Part of
Argumentation in PracticeEdited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser
[Controversies 2] 2005
► pp. 87–98
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser
[Controversies 2] 2005
► pp. 87–98
6. The argumentative dimension of discourse
Cited by
Cited by 19 other publications
Albert, Luce & Loïc Nicolas
2010. Bibliographie. In Polémique et rhétorique [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 427 ff. 
Amossy, Ruth
2009. The New Rhetoric’s Inheritance. Argumentation and Discourse Analysis. Argumentation 23:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
Amossy, Ruth
Bolduc, Michelle
2018. Absence and Presence: Translators and Prefaces. In The Palgrave Handbook of Literary Translation, ► pp. 351 ff.
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. Introduction: From Argumentation to Language—And Vice Versa. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 1 ff.
Herman, Thierry & Diane Liberatore
2022. When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate. Argumentation 36:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Husar, Jörg
2016. A Comparative Approach to Foreign Policy Discourse Analysis. In Framing Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa [Contributions to Political Science, ], ► pp. 41 ff.
Labinaz, Paolo & Marina Sbisà
Orkibi, Eithan
2018. Precedential Ad Hominem in Polemical Exchange: Examples from the Israeli Political Debate. Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
Oswald, Steve, Thierry Herman & Jérôme Jacquin
2018. Introduction. In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32], ► pp. 1 ff.
Santulli, Francesca
2023. Genre as a Context for Persuasion: The Construction of Identities in Different Forms of Institutionalised Discourse. A Case Study. In Exploring Contextualism and Performativity [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 30], ► pp. 57 ff.
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022. Agreement and Persuasion. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 1 ff.
Sayago, Sebastián
2015. The construction of qualitative and quantitative data using discourse analysis as a research technique. Quality & Quantity 49:2 ► pp. 727 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris
2022. Unveiling the rationale of soft hate speech in multimodal artefacts. Journal of Language and Discrimination
Serafis, Dimitris, Sara Greco, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2020. Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies 17:5 ► pp. 545 ff.
Spiessens, Anneleen
2013. Translation as argumentation: ethos and ethical positioning in Hoess'sCommandant of Auschwitz. Translation Studies 6:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Linguistic Approaches. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Linguistic Approaches. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 479 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.