Grammation, regrammation, and degrammation
Tense loss in Russian
Henning Andersen | UCLA
Taking Heine’s (2003) characterization of Grammaticalization as its point of departure, this paper proposes an elementary framework, and corresponding terminology, for the description of the most common types of historical change in grammar (changes in content, content syntax, expression, and morphosyntax) and the types of innovation that give rise to them (neologism, extension, adoption, reanalysis, monolingual and bilingual). These basic conceptual tools of the historical linguist are illustrated with an analytic account of the development of the Russian tense–aspect system, from prehistory through the attested period. The account includes a plausible explication of the remarkable historical reduction in tense–aspect paradigms, from eight in Old Russian through five in Middle Russian to three in the modern language.
Keywords: aspect, grammaticalization, extension, reanalysis, renewal, innovation, tense, markedness
Published online: 15 December 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.2.02and
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.2.02and
Cited by
Cited by 44 other publications
Ahland, Michael
2012. Review of Norde (2009): Degrammaticalization.
Studies in Language 36:1 ► pp. 183 ff. 
Amatuzzi, Antonella, Wendy Ayres-Bennett, Annette Gerstenberg, Lene Schøsler & Carine Skupien-Dekens
2020. Changement linguistique et périodisation du français (pré)classique: deux études de cas à partir des corpus du RCFC.
Journal of French Language Studies 30:3 ► pp. 301 ff.
Andersen, Henning
2015. Review of Fertig (2013): Analogy and morphological change.
Diachronica 32:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Bubenik, Vit
2019.
In Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 345],
► pp. 193 ff.
Bubenik, Vit & Leila Ziamajidi
2020.
In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350],
► pp. 274 ff.
Cennamo, Michela
2019.
In Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 345],
► pp. 205 ff.
Daniels, Don
2020. The history of tense and aspect in the Sogeram family.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
DE MULDER, WALTER & ADELINE PATARD
2015. Marqueurs verbaux de TAM en diachronie.
Journal of French Language Studies 25:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Durst-Andersen, Per
2018. Aspect as a communicative category. Evidence from English, Russian and French.
Lingua 209 ► pp. 44 ff.
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine & Dag T.T. Haug
2015. Aspect and prefixation in Old Church Slavonic.
Diachronica 32:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
Gardani, Francesco
2016.
In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336],
► pp. 227 ff.
Gvozdanovic, Jadranka
2019.
In Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 345],
► pp. 395 ff.
Haberland, Hartmut & Lars Heltoft
2008. Die schwache Adjektivflexion im Dänischen und Deutschen. Eine Fingerübung in diachronischer Typologie.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 40:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Hansen, Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard
2021. From case to topology.
NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 74:2 ► pp. 278 ff.
Heine, Bernd
2012. Review of Nørgård-Sørensen, Heltoft & Schøsler (2011): Connecting grammaticalisation.
Studies in Language 36:1 ► pp. 202 ff.
Heltoft, Lars
2010. Paradigmatic structure and reanalysis: from NPs to DPs in Scandinavian.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Heltoft, Lars
2012. Zero expression of arguments in Old Danish.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 44:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Heltoft, Lars
2014.
In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69],
► pp. 203 ff.
Heltoft, Lars, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh & Lene Schøsler
2019.
In Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 345],
► pp. 1 ff.
ISHIZAKI, YASUAKI
2012. Degrammaticalization.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 29:1 ► pp. 176 ff.
Jakobsen, Lisbeth Falster & Lars Heltoft
2012. Paradigm formation: Changes of function and structure in German and Danish mood systems.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 44:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Jeppesen Kragh, Kirsten & Lene Schøsler
2014.
In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69],
► pp. 169 ff.
KRAGH, KIRSTEN JEPPESEN & LENE SCHØSLER
2015. Regrammation and paradigmatization: Diachronic analysis of a number of progressive periphrases in French.
Journal of French Language Studies 25:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
Kragh, Kirsten Jeppesen & Lene Schøsler
2019.
In Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 345],
► pp. 271 ff.
Lindschouw, Jan
2013.
In Research on Old French: The State of the Art [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 88],
► pp. 123 ff.
Mattiello, Elisa & Wolfgang U. Dressler
2021. A post-loan word formation pattern: Latinate English synthetic compounds.
Lingua 253 ► pp. 103029 ff.
Narrog, Heiko
2016.
In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336],
► pp. 93 ff.
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens
2014.
In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69],
► pp. 243 ff.
Popescu, Cecilia-Mihaela
2018. Parcursul diacronic al formelor de viitor din limba franceză din prisma teoriei regramatizării.
Diacronia :7
Popescu, Cecilia-Mihaela
2018. The diachronic evolution of future tense forms in French from the perspective of the re-grammaticalization theory.
Diacronia :7
Reid, Lawrence A.
2009. On the diachronic development of C1V1- reduplication in some Austronesian languages.
Morphology 19:2 ► pp. 239 ff.
Remberger, Prof. Dr. Eva-Maria
2014. Jens Nørgård Sørensen / Lars Heltoft / Lene Schøsler, Connecting Grammaticalisation (Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 65), Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 2011, XIII + 347 p..
Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 130:2
Rivera, Daniel M. Sáez
2013. Review of Nørgård-Sorensen, Heltoft & Schøsler (2011): Connecting Grammaticalisation.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 307 ff.
Rosenkvist, Henrik
2011. .
Lingua 121:2 ► pp. 320 ff.
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019.
In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme,
► pp. 237 ff.
Schøsler, Lene
2010. Organization and reorganization of a constructional paradigm: the case of dative two-argument constructions from Latin to Modern French.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
SCHØSLER, LENE
2015. Grammaticalisation des valeurs d’aspect et de phase? A propos des constructions à verbes supports.
Journal of French Language Studies 25:2 ► pp. 239 ff.
Trousdale, Graeme & Muriel Norde
2013. Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: two case studies.
Language Sciences 36 ► pp. 32 ff.
van Gelderen, Elly
2010. Muriel Norde, Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. xvi+270..
Journal of Linguistics 46:1 ► pp. 249 ff.
Van linden, An
2012. Review of Stathi, Gehweiler & König (2010): Grammaticalization: Current views and issues.
Functions of Language 19:1 ► pp. 135 ff.
Van linden, An & Freek Van de Velde
2014. (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic–pragmatic values.
Journal of Pragmatics 60 ► pp. 226 ff.
von Mengden, Ferdinand
2016.
In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336],
► pp. 121 ff.
von Mengden, Ferdinand & Evie Coussé
2014.
In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69],
► pp. 1 ff.
Willis, David
2016.
In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336],
► pp. 197 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.