Grammatical prototypes and competing motivations in a theory of linguistic change

Kemmer, Suzanne

doi:10.1075/cilt.84.10kem

Part of

Explanation in Historical Linguistics
Edited by Garry W. Davis and Gregory Iverson
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 84] 1992
► pp. 145–166

Grammatical prototypes and competing motivations in a theory of linguistic change

Suzanne Kemmer

Published online: 15 October 1992

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.84.10kem

Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Order by:

Divjak, Dagmar, Natalia Levshina & Jane Klavan

2016. “Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward”. Cognitive Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 447 ff.

PETRÉ, PETER

2016. Grammaticalization by changing co-text frequencies, or why [BE Ving] became the ‘progressive’. English Language and Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

PETRÉ, PETER

2017. Connecting the past and the present – a response to Pentrel. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 283 ff.

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott

2003. Grammaticalization,

Kihm, Alain

2000. Review of Véronique (1996): Matériaux pour l’étude des classes grammaticales dans les langues créoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 15:1 ► pp. 225 ff.

[no author supplied]

2019. Patient-Subject Constructions in Mandarin Chinese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 12],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.