Article published in:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 2:2 (2015) ► pp. 181204


Albright, A., & Hayes, B.
(2003) Rules vs. Analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90, 119–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C., & McCarthy, J.
(1981).The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A.
(1990) Human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
(1984) The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 173–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D.
(1975) Aspects of language. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M.
(1988) The “no negative evidence” problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In J. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp.73–101). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bredart, S., & Rondal, J.A.
(1999) L’analyse du langage chez l’enfant. Sprimont, Belgium: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Brown, R.
(1973) A first language.The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Z., Pickering, M., & Branigan, H.
(2012) Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 833–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D.
(1992) Language structure processing and disorders. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, D.
(2008) Psychology of language. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1970) Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1957) Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
(1966) Cartesian linguistics. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
(1971) Problems of knowledge and freedom. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Cleeremans, A.
(1994) Awareness and abstraction are graded dimensions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 402–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costermans, J.
(1980) Psychologie du langage. Brussels: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Cramer, P.
(1968) Word association. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, S., Conrad, N., & Pacton, S.
(2008) A statistical learning perspective on children’s learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology, 49, 118–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, G.
(1997) Assessment of perinatal pathologies in premature neonates using a syllable discrimination task. Biology of the Neonate, 71, 299–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Cerebral specialization for speech and non-speech stimuli in infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 449–460. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dehaene, S., & Hertz-Pannier, L.
(2002) Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science, 298, 2013–2015. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey, P.
(1997) An anatomically structured sensory-motor sequence learning system displays some general linguistic capacities. Brain and Language, 59, 50–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey, P., Hoen, M., Blanc, J., & Lelekov-Boissard, T.
(2003).Neurological basis of language and sequential cognition: Evidence from simulation, aphasia, and ERP studies. Brain and Language, 86, 207–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey, P., Inui, T., & Hoen, M.
(2009) Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing. Brain and Language, 109, 80–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkettt, K.
(1997) Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Everett, D.
(2008) Don’t sleep, there are snakes. Life and language in the Amazonian jungle. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Fetzer, A.
(2004) Recontextualizing context: Grammaticality meets appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.
(1966) How to learn to talk: Some simple ways. In F. Smith & G. Miller (Eds.), The genesis of language (pp. 105–128). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S., & Baddeley, A.
(1993).Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M.
(2008).Human. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Gervain, J., & Erra, R.
(2012) The statistical signature of morphosyntax: A study of Hungarian and Italian infant-directed speech. Cognition, 125, 263–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gervain, J., & Werker, J.
(2013) Learning non-adjacent regularities at age 0; 7. Journal of Child Language, 40, 860–872. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gold, M.
(1967) Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 16, 447–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, R., & Gerken, L.
(1999) Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70, 109–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000).Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 178–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hagege, C.
(1985) L’homme de parole. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Hassin, R., Bargh, J., Engell, A., & McCulloch, K.
(2009).Implicit working memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(3), 665–678. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hochmann, J., Endress, A., & Mehler, J.
(2010).Word frequency as a cue for identifying function words in infancy. Cognition, 115, 444–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, A., Chater, N., & Vitànyi, P.
(2011).The probabilistic analysis of language acquisition: Theoretical, computational, and experimental analysis. Cognition, 120, 380–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, E.
(2005) In search of memory. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Koulaguina, E., & Shi, R.
(2013).Abstract rule learning in 11 and 14 months-old infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 71–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, K.
(1996) Smooth talkers. The linguistic performance of auctionneers and sportcasters. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kurzwiel, R.
(2006) The singularity is near. When human transcend biology. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Lahey, M., Liebergott, J., Chesnick, M., Menyuk, P., & Adams, J.
(1992).Variability in children’s use of grammatical morphemes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 373–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C., Fisher, S., Hurst, J., Vargha-Khadem, F., & Monaco, A.
(2001) A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature, 413, 519–523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1971) Presupposition and relative well-formedness. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (pp. 329–340). New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Levelt, W.
(1974, 2008) Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1999).Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In A. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, C., & Schütze, H.
(1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G.
(1993) Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46, 53–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., & Vishton, P.
(1999) Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R., Crowther, J., Knight, M., Tamborello, F., & Yang, C.
(2010) Planning in sentence production: Evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope. Cognition, 116, 177–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Hinojosa, J., Carretié, L., Munoz, F., & Pozo, M.
(2005) Higher-order activity beyond the word level: Cortical dynamics of simple transitive sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 92, 332–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCleland, J., & Rumelhart, D.
(Eds.) (1986) Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mehler, J., & Dupoux, E.
(1990) Naître humain. Paris: Jacob.Google Scholar
Milner, J.C.
(1989) Introduction à une science du langage. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Misson, J.P., & Evrard, P.
(2009) Développement normal et pathologique du néocortex cérébral. In M. Poncelet, S. Majerus, & M. Van Der Linden (Eds.), Traité de neuropsychologie de l’enfant (pp. 29–62). Marseille, France: Solal.Google Scholar
Moerk, E.
(1980) Relationships between parental input frequencies and children’s language acquisition: A reanalysis of Brown’s data. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 105–118.Google Scholar
(1983) The mother of Eve as a first-language teacher. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(2000) The guided acquisition of first language skills. Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Murphy, K., McKone, E., & Slee, J.
(2003) Dissociations between implicit and explicit memory in children: The role of strategic processing and the knowledge base. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 124–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J.
(1998) Language discrimination by newborns: Towards an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Jusczyk, P., & Johnson, E.
(2000) Language discrimination by English-learning 5-month-olds: Effect of rhythm and familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Onnis, L, Waterfall, H., Edelman, S.
(2008) Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues. Cognition, 109, 423–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., Kim, A., & Kuperberg, G.
(2012).The neurobiology of sentence comprehension. In M. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 365–389). Cambridge, UK: CUP Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P.
(2005).Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76, 324–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A.
(2001) Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M.
(2000).Awareness of observable input and output - not of linguistic competence. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Language Awareness , University of Odense, Denmark.
(2004) A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J., & Regier, T.
(2011).The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 118, 306–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterfalvi, J.M.
(1970) Introduction à la psycholinguistique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Peters, A.
(1990) The units of language acquisition. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1994).The language instinct. New York: Morrow. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007).The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Prince, A.
(1988) On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A.
(1990) Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammar of English. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Reber, A.
(1967) Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Redington, M., & Chater, N.
(1996) Transfer in artificial grammar: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regier, T., & Gahl, S.
(2004).Learning the unlearnable: The role of missing evidence. Cognition, 93, 147–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rondal, J.A.
(1985) Adult-child interaction and the process of language acquisition. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
(2006) Expliquer l’acquisition du langage. Caveats et perspectives. Sprimont, Belgium: Mardaga.Google Scholar
(2014a) Une théorie du fonctionnement et du développement morphosyntaxique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
(2014b) Comment l’enfant apprend la grammaire de sa langue sans le savoir. Paris: Edilivre.Google Scholar
Rowland, C., & Pine, J.
(2000) Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and WH-question acquisition: What children do know. Journal of Child Language, 27, 157–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, C., Pine, J., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A.
(2003) Determinants of acquisition order in WH-questions: Re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech. Journal of Child Language, 30, 609–635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sahin, N., Pinker, S., Cash, S., Schomer, D., & Halgren, E.
(2009) Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca’s area. Science, 326, 445–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santelman, L., & Juszcyk, P.
(1998) Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: Evidence for limitations in processing space. Cognition, 69, 105–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, C.
(1996) The empirical basis of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M., MacDonald, M., & Saffran, J.
(2002) Does grammar starts where statistics stops? Science, 298, 553–554. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.
(1978) A case study of early language awareness. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella, & W. Levelt (Eds.), The child’s conception of language (pp. 73–86). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (1985) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Solan, Z., Horn, D., Ruppin, E., & Edelman, S.
(2005) Unsupervised learning of natural languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , 102, 11629–11634.
St. Clair, M., Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M.
(2010).Learning grammatical categories from distributional cues: Flexible frames for language acquisition. Cognition, 116, 341–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stromswold, K.
(2001) The heritability of language: A review and meta-analysis of twin, adoption, and linkage studies. Language, 77, 647–723. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szagun, G.
(2011) Regular/irregular is not the whole story: The role of frequency and generalization in the acquisition of German past participle inflection. Journal of Child Language, 38, 731–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A., Lieven, E., Pine, J., & Rowland, C.
(2004).Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax. Journal of Child Language, 31, 61–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, K., Hunt, R., Vizueta, N., Sommer, T., Durston, S., Yang, Y., & Worden, M.
(2004) Evidence of developmental differences in implicit sequence learning: An fMRI study of children and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1339–1351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turk-Browne, N., Yi, D., & Chun, M.
(2006).Linking implicit and explicit memory: Common encoding factors and shared representations. Neuron, 49, 917–927. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M.
(2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J., Koroshety, W., & Pinker, S.
(1997) A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory and that grammatical rules are processes by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 266–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valian, V.
(2014) Arguing about innateness. Journal of Child Language, 41, (supplement S1), 78–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waterfall, H., Sandbank, B., Onnis, L., & Edelman, S.
(2010) An empirical generative framework for computational modeling of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 37, 671–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K., & Culicover, P.
(1980) Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, S.
(2003) Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflections in English. Journal of Child Language, 30, 75–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zervakis, J., & Mazuka, R.
(2013).Effect of repeated evaluation and repeated exposure on acceptability ratings of sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 505–525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar