Cover not available
Part of
Identity Struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world
Edited by Dorien Van De Mieroop and Stephanie Schnurr
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 69] 2017
► pp. 95–124

Chapter 6
Who’s the expert?

Negotiating competence and authority in guided tours

Guided tours are a “perspicuous setting” (Garfinkel & Wieder 1992) both for the study of asymmetries in professional contexts of interaction as well as for the analysis of how participants negotiate identities, categories and expertise. At first glance, the categorial distinction between “guide” and “guided” participants appears to be clear-cut. However, analyses of video recorded tours taking place in various sites show that the taken-for-granted authority, expertise and thus identity of the “guide” is repeatedly challenged by his or her co-participants. Based on conversation analytic methods, in this chapter we focus on sequences of interaction in which the participants compete for epistemic authority. We show how such competition emerges, how participants handle it, and how it is eventually solved.
Keywords: social interaction, conversation analysis, epistemics, membership categories, guided tours
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Unpacking the notion of identity
  • Guided tours: “Knowledgeable guide” and “unknowing guided”?
  • Claiming knowledge in first position
  • Claiming knowledge in second position
    • Guided participants responding to the guide’s emerging projections
    • Completion of recognizably “incomplete” turns
    • Early completion in overlap
    • Exploiting ongoing projections: Competing continuations of the guide’s turn
    • Continuing after the end of a sequence initiated by the guide
    • Competing for the right to extend the explanation
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69.06des
References (29)
References
Best, Katie. 2012. “Making museum tours better: Understanding what a guided tour really is and what a tour guide really does.” Museum Management and Curatorship 27 (1): 35–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias, and Mondada, Lorenza. 2013. “Walking away. The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 47 (1): 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys. 2010. “Reference as an interactively and multimodally accomplished practice: Organizing spatial reorientation in guided tours.” In Spoken Communication, ed. by Massimo Pettorino, Antonella Giannini, Isabella Chiari, and Francesca Dovetto, 137–170. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Rearranging (in) space: On mobility and its relevance for the study of face-to-face interaction.” In Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional and Cognitive Perspectives, ed. by Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Benedikt Szmercsanyi, and Anja Stukenbrock, 434–463. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys, and Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie. 2008. “Topical and sequential backlinking in a French radio phone-in programme: Turn shapes and sequential placements.” Pragmatics 18 (3): 381–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys, and Mondada, Lorenza. 2014. “Reorganizing mobile formations: When ‘guided’ participants initiate reorientations in guided tours.” Space and Culture 17 (2): 157–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, and Wieder, D. Lawrence. 1992. “Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis.” In Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, ed. by Graham Watson, and Robert M. Seiler, 175–205. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1987. “Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments.” IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Mondada, Lorenza, and Nevile, Maurice (eds.). 2013. Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. “The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Raymond, Geoffrey. 2005. “The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 294–338. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner. 13–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, Paul, Broth, Mathias, and Haddington, Pentti. 2009. “Communicating place, space and mobility.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (10): 1879–1886. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. “Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (10): 1977–1997. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Garden lessons: Embodied action and joint attention in extended sequences.” In Interaction and Everyday Life, ed. by Hisashu Nasu and Frances Chaput Waksler, 293–311. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Displaying, contesting, and negotiating epistemic authorities in social interaction.” Discourse Studies 15 (5): 597–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Bodies in action: Multimodal analysis of walking and talking.” Language and Dialogue 4 (3): 357–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierroux, Palmyre. 2010. “Guiding meaning on guided tours.” In Inside Multimodal Composition, ed. by Andrew Morrison, 417–450. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Pitsch, Karola. 2012. “Zur interaktiven Konstitution von Objekten in einer Museumsausstellung [On the interactive constitution of objects in a museum exhibit].” In Raum als interaktive Ressource, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf, Lorenza Mondada, and Reinhold Schmitt, 233–274. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Stukenbrock, Anja, and Birkner, Karin. 2010. “Multimodale Ressourcen für Stadtführungen [Multimodal resources for city tours].” In Deutschland als fremde Kultur: Vermittlungsverfahren in Touristenführungen, ed. by Marcella Costa, and Bernd Müller-Jacquier, 214–243. München: Judicium Verlag.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 31–74. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2010. “An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2772–2781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van De Mieroop, Dorien, and Clifton, Jonathan. 2011. “Standardized relational pairs in interviews with former slaves: Construction, negotiation and alignment.” Narrative Inquiry 21 (1): 44–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. Rod. 1978. “Categorization, authorization and blame-negation in conversation.” Sociology 12: 105–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

De Stefani, Elwys
2021. If-Clauses, Their Grammatical Consequents, and Their Embodied Consequence: Organizing Joint Attention in Guided Tours. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Rauniomaa, Mirka, Tiina Keisanen & Pauliina Siitonen
2021. Shared understandings of the human–nature relationship in encounters with small wildlife. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Schoofs, Kim & Dorien Van De Mieroop
2021. Epistemic competitions over Jewish Holocaust survivors’ stories in interviews. Discourse & Society 32:6 ► pp. 728 ff. DOI logo
De Stefani, Elwys & Lorenza Mondada
2018. Encounters in Public Space: How Acquainted Versus Unacquainted Persons Establish Social and Spatial Arrangements. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:3 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
De Stefani, Elwys & Lorenza Mondada
2024. Revisiting talk in space. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. OKAY across Languages [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 34], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.