Chapter published in:
Language and Text: Data, models, information and applications
Edited by Adam Pawłowski, Jan Mačutek, Sheila Embleton and George Mikros
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 356] 2021
► pp. 93108
References
Ágel, Vilmos
2000Valenztheorie (Narr-Studienbücher). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Altmann, Gabriel
1978Towards a theory of language. In Gabriel Altmann (ed.), Glottometrika 1 (Quantitative Linguistics 1), 1–25. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Baker, Collin F., Charles J. Fillmore & Beau Cronin
2003The structure of the FrameNet database. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3). 281–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emons, Rudolf
1978Valenzgrammatik für das Englische: Eine Einführung (Anglistische Arbeitshefte 16). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Peter
1988On the principle of ‘weight’ in English. In Caroline Duncan-Rose (ed.), On language: Rhetorica, phonologica, syntactica; a festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell from his friends and colleagues, 325–339. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968The case for case. In Emmon W. Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (A Holt international edition), 1–88. London: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
1985Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2). 222–254.Google Scholar
2007Valency issues in FrameNet. In Thomas Herbst & Katrin Götz-Votteler (eds.), Valency: Theoretical, descriptive and cognitive issues (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 187), 129–160. Berlin: de Gruyter. Reprint 2008 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Christopher R. Johnson & Miriam N. L. Petruck
2003Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3). 235–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas
2003Was soll zum Beispiel eine obligatorische Ergänzung sein? Oder ein zweivalentes Verb? – Zur Interdependenz valenzpolitischer Festlegungen. In Alan Cornell, Klaus Fischer & Ian F. Roe (eds.), Valency in practice – Valenz in der Praxis, 65–88. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas & Susen Schüller
2008Introduction to syntactic analysis: A valency approach (Narr-Studienbücher). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1936Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. In Praský linguistický krouek (ed.), Études dédiées au quatrième congrès de linguistes (Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 6), 240–288. Prague: Jednota eskoslovenských matematiku a fysik. Reprint 1971 In Roman Jakobson (ed.), Word and language (Selected Writings II), 23–71. The Hague: Mouton. Reprint 2010 Tübingen: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984Contribution to the general theory of case: General meanings of the Russian cases. In Roman Jakobson (ed.), Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981 (Janua Linguarum. Series Maior 106), 59–103. Berlin: de Gruyter. Crossref. [Translation of Jakobson 1936].Google Scholar
Jiang, Jingyang & Haitao Liu
2018Quantitative analysis of dependency structures (Quantitative Linguistics 71). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, Reinhard
1986Zur linguistischen Synergetik: Struktur und Dynamik der Lexik (Quantitative Linguistics 31). Bochum: Studienverlag Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
1987System theoretical linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 4(2/3). 241–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Synergetic linguistics. In Reinhard Köhler, Gabriel Altmann & Rajmund Genrikhovich Piotrowski (eds.), Quantitative Linguistik – Quantitative Linguistics: Ein internationales Handbuch – An International Handbook (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft – Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 27), 760–774. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Quantitative syntax analysis (Quantitative Linguistics 65). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Hovav Rappaport
2005Argument realization (Research Surveys in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lichte, Timm
2015Syntax und Valenz: Zur Modellierung kohärenter und elliptischer Strukturen mit Baumadjunktionsgrammatiken (Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax 1). Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Myriam R. L. Petruck, Christopher R. Johnson, Collin Baker & Jan Scheffczyk
2016Framenet II: extended theory and practice. Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute. https://​framenet2​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu​/docs​/r1​.7​/book​.pdf
Somers, Harold L.
1984On the validity of the complement-adjunct distinction in valency grammar. Linguistics 22(4). 507–530. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987Valency and case in computational linguistics (Edinburgh information technology series 3). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Petra
2013Diversification of English valency patterns. In Reinhard Köhler & Gabriel Altmann (eds.), Issues in quantitative linguistics 3 (Studies in Quantitative Linguistics 5), 369–391. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.Google Scholar
Storrer, Angelika
1992Verbvalenz: Theoretische und methodische Grundlagen ihrer Beschreibung in Grammatikographie und Lexikographie (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 126). Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1953Esquisse d’une syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1959Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1965Éléments de syntaxe structurale (2nd edn.). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
2015Elements of structural syntax. Translated by Sylvain Kahane & Timothy John Osborne. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref. [Translation of Tesnière 1965].Google Scholar