Chapter published in:
Variation Rolls the Dice: A worldwide collage in honour of Salikoko S. Mufwene
Edited by Enoch O. Aboh and Cécile B. Vigouroux
[Contact Language Library 59] 2021
► pp. 133160
References
Adelaar, W. F. H.
1987Aymarismos en el quechua de Puno. Indiana 11: 223–231.Google Scholar
2008Towards a typological profile of the Andean languages. In Evidence and Counter-evidence: Essays in Honour of Frederik Kortlandt, Vol. 2: General Linguistics, A. Lubotsky, J. Schaeken & J. Wiedenhof (eds), 23–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Cajamarca Quechua and the expansion of the Huari state. In Archeology and Language in the Andes: A Cross-Disciplinary Exploration of Pre-History [Proceedings of the British Academy 173], P. Heggarty & D. G. Beresford-Jones (eds), 197–217. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(in collaboration with P. Muysken) 2004The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D.
 1981Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Beier, C., Bowser, B., Michael, L. & Wauters, V.
2014Diccionario Záparo Trilingüe: Sápara-Castellano-Kichwa / Castellano-Sápara y Kichwa-Sápara. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Birchall, J.
2014aArgument Marking Patterns in South American Languages. PhD dissertation, Radboud University.Google Scholar
2014bVerbal argument marking patterns in South American languages. In The Native Languages of South America: Origins, Development, Typology, L. O’Connor & P. Muysken (eds), 223249. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bruil, M.
2008Innovations in the Ecuadorian Converb Systems: Grammatical Change in Language Contact Situations. Master’s dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Crevels, M. & Muysken, P.
2005Inclusive/exclusive distinctions in the languages of South-Western South America. In Clusivity, Typology and Case Studies of the Inclusive–Exclusive Distinction [Typological Studies in Language 63], E. Filimónova (ed.), 311338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cusihuamán, A. G.
1976Gramática Quechua Cuzco-Collao. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Dillard, J. L.
1970Principles in the history of American English: Paradox, virginity, and cafeteria. Florida Foreign Language Reporter 8: 32–33.Google Scholar
Fabre, A.
2002Algunos rasgos tipológicos del Kamsá (valle de Sibundoy, Alto Putumayo, Sudoeste de Colombia) vistos desde una perspectiva areal. In Current Studies on South American Languages, M. Crevels, S. van de Kerke, S. Meira & H. van der Voort (eds), 169–198. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
Faller, M.
2002Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G.
(eds) 2012Archeology and Language in the Andes: A Cross-Disciplinary Exploration of Pre-History [Proceedings of the British Academy 173]. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holman, T.W
1988Waorani verb affixes. In Workpapers Concerning Waorani Discourse Features, Vol. 10: Language Data [Amerindian Series], E. G. Pike & R. Saint (eds), 57–69. Dallas TX: SIL.Google Scholar
Howard, L.
1977Esquema de los tipos de párrafo en camsá. In Estudios en camsá y catío, L. Howard & M. Schöttelndreyer (eds), 1–67. Lomalinda, Colombia: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, Editorial Townsend.Google Scholar
IIAD (Instituto Interandino de Desarrollo)
1975Urdimal Tiempomunda. Ambato: Instituto Interandino de Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Jaeger, A.
2006Typology of Periphrastic ‘Do’-Constructions. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A.
2008Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juajibioy Chindoy, A. & Wheeler, A.
1974Bosquejo Etnolingüístico del Grupo Kamsá de Sibundoy, Putumayo, Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano and Ministerio de Gobierno.Google Scholar
Juank, A.
1982Aujmatstai Yatsuchi: Manuel de Aprendizaje de la Lengua Shuar, Vol. 1, 2nd edn. Quito: Mundo Shuar.Google Scholar
Keesing, R. M.
1988Melanesian Pidgin and the Oceanic Substrate. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Krasnoukhova, O.
2012The Noun Phrase in the Languages of South America. PhD dissertation, Radboud University.Google Scholar
Levinsohn, S. H.
1974Sufijos despectivos en inga. Revista Colombiana de Antropología 16: 357361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976The Inga Language. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. H.
1989Sayings of the Ancestors: The Spiritual Life of the Sibundoy Indians. Lexington KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Moore, B. R.
1966Diccionario Castellano-Colorado, Colorado-Castellano. Llacta 22: 95221.Google Scholar
1979Método Para Aprender el Idioma Colorado (Gramática Pedagógica), Vol. 1, Lecciones 1 a 6. Quito: ILV.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S.
1996The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 13: 83–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P.
1977Syntactic Developments in the Verb Phrase of Ecuadorian Quechua. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
 2000Semantic transparency in Lowland Ecuadorian Quechua morphosyntax. Linguistics 38: 973–988. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The copula in Ecuadorian Quechua. In Linguistics and Archeology in the Americas: The Historization of Language and Society, E. B. Carlin & S. C. van de Kerke (eds), 191206. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Collapse of genitive and benefactive case in Ecuadorian Quechua? Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 48: 255260.Google Scholar
2019El kichwa ecuatoriano: Orígenes, riqueza, contactos. Quito: Abya Yala.Google Scholar
ForthcomingThe early stages of Ecuadorian Quechua. In Contact, Structure, and Change: A Festschrift for Sarah G. Thomason, A. Babel & M. Sicoli (eds). Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. & Smith, N.
1986Substrata versus Universals in Creole Genesis [Creole Language Library 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nieto Polo de Aguila, S. J. T.
1753/1964Breve Instrucción o Arte para entender la Iengua común de los indios, según se habla en la provincia de Quito. Llacta 20: Complete issue.Google Scholar
Pellizzaro, S. M.
1969Shuar: Apuntes de Gramática. Quito: Offsetec.Google Scholar
Ross, E.
1963Introduction to Ecuador Highland Quechua or Quichua in Ten Easy Lessons. Quito: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Saad, G. M.
2018A Grammar Sketch of Shuar: Focus on the Verb Phrase. Master’s dissertation: Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Seler, E.
1902Notizen über die Sprache der Colorados von Ecuador. In Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Amerikanischen Sprach- und Alterthumskunde, 317. Berlin: A. Asher.Google Scholar
Singler, J. V.
1988The homogeneity of the substrate as a factor in pidgin/creole genesis. Language 64: 27–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. C. & Chau, E.
1983Jivaroan magical songs: Achuar anent of connubial love. Amerindia 8: 1–27.Google Scholar
Tödter, C., Zahn, C., Waters, C. W. & Wise, M. R.
2002Shimikunata Asirtachik Killka Inka-Kastellanu (Diccionario Inga-Castellano) [Serie lingüística Peruana 52]. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Tuggy, J. C.
l966Vocabulario Candoshi de Loreto [Serie Linguistica Peruana 2]. Pucallpa: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Urban, M.
2018The lexical legacy of substrate languages: A test case from the southern Ecuadorian highlands. Transactions of the Philological Society 116: 435–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van de Kerke, S. & Muysken, P.
2014The Andean matrix. In The Native Languages of South America: Origins, Development, Typology, L. O’Connor & P. Muysken (eds), 126–151. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar