Article published in:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 11:1 (2020) ► pp. 84106

Full-text

Non-canonical passives in Chinese
References

References

Au, Terry Kit-Fong
1983 “Chinese and English Counterfactuals: The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Revisited”. Cognition, 15: 155–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984 “Counterfactuals: In Reply to Alfred Bloom”. Cognition, 17: 289–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bezuidenhout, Anne
2004 “Procedural Meaning and the Semantics/pragmatics Interface.” In The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction, ed. by Bianchi Claudia, 101–131. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1989 “Denial and Contrast: A Relevance-theoretic Analysis of but .” Linguistics and Philosophy, 12: 15–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “Indicators and Procedures: nevertheless and but .” Journal of Linguistics, 36: 463–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Alfred H.
1981The Linguistic Shaping of Thought: A Study in the Impact of Language on Thinking in China and the West. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2007Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2016 “The Heterogeneity of Procedural Meaning.” Lingua, 175–176: 154–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 104 ]
Chappell, Hillary, and Dingxu Shi
2016 “Major Non-canonical Clause Types: Ba and Bei .” In A Reference Grammar of Chinese, ed. by Chu-ren Huang, & Dingxu Shi, 451–482. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Wenbo
2010 “Hanyu Xinxing ‘Bei+X’ Jiegou de Yuyi Renzhi Jiedu [Cognitive and Semantic Construal of the New Kind of ‘Bei+X’ Construction].” Dangdai Xiucixue [Contemporary Rhetoric], 4: 80–87.Google Scholar
Chen, Xinren
2017 “Extensions of the Chinese Passive Construction: A Memetic Account.” East Asian Pragmatics, 2: 59–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, Seana
2005 “Sarcasm and the Space Structuring Model.” In The Literal and the Non-literal in Language and Thought, ed. by Seana Coulson, & Barbara Lewandowska-Tomasczyk, 9–22. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
1998Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012The Language of Stories: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Eve Sweetser
2005Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
1998 “Conceptual Integration Networks.” Cognitive Science, 22: 133–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel
1995 “On Irony and Negation.” Discourse Processes, 19: 239–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Alison
2007 “Do Discourse Connectives Encode Concepts or Procedures?Lingua, 117: 149–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, and Na Liu
2014 “Xinxing Feidianxing Beidongshi ‘Bei XX’ de Jufa Yuyi Jiegou [The Syntax and Semantics of the New Non-canonical Bei XX Construction].” Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences], 5: 225–241.Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
2017 “What Are They Good for? A Constructionist Account of Counterfactuals in Ordinary Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics, 113: 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 105 ]
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo, and Ting Jing
2011 “Embodied Semantics and Pragmatics: Empathy, Sympathy and Two Passive Constructions in Chinese Media Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics, 43: 2826–2844. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1993 “Reference-point Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics, 4:1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Lisa Garbern
1985 “Reasoning Counterfactually in Chinese: Are There any Obstacles?Cognition, 21: 239–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan
2010 “Shishuo xinyu Sanze Pingshuo: Bei-Zisha, Xixiao-gongzuo, You-haojiu [Comments on Three New Popular Expressions in Current Chinese – Bei-zisha, Xixiao-gongzuo, You-haojiu ].” Dangdai Xiucixue [Contemporary Rhetoric], 4: 93–95.Google Scholar
Shi, Chunhong
2013 “Xin ‘Bei’ ziju de Shengcheng Jizhi, Yuyi Lijie ji Yuyong Xiaoying [The Generative Mechanism, Semantic Interpretation and Pragmatic Effect of New Bei Passive Constructions].” Dangdai Xiucixue [Contemporary Rhetoric], 1: 12–28.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, John
1996Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Yin
2011 “ ‘Xin BeiZi Goushi’ de Cihui Yazhi Jiexi: Dui ‘Bei Ziyuan’ Yilei XinBiaoda de Renzhi Goushi Yufa Yanjiu [Analysis of ‘New Construction with ‘Bei’’ via Lexical Coercion: A Research on ‘Bei Ziyuan’ in Cognitive Construction Grammar].” Waiguoyu [Journal of Foreign Languages], 3: 13–20.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2011 “The Conceptual–Procedural Distinction: Past, Present, Future.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. By Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 3–31. West Yorkshire: Emerald Group Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Reassessing the Conceptual–procedural Distinction.” Lingua, 175–176: 5–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
1992 “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua, 87: 53–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, Xueliang, and Ling He
2012 “Chuyi BeiZi Xinyong [Towards a Novel Use of bei in Chinese].” Jiefangjun Waiguoyu Xueyuan Xuebao [Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages], 5: 1–4.Google Scholar
Yao, Jun, Jie Song, and Michael Singh
2013 “The Ironical Chinese bei-construction and its Accessibility to English Speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics, 55: 195–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yong, Qian
2016 “A Corpus-based Study of Counterfactuals in Mandarin.” Language and Linguistics, 17: 891–915. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Hongmei, & Jingyu Liang
2016 “ ‘Bei+X’ Goushiyi de Gainian Zhenghe Fenxi [A Conceptual Integration Analysis of the Constructional Meanings of “Bei+X” Construction].” Waiyu Yanjiu [Foreign Languages Research], 1: 33–39.Google Scholar
[ p. 106 ]
Yuan, Yulin
2015 “Hanyu Fanshishi Biaoda jiqi Siwei Tedian [Counterfactual Expressions in Chinese and the Distinctive Thinking They Reflect].” Zhongguo Shehui Kexue [Social Sciences in China], 8: 126–144.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2000 “On Reaching the Intended Ironic Interpretation.” International Journal of Communication, 10: 27–78.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jianli, and Junwei Zhu
2010 “Bei XX Ju de Goushi yufa Tantao [A Construction Grammar Approach to “bei XX” Structure].” Hangzhou Shifan Daxue Xuebao [Journal of Hangzhou Normal University], 5: 120–128.Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander
2014Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse: Theoretical Foundations and Descriptive Applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar