This introductory chapter explains what it means to reinscribe the political dimension into studying images. Ever since the ‘visual turn’ was proclaimed by W. J. T. Mitchell, images have been analysed for what they ‘do’ to their observers, for the almost magical power they seem to have. In a basic category mistake, agency is ascribed to images in the discourse of visual studies. Images, however, are merely tools in the political media discourse and society’s negotiation of values. Drawing on poststructuralist analyses of the postmodern condition in late modern societies, this article ventures forth to design an ‘images in use’ approach to visual studies, which allows us to discuss power and images in political terms.
2023. A Comparative Analysis of Multimodal Native Cultural Content in English-Language Textbooks in China and Mongolia. SAGE Open 13:2
EMEKLİER, Nihal & Bilgehan EMEKLİER
2022. Görselin Duygusal Gücü: Göçmen, Mülteci ve Sığınmacıların Küresel Görsel Politikadaki Temsili Üzerine. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler 2:26 ► pp. 518 ff.
Farkas, Xénia & Márton Bene
2021. Images, Politicians, and Social Media: Patterns and Effects of Politicians’ Image-Based Political Communication Strategies on Social Media. The International Journal of Press/Politics 26:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Wilde, Lukas R. A.
2021. Klaus Sachs-Hombach. In The Palgrave Handbook of Image Studies, ► pp. 873 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.