Part of
Argumentation in PracticeEdited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser
[Controversies 2] 2005
► pp. 87–98
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser
[Controversies 2] 2005
► pp. 87–98
6. The argumentative dimension of discourse
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
Albert, Luce & Loïc Nicolas
2010. Bibliographie. In Polémique et rhétorique [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 427 ff. 
Amossy, Ruth
2009. The New Rhetoric’s Inheritance. Argumentation and Discourse Analysis. Argumentation 23:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
Amossy, Ruth
Bolduc, Michelle
2018. Absence and Presence: Translators and Prefaces. In The Palgrave Handbook of Literary Translation, ► pp. 351 ff.
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. Introduction: From Argumentation to Language—And Vice Versa. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 1 ff.
Herman, Thierry & Diane Liberatore
2022. When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate. Argumentation 36:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Husar, Jörg
2016. A Comparative Approach to Foreign Policy Discourse Analysis. In Framing Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa [Contributions to Political Science, ], ► pp. 41 ff.
Labinaz, Paolo & Marina Sbisà
Orkibi, Eithan
2018. Precedential Ad Hominem in Polemical Exchange: Examples from the Israeli Political Debate. Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
Oswald, Steve, Thierry Herman & Jérôme Jacquin
2018. Introduction. In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32], ► pp. 1 ff.
Santulli, Francesca
2023. Genre as a Context for Persuasion: The Construction of Identities in Different Forms of Institutionalised Discourse. A Case Study. In Exploring Contextualism and Performativity [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 30], ► pp. 57 ff.
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022. Agreement and Persuasion. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 1 ff.
Sayago, Sebastián
2015. The construction of qualitative and quantitative data using discourse analysis as a research technique. Quality & Quantity 49:2 ► pp. 727 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris
2022. Unveiling the rationale of soft hate speech in multimodal artefacts. Journal of Language and Discrimination
Serafis, Dimitris
2024. Chapter 3. Normalizing assimilation in antiracist (con)texts and (re)producing liquid racism. In Exploring the Ambivalence of Liquid Racism [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 341], ► pp. 71 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris, Sara Greco, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2020. Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies 17:5 ► pp. 545 ff.
Spiessens, Anneleen
2013. Translation as argumentation: ethos and ethical positioning in Hoess'sCommandant of Auschwitz. Translation Studies 6:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Linguistic Approaches. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Linguistic Approaches. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 479 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.