Part of
From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines
Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55] 2014
► pp. 4770
References (28)
References
Adamic, L. and N. Glance. 2005. The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery (LinkKDD 2005, New York, NY), pp. 36–43.
Clauset, A., M.E.J. Newman and C. Moore. 2004. Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E, 70(6), 06611, 6 pages. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csa´rdi, G. and T. Nepusz. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. International Journal Complex Systems, 1695.Google Scholar
Durant, K.T. and M.D. Smith. 2006. Mining sentiment classification from political web logs. In Pro-ceedings of Workshop on Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (WebKDD-2006).
. 2007. Predicting the political sentiment of web log posts using supervised machine learning techniques coupled with feature selection. In Advances in Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis : Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery on the Web (WEBKDD 2006, Philadelphia, PA), pp. 187–206.
Efron, M. 2004. Cultural orientation: Classifying subjective documents by co-citation analysis. In Style and Meaning in Language, Art, Music, and Design: Papers from the 2004 AAAI Fall Symposium, Arlington, VA. Technical Report FS-04-07, pp. 41–48.
Hall, M., E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann and I.H. Witten. 2009. The weka data mining software: An update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11(1), pp. 10–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hargittai, E., J. Gallo and M. Kane. 2008. Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers. Public Choice 134(1), pp. 67–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsueh, P.Y., P. Melville and V. Sindhwani. 2009. Data quality from crowdsourcing: a study of annotation selection criteria. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 Workshop on Active Learning for Natural Language Processing, pp. 27–35. DOI logo
Kim, S.-M. and E. Hovy. 2007. Crystal: Analyzing predictive opinions on the web. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL, Prague), pp. 1056–1064.
Kittur, A., E.H. Chi and B. Suh. 2008. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proceeding of the 26th annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Florence, pp. 453–456.
Kwon, N., S.W. Shulman and E. Hovy. 2006. Multidimensional text analysis for erule-making. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DG.O 2006, San Diego, CA), pp. 157–166.
Lerman, K., A. Gilder, M. Dredze and F. Pereira. 2008. Reading the markets: Forecasting public opinion of political candidates by news analysis. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2008, Manchester), pp. 473–480.
Leskovec, J., M. McGlohon, C. Faloutsos, N. Glance and M. Hurst. 2007. Cascading behavior in large blog graphs: Patterns and a model. Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Data Mining (SDM07, Minneanapolis, MN). Tech report (12 pp.): CMU-ML-06-113.DOI logo
Lin, W.H., T. Wilson, J. Wiebe and A. Hauptmann. 2006. Which side are you on? identifying perspectives at the document and sentence levels. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X New York, NY), pp. 109–116.
Malouf, R. and T. Mullen. 2008. Taking sides: User classification for informal online political discourse. Internet Research 18(2), pp. 177–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, C.D., P. Raghavan and H. Schütze. 2008. An Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin and J.M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social net- works. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), pp. 415–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moilanen, K. and S. Pulman. Multi-entity sentiment scoring. 2009 In Proceedings of the Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2009, Borovets, Bulgaria), pp. 258–263.
Mullen, T. and R. Malouf. 2006. Preliminary investigation into sentiment analysis of informal political discourse. In Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs: Papers from 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium (Stanford, CA), pp. 159–162.
Pang, B. and L. Lee. 2008. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis, volume 2 of Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval. Now Publishers.
Porter, M. 1980 An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(1), p 3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, R., B. O’Connor, D. Jurafsky and A.Y. Ng. 2008. Cheap and fast—but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2008, Honolulu, HI), pp. 254–263.
Thomas, M., B. Pang and L. Lee. 2006. Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2006, Sydney, Australia), pp. 327–335.
Tremayne, M., N. Zheng, J.K. Lee and J. Jeong. 2006. Issue publics on the web: Applying network theory to the war blogosphere. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(1), pp. 290– 310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Atteveldt, W., J. Kleinnijenhuis and N. Ruigrok. 2008a. Parsing, semantic networks, and political authority using syntactic analysis to extract semantic relations from Dutch newspaper articles. Political Science 16(4), pp. 428–446.Google Scholar
Van Atteveldt, W., J. Kleinnijenhuis, N. Ruigrok and S. Schlobach. 2008b. Good news or bad news? Conducting sentiment analysis on Dutch text to distinguish between positive and negative relations. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 5(1), pp. 73–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, B., S. Kaufmann and D. Diermeier. 2008. Exploring the characteristics of opinion expressions for political opinion classification. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Partnerships for Public Innovation, Vol. 289 (DG.O 2008, Montreal), pp. 82–89.
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Mohanty, Priyakrushna, Rashmiranjan Choudhury & Aishwarya Singh Raikwar
2024. New Populism and The Social Network. In Encyclopedia of New Populism and Responses in the 21st Century,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Biessmann, Felix
2022. Changes in Policy Preferences in German Tweets During the COVID Pandemic. In Social Informatics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13618],  pp. 426 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Jie, Feiran Huang, Xiaoming Zhang, Senzhang Wang, Chaozhuo Li, Zhoujun Li & Yueying He
2019. Sentiment analysis of social images via hierarchical deep fusion of content and links. Applied Soft Computing 80  pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
Nandal, Neha, Jyoti Pruthi & Amit Choudhary
2018. Challenges in the Field of Aspect Level Sentiment Analysis. In Smart Trends in Information Technology and Computer Communications [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 876],  pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Vivanco, Elizabeth, Javier Palanca, Elena del Val, Miguel Rebollo & Vicent Botti
2017. Using Geo-Tagged Sentiment to Better Understand Social Interactions. In Advances in Practical Applications of Cyber-Physical Multi-Agent Systems: The PAAMS Collection [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10349],  pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Nguyen, Minh Luan
2016. Leveraging Emotional Consistency for Semi-supervised Sentiment Classification. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9651],  pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Chalothom, Tawunrat & Jeremy Ellman
2015. Simple Approaches of Sentiment Analysis via Ensemble Learning. In Information Science and Applications [Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 339],  pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
Yusof, Nor Nadiah, Azlinah Mohamed & Shuzlina Abdul-Rahman
2015. Reviewing Classification Approaches in Sentiment Analysis. In Soft Computing in Data Science [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 545],  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.