Article published in:
Vol. 47:1 (2021) ► pp. 3460


Agirre, Ainara Imaz
2015The acquisition of the dative alternation in English by Spanish learners. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12:63–90.Google Scholar
Alotaibi, Abdullah M., and Hashan Al-ajmi
2015The acquisition of the passive alternation by Kuwaiti EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics 5.1:44–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariamanesh, Ali A., and Zohreh Shojai
2018Markedness hypothesis: Study of English dative and benefactive alternation. Applied Linguistics Research Journal 2.3:17–33.Google Scholar
Berglund, Ylva
1997Future in present-day English: Corpus-based evidence on the rivalry of expressions. ICAME Journal 21:7–20.Google Scholar
2005Expressions of Future in Present-Day English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
British National Corpus (BNC)
Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services, from http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk/
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., and William Pagliuca
1987The evolution of future meaning. Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Anna Giacalone-Ramat, Onofrio Carruba and Giuliano Bernini, 109–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Close, Reginald Arthur
1977Some observations on the meaning and function of verb phrases having future references. Studies in English Usage: The Resources of a Present-Day English Corpus for Linguistic Analysis, ed. by Wolf-Dietrich Bald and Robert Ilson, 125–156. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
2007Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givón, 81–112. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. E.
1999The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. The Emergence of Language, ed. by Brian MacWhinney, 197–212. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch
2004Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9.1:97–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane, and Alan Prince
1986A prosodic account of the to-dative alternation. Unpublished manuscript. Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1983 Be going to, gaan, and aller: Some observations on the expression of future time. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 21.2:155–157.Google Scholar
1989 Be going to and will: A pragmatic account. Journal of Linguistics 25.2:291–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Brandon. A.
2013Expressing Future Time in Spoken Conversational English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Sitcom Friends. MA thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Roger
1981Towards an account of the possessive constructions: NP’s N and the N of NP . Journal of Linguistics 17.2:247–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirakawa, Makiko
2013Alternations and argument structure in second language English: Knowledge of two types of intransitive verbs. Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom, ed. by Melinda Whong, Kook-Hee Gil, and Heather Marsden, 117–137. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin
1968The English Verbs: Form and Meanings. Madison & London: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Dong-Han
1997Acquisition of Dative Alternation in English by Second Language Learners. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1970This bread I break: Language and interpretation. Linguistics and Literary Style, ed. by Donald C. Freeman, 120–128. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Oh, Eunjeong
2010Recovery from first-language transfer: The second language acquisition of English double objects by Korean speakers. Second Language Research 26.3:407–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
1988The English Verb (2nd edition). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Norbert
1998Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning 48.2:281–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 12.3:329–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, Eu-Jong, and Min-Chang Sung
2017A corpus-based study of contextual factors influencing Korean EFL learners’ dative alternation: Lexical verbs, syntactic weights, and information structures. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 40.1:19–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
2003Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8.2:209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2003 Be going to versus will/shall: Does syntax matter? Journal of English Linguistics 31.4:295–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ultan, Russell
1978The nature of future tenses. Universals of Human Language, vol. 3: Word Structure, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 83–123. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wekker, Herman C.
1976The Expression of Future Time in Contemporary British English: An Investigation into the Syntax and Semantics of Five Verbal Constructions Expressing Futurity. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Yook, Cheongmin
2012L1 influence on ESL learners’ acquisition of English ditransitive constructions. English Teaching 67.2:27–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The role of frequency in Korean learners’ acquisition of English dative construction. English Teaching 68.1:179–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar