Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 6:1 (2019) ► pp.158–184

A metaphor-based account of semantic relations among proverbs

| Cadi Ayyad University

The paper deals with semantic relations in the field of proverbs from the standpoint of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Our main claim is that proverb understanding is conceptually complex, involving many construal operations, namely metaphor. Metaphor is assumed to play a crucial role in framing and relating proverbs to one another via various semantic relationships. Three semantic relations will be highlighted: synonymy, antonymy and polysemy. Synonymous proverbs will be shown to be structured by similar metaphors, whereas antonymous proverbs by contradictory metaphors. As regards polysemous proverbs, our focus will be on a specific polysemy, consisting of contradictory meanings. Overall, we will attempt to build a cognitive model for proverbs semantic relationships, based on three main assumptions: first, proverbs have relatively stable meaning. Second, rather than sharply distinct, conventionalized meaning and contextual meaning of proverbs form a continuum, residing in their common conceptual base. Third, such a common conceptual base is metaphor-dependent.

Keywords: proverb, semantic relations, conceptual metaphor, metaphorical pluralism, frame
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology and semantic characterization of proverbs
    • 2.1A methodological issue
    • 2.2A relatively stable meaning for proverbs
    • 2.3Three levels of meaning for proverbs
  • 3.How conceptual metaphors frame semantic relations among proverbs
    • 3.1Synonymy and antonymy among proverbs
      • 3.1.1Intra-linguistic synonymy
      • 3.1.2Cross-linguistic synonymy
      • 3.1.3Antonymy, the other side of the coin
    • 3.2Variant forms of proverbs: Elucidating a confusion
    • 3.3Polysemous proverbs: A case study
  • 4.The frame of appearance as a metaphoric network
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00034.lem
References
Alverson, H.
(1994) Semantics and experience: Universal metaphors of time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, R., & Byrne, D.
(1981) Social psychology: Understanding human behaviour. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Callies, M.
(2017) ‘Idioms in the making’ and variation in conceptual metaphor. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 63–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cram, D.
(1994) The linguistic status of the proverb. In W. Mieder (Ed.), Wise words: Essays on the proverb (pp. 73–98). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
DeHaene, S.
(2009) Reading in the brain. New York: Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Beitel, D.
(1995) What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 133–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., Strom, L., & Spivey-Knowlton, M.
(1997) Conceptual metaphors in mental imagery for proverbs. Journal of Mental Imagery, 211, 83–110.Google Scholar
Feldman, J.
(2006) From molecule to metaphor. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, C. J., & Narayanan, S.
(2004) Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2), 385–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T.
(1992) Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 75–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Furnham, A.
(1987) The proverbial truth: Contextually reconciling and the truthfulness of antonymous Proverbs. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11, 49–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Handl, S., & Schmid, H.-J.
(Eds.) (2011) Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honeck, R. P.
(1997) A proverb in mind: The cognitive science of proverbial wit and wisdom. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, R.
(1958) Post-tetanic Potentiation. Physiological Reviews, 11, 91–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B.
(1973) Toward a theory of proverb meaning. Proverbium, 221, 821–827.Google Scholar
(1988) The language of love: The semantics of passion in conversational English. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Emotion concepts. Berlin/New York: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction, 2nd edition . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2015a) Surprise as a conceptual category. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 131, 270–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Where metaphors come from: reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition (pp 202–251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
(2013) Neural social science. In D. Franks & J. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of neurosociology (pp. 9–25). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Language and emotion. Emotion Review, 31, 269–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites, vol. 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemghari, E.
(2017) Conceptual metaphors as motivation for proverbs lexical polysemy. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 31, 57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucek, S.
(2017) Metaphor variation of spatial conceptualizations in Irish English. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 36–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manser, M.
(2007) The facts on file dictionary of proverbs: Meanings and origins of more than 1,700 popular sayings, 2nd edition . New York: Infobase Publishing.Google Scholar
Milner, G. B.
(1969) What is a proverb? New Society, 3321, 199–2002.Google Scholar
Narayanan, S.
(1997) Embodiment in language understanding: Sensory-motor representations for metaphoric reasoning about event descriptions (Doctoral thesis). Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Obelkevich, J.
(1987) Proverbs and social history. In P. Burk & R. Porter (Eds.), The social history of language (pp. 43–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parades, A.
(1970) Proverbs and ethnic stereotypes. Proverbium, 151, 505–507.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M.
(1979) The conduit metaphor – a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 228–324). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, F.
(2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 109–132). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schubert, T. W.
(2005) Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 891, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F., Yu, N., Dirven, R., & Niemeier, S.
(Eds.) (2008) Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teigen, K.
(1986) Old truths or fresh insights? A study of students’ evaluations of proverbs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 251, 43–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, G. M.
(1987) Proverbs and cultural models: An American psychology of problem solving. In D. Holland, & N. Quinn, (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 151–172). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yankah, K.
(1984) Do proverbs contradict? Folklore Forum, 171, 2–19.Google Scholar
Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K.
(2006) Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing”. Science, 3131, 1451–1452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C.-B., & Leonardelli, G.
(2008) Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 91, 838–842. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Lemghari, El Mustapha
2021. Metaphorical blending in complex proverbs. Metaphor and the Social World 11:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2021. Constructing a Broad Model for Proverb Understanding. Metaphor and Symbol 36:4 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Tamimy, Mohammad & Rahman Sahragard
2021. Americans’ cultural attitudes to group work: Insights from the proverbs. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT 9:3 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.