Article published in:
Diachronic Treebanks
Edited by Hanne Martine Eckhoff, Silvia Luraghi and Marco Passarotti
[Diachronica 35:3] 2018
► pp. 429449
References

[ p. 447 ]References

Adams, James Noel
2013Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bamman, David, Marco Passarotti, Gregory Crane & Savine Raynaud
2007Guidelines for the syntactic annotation of Latin treebanks (v. 1.3). http://​nlp​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/syntax​/treebank​/ldt​/1​.5​/docs​/guidelines​.pdf (3 June, 2017.)
Bartoli Langeli, Attilio
2006Notai: scrivere documenti nell’Italia medievale. Roma: Viella.Google Scholar
Black, Robert
2001Humanism and Education in Medieval and Renaissance Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano
2012The syntax-lexicon continuum. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 735–747. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chiarcos, Christian, Berry Claus & Michael Grabski
2011Introduction: Salience in linguistics and beyond. In Christian Chiarcos, Berry Claus & Michael Grabski (eds.), Salience: Multidisciplinary perspectives on its function in discourse, 1–28. Berlin: Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cintrón-Valentín, Myrna C. & Nick C. Ellis
2016Salience in second language acquisition: Physical form, learner attention, and instructional focus. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 1284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse
2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, Heidi C. & Marina K. Burt
1973Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning 23. 245–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldschneider, Jennifer M. & Robert M. DeKeyser
2001Explaining the ‘natural order of l2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51. 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guyotjeannin, Olivier, Jacques Pycke & Benoît-Michel Tock
1993Diplomatique médiévale. Paris: Brepols.Google Scholar
Korkiakangas, Timo
2016Subject case in the Latin of Tuscan charters of the 8th and 9th centuries. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Korkiakangas, Timo & Matti Lassila
2013Abbreviations, fragmentary words, formulaic language: Treebanking medieval charter material. In Francesco Mambrini, Marco Passarotti & Caroline Sporleder (eds.), Proceedings of the third workshop on annotation of corpora for research in the humanities, 61–72. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Korkiakangas, Timo & Marco Passarotti
2011Challenges in annotating Medieval Latin charters. Journal of Language Technology and Computational Linguistics 26. 103–114.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich
1962Romanische Sprachwissenschaft, II: Formenlehre. Berlin: Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2012From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LLCT . Available in pml.xml format at Crossref
MacKenzie, Ian & Martin A. Kayman
(eds.) 2018Formulaicity and creativity in language and literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin
1996On the Romance inflectional endings i and e . Romance Philology 50. 147–182.Google Scholar
[ p. 448 ]
Pienemann, Manfred
1999Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, Francesco
1965Esigenze di realismo e dislocazione morfologica in testi preromanzi. Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medievale 7. 972–998.Google Scholar
Sairio, Anni & Minna Palander-Collin
2012The reconstruction of prestige patterns in language history. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 626–638. Chichester: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
2011Morphosyntactic persistence. In Adam Ledgeway, Martin Maiden & John C. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. 1: Structures, 318–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, Luigi
1933Note diplomatiche sulle carte longobarde II: Tracce di antichi formulari nelle carte longobarde. Archivio Storico Italiano 19. 3–34.Google Scholar
Sornicola, Rosanna
2012Bilinguismo e diglossia dei territori bizantini e longobardi del Mezzogiorno: le testimonianze dei documenti del IX e X secolo. Quaderni dell’Accademia Pontaniana 59. 1–102.Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga
2010Constituent order in Classical Latin prose. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko
1981Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Valentini, Cecilia
2017L’evoluzione della codifica del genitivo dal tipo sintetico al tipo analitico nelle carte del Codice diplomatico longobardo. Firenze: Università degli Studi di Firenze dissertation.Google Scholar
Weber, Shirley Howard
1924Anthimus, De observatio[ne] ciborum: Text, commentary, and glossary, with a study of the Latinity. Leiden: Late E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Wright, Roger
1991The conceptual distinction between Latin and Romance: Invention or evolution. In Roger Wright (ed.), Latin and the Romance languages in the Early Middle Ages, 103–113. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Zamboni, Alberto
2000Alle origini dell’italiano: dinamiche e tipologie della transizione dal latino. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Zobl, Helmut & Juana Liceras
1994Functional categories and acquisition orders. Language Learning 44. 169–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar