Chapter published in:
Language and Text: Data, models, information and applications
Edited by Adam Pawłowski, Jan Mačutek, Sheila Embleton and George Mikros
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 356] 2021
► pp. 109120
References
Anttila, Raimo
1972An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dassow, Jürgen & Gheorghe Păun
1989Regulated rewriting in formal language theory. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1992Parts of speech. In Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder & Lars Kristoffersen (eds.), Layered structure and reference in functional perspective, 29–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Eva van Lier
2008Parts of speech and dependent clauses in Functional Discourse Grammar. Studies in Language 32. 753–785. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010An implicational map of parts of speech. Linguistic Discovery 8. 129–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, Jan Rijkhoff & Anna Siewierska
2004Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics 40. 527–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Sterre Leufkens
2018Transparent and non-transparent languages. Folia Linguistica 52. 139–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2008Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 23–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vulanović, Relja
2003Grammar efficiency and complexity. Grammars 6. 127–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007On measuring language complexity as relative to the conveyed linguistic information. SKY Journal of Linguistics 20. 399–427.Google Scholar
2008A mathematical analysis of parts-of-speech systems. Glottometrics 17. 51–65.Google Scholar
2009Efficiency of flexible parts-of-speech systems. In Reinhard Köhler (ed.), Issues in quantitative linguistics ( Studies in quantitative linguistics 5), 136–157. Lüdenscheid: RAM.Google Scholar
Vulanović, Relja & Oliver Ruff
2018Measuring the degree of violation of the One-Meaning–One-Form Principle. In Lu Wang, Reinhard Köhler & Arjuna Tuzzi (eds.), Structure, function and process in texts, 67–77. Lüdenscheid: RAM.Google Scholar