References (17)
References
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2024). ACTFL proficiency guidelines. [URL]
Center for Language Education and Cooperation, Ministry of Education (2021). Guoji Zhongwen Jiaoyu Zhongwen Shuiping Dengji Biaozhun国际中文教育中文水平等级标准 [Chinese proficiency grading standards for international Chinese language education]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J. L., & Clifford, R. T. (1988). The FSI/ILR/ACTFL proficiency scales and testing techniques: Development, current status, and needed research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10 (2), 129–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment — Companion volume, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, available at [URL]
Isbell, D. R., Winke, P., & Gass, S. M. (2019). Using the ACTFL OPIc to assess proficiency and monitor progress in a tertiary foreign languages program. Language Testing, 36 (3), 439–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, W. Y. (2020). Benchmarking Students’ Attainment in Australian Tertiary Chinese Programs Using the New HSK Tests. Creative Education, 111, 624–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liao, T., Lan, P., Liang, C., & Chen, P. (2022). CEFR yu ACTFL dagang kouyu zhibiao duiying yanjiu CEFR與 ACTFL大綱口語指標對應研究:以「華語文口語測驗 」為媒介 [Aligning the CEFR Oral Descriptors with the ACTFL Speaking Proficiency Guidelines Based on the TOCFL Speaking Test]. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching 華語文教學研究, 19.21: 1–32.Google Scholar
Martyniuk, W. (Ed.). (2010). Aligning tests with the CEFR: Reflections on using the Council of Europe’s draft manual. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miaochun Wei. (2017). Chinese Placement Procedures at U.S. Postsecondary Institutions, Doctorate dissertation, The George Washington University, [URL]
National Academy for Educational Research. (2023). Huayuwen nengli jizhun yingyong cankao zhiyin華語文能力基準應用參考指引 [Reference Guidelines for TBCL Application]. [URL]
Surface, E. A., & Dierdorff, E. C. (2003). Reliability and the ACTFL oral proficiency interview: Reporting indices of interrater consistency and agreement for 19 languages. Foreign Language Annals, 36 (4), 507–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tedick, D. J. (Ed.). (2002). Proficiency-oriented language instruction and assessment: A curriculum handbook for teachers. CARLA Working Paper Series. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, The Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition [URL]
Tschirner, E., Bärenfänger, O., & Wanner, I. (2012). Assessing evidence of validity of assigning CEFR ratings to the ACTFL oral proficiency interview (OPI) and the oral proficiency interview by computer (OPIc). [URL]Google Scholar
Villar, S. M. and Meuser-Blincow, F. (1993). Proficiency requirement-based and nonproficiency requirement-based second language programs: How do students rate?. Foreign Language Annals, 26 1: 49–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vyn, R., Wesely, P. M., & Neubauer, D. (2019). Exploring the effects of foreign language instructional practices on student proficiency development. Foreign Language Annals, 52 (1), 45–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., & Ma, W. M. (2019). The assessment of Chinese L2 proficiency. In The Routledge handbook of Chinese language teaching (pp. 405–422). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., Zhang, X., Rubio, F., Gass, S., Soneson, D., & Hacking, J. (2020). The proficiency profile of language students: Implications for programs. Second Language Research & Practice, 1 (1), 25–64. [URL]