Review published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:2 (2015) ► pp. 277–283

Review of Seržant & Kulikov (2013): The diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects

Published online: 15 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.2.05all
References

References

Allen, Cynthia L.
1995 On doing as you please. In Andreas Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 35), 275–308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter, Wayne Harbert, Gabriella Hermon & S.N. Sridhar
1980 The acquisition of subjecthood. Language 56. 719–743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2010 The Behavior-before-Coding principle in syntactic change. In Franck Floricic (ed.), Mélanges Denis Creissels, 493–506. Paris: Presses de L’École Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar
2001 The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, vol. 2 (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 20/Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft Bd 20), 1492–1510. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1976 Towards a universal definition of subject. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Miura, Ayumi
2014 Middle English verbs of emotion and impersonal constructions: Verb meaning and syntax in diachrony (Oxford Studies in the History of English). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
2002 On the rise of ‘Celtic’ syntax in Middle English. In Peter J. Lucas & Angela M. Lucas (eds.), Middle English from tongue to text: Selected papers from the Third International Conference on Middle English: Language and Text, held at Dublin, Ireland, 1–4 July 1999 (Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 4), 205–234. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar