Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 31, Bucharest
Edited by Alexandru Nicolae and Adina Dragomirescu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 355] 2021
► pp. 311–334

Cyclicity without containment in Romanian perfects

| Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The Romanian perfect exhibits a form of directional paradigm uniformity: verbal perfect forms adopt the stress and segmental characteristics of the perfect participle. An analysis of this pattern of paradigmatic identity is proposed, which has broader implications for the theory of the phonological cycle.
Keywords: cycle, paradigm uniformity, base-derivative correspondence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Romanian perfects
  • 3.The stress system outside the perfect
  • 4.Perfect correspondence: Accentual evidence
  • 5.Alternatives
  • 6.Containment and the Romanian perfect
    • 6.1Classes of strong perfects and perfect exponents
    • 6.2Perfect correspondence
    • 6.3Excursus: Perfect-infinitive correspondence
  • 7.Base Priority in the perfect and its source
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.355.16ste
References (25)
References
Albright, Adam. 2005. The morphological basis of paradigm leveling. In Laura Downing, T. Alan Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory, 170–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. Base-driven leveling in Yiddish verb paradigms. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(3). 475–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benua, Laura. 1997. Transderivational identity: Phonological relations between words. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Chițoran, Ioana. 2001. The phonology of Romanian: A constraint-based approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Feldstein, Ronald. 1994–1995. Accentul verbului în limba română. Dacoromania 1(1–2). 75–96.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matt. 2002. A factorial typology of quantity insensitive stress. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20(3). 491–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Tracy A. & John H. Scott. 2007. Inflectional paradigms have a base: Evidence from s-dissimilation in southern German dialects. Morphology 17. 151–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds.), MITWPL 30: Papers at the Interface, 425–449. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. 1983. Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: A non-linear analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1998. Base identity and uniform exponence. In Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks (eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, 363–394. Salford: University of Salford.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17.351–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombard, Alf & Constantin Gâdei. 1981. Dictionnaire morphologique de la langue roumaine. Bucharest: Editura Academiei & C.W.K Gleerup.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2005. Optimal paradigms. In Laura Downing, T. Alan Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory, 170–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela (ed.). 2013. The grammar of Romanian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2000. Nonuniformity in English stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17(2). 237–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanton, Juliet & Donca Steriade. Manuscript. Stress and the cycle, in English and elsewhere. MIT, 2018.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1985. Glides and vowels in Romanian. In Claudia Brugman & Monica Macaulay (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 47–64. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
. 1999. Lexical conservatism in French adjectival liaison. In Barbara Bullock, Marc Authier & Lisa Reed (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th meeting of the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 243–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. A pseudo-cyclic effect in Romanian morphophonology. In Asaf Bachrach & Andrew Nevins (eds.), Inflectional identity, 314–359. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. Manuscript. The cycle without containment: Latin perfects. MIT, 2013.Google Scholar
. 2016. The morpheme vs. similarity-based syncretism: Latin t-stem derivatives. In Ana Luís & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (eds.), The morphome debate, 112–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasiliu, Emanuel. 1965. Fonologia limbii române. Bucharest: Editura Științifică.Google Scholar
Wolf, Matthew. 2008. Optimal interleaving: Serial phonology-morphology interaction in a constraint-based model. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Zafiu, Rodica. 2013. Mood, tense and aspect. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), The grammar of Romanian, 24–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zukoff, Samuel. 2015. Stress Restricts reduplication. Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology 2014. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Steriade, Donca
2023. Priscianic Word Formation. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.