessive noun phrases in the languages of Europe. In Frans Plank (ed.), Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe, 621–722. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kopčevskaja-Tamm, Marija [=Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria] & Aleksej Šmelev
1994Alešina s Mašej stat’ja (o nekotoryx svojstvax russkix pritjažatel’nyx prilagatel’nyx). Scando-Slavica 40. 209–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Křivan, Jan
2019Pronominal and adjectival attributive possession in spoken Czech: A usage-based perspective. In Lars Johanson, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli & Irina Nevskaya (eds.), Possession in languages of Europe and North-Central Asia, 149–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lander, Yury A.
2009Varieties of genitive. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 581–592. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liljegren, Henrik
2016A grammar of Palula (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 8). Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin
1995A proposito dell’alternanza esce, usciva, in italiano. Lingua Nostra 56. 37–41.Google Scholar
Matasović, Ranko
2010Possessive genitives and adjectives from the historical point of view. In Motoki Nomachi (ed.), The Grammar of possessivity in South Slavic languages: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives (Slavic Eurasian Studies 24), 1–12. Hokkaido: Slavic-Eurasian Research Center.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.
1997The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayo, Peter
1993Belorussian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 887–946. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor’ A.
1985Poverxnostnyj sintaksis russkix čislovyx vyraženij. Vienna: Institut für Slawistik der Universität Wien. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minlos, Philip
2012Prenominal and postnominal position of adjective attributes in Old Russian. Russian Linguistics 36. 21–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Andrew Spencer
2013Possession and modification – a perspective from Canonical Typology. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 207–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2020Mixed categories: The morphosyntax of noun modification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Catherine, Joan Maling & Barbora Skarabela
2013Nominal categories and the expression of possession: A cross-linguistic study of probabilistic tendencies and categorical constraints. In Kersti Börjars, David Denison & Alan Scott (eds.), Morphosyntactic categories and the expression of possession, 89–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olander, Thomas
2015Proto-Slavic inflectional morphology: A comparative handbook. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John & Eva Berlage
2014Genitive variation: The niche role of the oblique genitive. English Language and Linguistics 18(2). 331–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Philippova, Tatiana
2018Prepositional repercussions in Russian: Pronouns, comparatives and ellipsis. Beersheba, Israel: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev thesis.Google Scholar
Ponsonnet, Maïa
In preparation. Possession. In Claire Bowern ed. Oxford handbook of Australian languages Oxford Oxford University Press
Priestly, Tom M. S.
1993Slovene. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 388–451. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pugh, Stefan M. & Ian Press
1999Ukrainian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richards, Karen Rondestvedt
1976Toward a history of the possessive in literary Russian: The demise of the possessive adjective. In Sanford B. Steever, Carol A. Walker & Salikoko S. Mufwene (eds.), Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax, 260–273. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette
2014English genitive variation – the state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18(2). 215–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Round, Erich & Greville G. Corbett
2020Comparability and measurement in typological science: The bright future for linguistics. Linguistic Typology 24(3). 489–525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scatton, Ernest A.
1993Bulgarian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 188–248. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmalstieg, William R.
1983An introduction to Old Church Slavic (2nd edn., revised and expanded). Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Scholze, Lenka
2008Das grammatische System der obersorbischen Umgangssprache im Sprachkontakt: mit Grammatiktafeln im Anhang (Schriften des Sorbischen Instituts 45). Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar
Short, David
1993aCzech. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 455–532. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1993bSlovak. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 533–592. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Šmeleva, T. V.
2008Pritjažatel’nye prilagatel’nye: Počemu ne sbyvaetsja vinogradovskij prognoz? In А. Mustajoki, M. V. Kopotev, L. A. Birjulin & E. Ju. Protasova (eds.), Instrumentarij rusistiki: korpusnye podxody (Slavica Helsingiensia 34), 358–371. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
2002Gender as an inflectional category. Journal of Linguistics 38. 279–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Lexical relatedness: A paradigm-based model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Sonja Kettler, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze
2008Split possession: An areal-linguistic study of the alienability correlation and related phenomena in the languages of Europe (Studies in Language Companion Series 101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Gerald
1993Sorbian (Upper and Lower). In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 593–685. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory
2016Inflectional paradigms: Content and form at the syntax-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019An apparently noncanonical pattern of morphotactic competition. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds) Competition in inflection and word-formation (Studies in morphology 5), 259–278. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suprun, Adam E.
1969Slavjanskie čislitel’nye (stanovlenie čislitel’nyx kak osoboj časti reči). Minsk: Belorussian State University.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1925Les formes du duel en slovène. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna
2019aOverabundance in morphology. In Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019bOverabundance: A canonical typology. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.) Competition in inflection and word-formation (Studies in morphology 5), 223–258. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
2004A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S.
1937O pritjažatel’nyx prilagatel’nyx (possessiva) starocerkovno-slavjanskogo jazyka. Zbornik lingvističkih i filoloskih rasprava A. Beliću o četrdesetogodišnjici njegova naučnog rada posvećuju njegovi prijatelji i učenici, 15–20. Belgrade: Mlada Srbija.Google Scholar
Vaillant, André
1964Manuel du vieux slave: I: Grammaire (2nd edn.). Paris: Institut d’Études slaves.Google Scholar
1977Grammaire comparée des langues slaves: V: La syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Večerka, Radoslav
1989Altkirchenslavische (Altbulgarische) Syntax: I: Die lineare Satzorganisation. Freiburg im Breisgau: U.W. Weiher.Google Scholar
Volk, Vitalij S.
2014Sintaksis pritjažatel’nyx mestoimenij i ad’’ektivnja derivacija. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy instituta lingvističeskix issledovanij 2. 510–533: https://​cyberleninka​.ru​/article​/n​/sintaksis​-prityazhatelnyh​-mestoimeniy​-i​-adektivnaya​-derivatsiya
Williams, Edwin
2007Dumping lexicalism. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 353–381. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Žolobov, Oleg F.
1998Symbolik und historische Dynamik des slavischen Duals / Simvolika i istoričeskaja dinamika slavjanskogo dvojstvennogo čisla (Beiträge zur Slavistik 35). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Žolobov, Oleg F. & Vadim B. Krys’ko
2001Dvojstvennoe čislo. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar