Article published in:
Transcategoriality: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Danh Thành Do-Hurinville and Huy Linh Dao
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:1] 2018
► pp. 133154
References
Beck, U.
(2010) A God of one’s own. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bible Gateway (King James Version)
Cameron, L.
(2011) Metaphor and reconciliation: The discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict conversations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.
(2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, L.
(1980) The language of “born-again” Christianity. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society (pp. 133–142). Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Douglas, M.
(1993) In the wilderness: The doctrine of defilement in the book of numbers. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1966) Purity and Danger: An analysis of the concept of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge Classics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.
(2002) Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm. The Linguistic Society of Korea. (pp. 111–138). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Geertz, C.
(1993) Religion as a cultural system. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (pp. 87–125). London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. & Bowdle, B. F.
(2001) Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3), 223–247.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr., R. W.
(2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr., R. W. & Colston, H. L.
(2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S.
(2008) How metaphors create categories – quickly. In Gibbs, Jr. R. W. (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, T.
(2012) Modern Thai Buddhism and Buddhad as a Bhikkhu. Singapore: National University of Singapore. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, L. H.
(2016) Critical metaphor analysis of cosmetics metaphorical advertising slogans. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 3(1), 134–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinnvall, C. and Nesbitt-Larking, P.
(2011) The political psychology of globalization: Muslims in the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Language, mind, and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) The biblical story retold: A cognitive linguistic perspective. In M. Brdar, S. T. Gries, & Fuchs, M. Z. (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics. Convergence and expansion (pp. 325–353). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Where metaphors come from. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, J.
(2012) The truth about grace. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
(2008) The truth war: Fighting for certainty in an age of deception. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Macmillan Dictionary
Pihlaja, S.
(2014) Antagonism on YouTube: Metaphor in online discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, P.
(2017) An investigation of the blocking and development of empathy in discussions with Muslim and Christian believers. Metaphor and the Social World, 7 (1), 46–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) A closer walk: A study of the interaction between metaphors related to movement and proximity and presuppositions about the reality of belief in Christian and Muslim testimonials. Metaphor and the Social World, 2 (2), 233–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P.
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Semino, E., Deignan, A. & Littlemore, J.
(2013) Metaphor, genre and recontexualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 (1), 41–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silvestre-López, A. J. & Navarro iFerrando, I.
(2017) Metaphors in the conceptualization of meditative practices. Metaphor and the Social World, 7(1), 26–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P.
(2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
(2003) Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu
(2014) Dhamma talks 6 (ebook version). California: Meta Forest Monastery. Retrieved from dhammatalks.org.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Kang, Byongchang
2018. Unifying Opposites through Metaphor: A Cognitive Approach to the Buddhist Metaphors for the Mind in the Awakening of Faith Discourse. Religions 9:11  pp. 345 ff. Crossref logo
RICHARDSON, PETER & CHARLES M. MUELLER
2019. Moving yet being still: exploring source domain reversal and force in explanations of enlightenment. Language and Cognition 11:2  pp. 310 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.