Chapter published in:
Language, Culture and Identity – Signs of Life
Edited by Vera da Silva Sinha, Ana Moreno-Núñez and Zhen Tian
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 13] 2020
► pp. 75109


Ariel, Mira
1988 “Referring and accessibility.” Journal Linguisitics 24: 65–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1993Toward a Philosophy of the Act. (M. Holquist and V. Liapunov, eds.). Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934Sprachtheorie. Die Dahrstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Tara, Moll, Henrike, Rakoczy, Hannes, Warneken, Felix, Liszkowski, Ulf, Behne, Tanya and Tomasello, Michael
2011Early Social Cognition in Three Cultural Contexts. Boston/Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1974 “Language and consciousness.” Language 50 (1): 111–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Discourse, consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2005 “Three Factors in Language Design.” LinguisticInquiry 36 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Coate, Howard H. J., and Oates, Lynette Frances
1970A Grammar of Ngarinjin, Western Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
2016 “Concluding remarks: Why viewpoint matters.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen (eds.), 281–288. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dor, Daniel
2015The Instruction of Imagination: Language as a Social Communication Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “From experience to imagination: Language and its evolution as a social communication technology.” Journal Neurolinguistics.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1987 “The Discourse Basis of Ergativity.” Language 63 (4): 805–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “The stance triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse. Robert Englebretson (ed), 139–182. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay, and Hodge, Gabrielle
2018 “Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.” Frontiers Psychology 9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara
1987 “Anaphora in popular written English narratives.” In Coherence and grounding in discourse, Russell S. Tomlin (ed), 157–174. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration. Discourse Studies 9 (3): 299–318.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam and Östman, Jan-Ola
2004 “Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch.” In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective. Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), 11–86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gijn, Rik van
2016 “Switch reference: An overview.” In Switch Reference 2.0. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: a Construction Grammar approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009 “The nature of generalization in language.” CognitiveLinguistics 20 (1): 93–127.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Hasan, Ruqaia
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees and Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
1998 “Documentary and descriptive linguistics.” Journal Linguistics 36: 161–195.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme
(eds.) 2013The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1980The framework of language. Michigan: Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies.Google Scholar
Kaminski, Juliane, Call, Josep and Tomasello, Michael
2008 “Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe.” Cognition 109: 224–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A.
1999 “Reference and working memory cognitive inferences from discourse observations.” In Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics. Karen Van Hoek, Andrej A. Kibrik and Leo Noordman (eds.), 29–52. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Reference in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2009 “Cognitive (Construction) Grammar.” CognitiveLinguistics 20 (1): 167–176.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B.
2002Verb classification in Australian languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Optionality in grammar and language use.” Linguistics 51 (6): 1147–1204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B. and Rumsey, Alan
2009Worrorran Revisited. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mercier, Hugo and Sperber, Dan
2011 “Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.” Behavioral brain sciences 34: 57–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017The Enigma of Reason. Harvard: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merrell, Floyd
2001 “Charles Sanders Peirce’s Concept of the Sign.” In The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics, Paul Cobley (ed), 28–39. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moll, Henrike, Carpenter, Malinda and Tomasello, Michael
2014 “Two- and 3-Year-Olds Know What Others Have and Have Not Heard.” Journal Cognition Development, 15 (1): 12–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Joanna
1986Head-marking and dependent-marking languages. Language 62: 524–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R.
1987Amele. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1975 “Cognitive representations of semantic categories.” Journal Experimental Psychology: General 104: 192–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, R. Shayna, Stuss, Donald T., Levine, Brian, and Tulving, Endel
2007 “Theory of mind is independent of episodic memory.” Science 318: 1257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rumsey, Alan
1982An Intra-Sentence Grammar of Ungarinjin, North-Western Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(eds.) 2001Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 “Hierarchy of features and ergativity.” In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Robert M. W. Dixon (ed), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Spronck, Stef.
2020Grammar and levels of addressivity: Exploring Ungarinyin engagement. Open Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spronck, Stef
2015Reported speech in Ungarinyin: grammar and social cognition in a language of the Kimberley region, Western Australia. The Australian National University. Available at http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/1885​/733712596
Stirling, Lesley
1993Switch-reference and discourse representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2014aA Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b “The ultra-social animal.” European Journal Social Psychology 44: 187–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010 “(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristine Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), 29–71. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr. Robert D. and LaPolla, Randi J.
1997Syntax: structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Spronck, Stef
2020. Grammar and levels of addressivity. Open Linguistics 6:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.