Article published in:
From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines
Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55] 2014
► pp. 2746
References

References

Benoit, K. and M. Laver
2006Party Politics in Modern Democracies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007aBenchmarks for text analysis: A response to Budge and ­Pennings. Electoral Studies 26(1), pp. 130–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007bEstimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Studies 26(1), pp. 90–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Compared to what? A comment on “A robust transformation procedure for interpreting political text” by Martin and Vanberg. Political Analysis 16(1), pp. 101–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bräuninger, T. and M. Debus
2008Der Einfluss von Koalitionsaussagen, programmatischen Standpunkten und der Bundespolitik auf die Regierungsbildung in den deutschen Ländern. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 49(2), pp. 309–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budge, I., H.-D. Klingemann, A. Volkens, J. Bara and E. Tanenbaum
(eds) 2001Mapping Policy Preferences I. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Budge, I.
2000Expert judgments of party policy positions: Uses and limitations in political research European Journal of Political Research 37(1), pp. 103–113. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budge, I. and P. Pennings
2007Do they work? Validating computerized word frequency estimates against policy series. Electoral Studies 26(1), pp. 121–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Castles, F.G. and P. Mair
1984Left-right political scales: Some ‘expert’ judgments. European Journal of Political Research 12(1), pp. 73–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Debus, M.
2009Pre-electoral commitments and government formation. Public Choice 138(1), pp. 45–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J.D. and R. Inglehart
1995Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 societies. Party Politics 1(1), pp. 73–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hug, S. and T. Schulz
2007Left-right positions of political parties in Switzerland. Party Politics 13(3), pp. 305–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, W.
1987Canada 1945–1980: Party platforms and campaign strategies. In I. Budge, D. Robertson and D. Hearl (eds), Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change: Spatial Analysis of Post-War Elections Programmes in Nineteen Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jian-Yun, N., M. Simard, P. Isabelle and R. Durand
1999Cross-language information retrieval based on parallel texts and automatic mining of parallel texts from the web. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. Berkeley, California, United States: ACM.
Johnston, R.
2008Polarized pluralism in the Canadian party system: Presidential address to the Canadian Political Science Association, June 5, 2008. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 41(4), pp. 815–834. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keman, H.
2007Experts and manifestos: different sources – Same results for comparative research? Electoral Studies 26(1), pp. 76–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kleinnijenhuis, J., and P. Pennings
1999A probabilistic keyword approach to textual analysis. In Mannheim Joint Sessions of the ECPR. Mannheim.Google Scholar
Klemmensen, R., S.B. Hobolt and M.E. Hansen
2007Estimating policy positions using political texts: An evaluation of the wordscores approach. Electoral Studies 26(4), pp. 746–755. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, H.-D., A. Volkens, J. Bara, I. Budge and M.D. McDonald
2007Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knutsen, O.
1998The strength of the partisan component of left-right identity: A comparative longitudinal study of left-right party polarization in eight west European countries. Party Politics 4(1), pp. 5–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M.
1998Party policy in Britain 1997: Results from an expert survey. Political Studies 46(2), pp. 336–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M. and K. Benoit
2005Estimating party policy positions: Japan in comparative context. Japanese Journal of Political Science 6(2), pp. 187–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M., K. Benoit and J. Garry
2003Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. The American Political Science Review 97(2), pp. 311–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M., K. Benoit and N. Sauger
2006Policy competition in the 2002 French legislative and presidential elections. European Journal of Political Research 45(4), pp. 667–697. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M. and J. Garry
2000Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science 44(3), pp. 619–634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M. and W.B. Hunt
1992Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lederer, M.
1994La traduction aujourd’hui: le modèle interprétatif. Vanves: Hachette F. L. E.Google Scholar
Lowe, W.
2008Understanding wordscores. Political Analysis 16(4), pp. 356–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magin, R., M. Freitag and A. Vatter
2009Cleavage structures and voter alignments within nations. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 3(2), pp. 231–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, P.
2001Searching for the positions of political actors: A review of approaches and a critical evaluation of expert surveys. In M. Laver (ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. New York: Routledge, pp. 10–29.Google Scholar
Marks, G., L. Hooghe, M.R. Steenbergen and R. Bakker
2007Crossvalidating data on party positioning on European integration. Electoral Studies 26(1), pp. 23–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L.W. and G. Vanberg
2008A robust transformation procedure for interpreting political text. Political Analysis 16(1), pp. 93–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, A. and K. Nigam
1998A comparison of event models for naive Bayes text classification. In AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization.
Monroe, B.L., M.P. Colaresi and K.M. Quinn
2008Fightin’ words: Lexical feature selection and evaluation for identifying the content of political conflict. Political Analysis 16(4), pp. 372–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Proksch, S.-O. and J.B. Slapin
2009Position taking in European parliament speeches. British Journal of Political Science 40, pp. 587–611. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ray, L.
2001A natural sentence approach to the computer coding of party manifestos. In M. Laver (ed.), Estimating the Positions of Political Actors. New York: Routledge, pp. 149–161.Google Scholar
2007Validity of measured party positions on European integration: assumptions, approaches, and a comparison of alternative measures. Electoral Studies 26(1), pp. 11–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slapin, J.B. and S.-O. Proksch
2008A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. American Journal of Political Science 52(3), pp. 705–722. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinay, J.-P. and J. Darbelnet
2003 [1977] Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais : Méthode de traduction. Laval: Groupe Beauchemin.Google Scholar
Volkens, A.
2007Strengths and weaknesses of approaches to measuring policy positions of parties. Electoral Studies 26(1), pp. 108–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitefield, S., M.A. Vachudova, M.R. Steenbergen, R. Rohrschneider, G. Marks, M.P. ­Loveless, and L. Hooghe
2007Do expert surveys produce consistent estimates of party stances on European integration? Comparing expert surveys in the difficult case of Central and Eastern Europe. Electoral Studies 26(1), pp. 50–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Ch. C. and K. Wing Li
2003Automatic construction of English/Chinese parallel corpora.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(8), pp. 730–742. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Daigneault, Pierre-Marc, Dominic Duval & Louis M. Imbeau
2018. Supervised scaling of semi-structured interview transcripts to characterize the ideology of a social policy reform. Quality & Quantity 52:5  pp. 2151 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.