Cover not available
Part of
From Pragmatics to Dialogue
Edited by Edda Weigand and István Kecskés
[Dialogue Studies 31] 2018
► pp. 29–44

Humboldt, Bhartrihari, and the dialogic

Drawing on the work of von Humboldt (1963, 1997, 1999) and the 5th century BCE Indian Grammarian Bhartrihari (1971), this essay sketches how dialogue is neither a special-use of language nor a specific mode of pragmatics, but forms instead the primordial character of all language. When the study of language is restricted to Saussure’s bifurcated paradigm, the ontologically basic character of dialogue is concealed. In what follows, I will first briefly sketch a history of ancient Indian linguistics and its influence on European linguistics, then briefly review Saussure’s bifurcated conceptions of langue and parole, and then illustrate several ways that Bhartrihari and Humboldt saw language as, at heart, dialogic.
Keywords: communicative consciousness and praxis, dialogue, Indian philosophy of language, interlistening, intersubjectivity, linguistics, pragmatics, speech, speaking, and listening
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Indian philosophy of language
  • 3.Humboldt’s context
  • 4.Saussure and language use
  • 5.Dialogical language
  • 6.Dialogical thought
  • 7.Conclusion: Dialogical world-making
  • References
Published online: 5 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.03lip
References (47)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Translatedby Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
1984. Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Poetics. ed. by Michael Holquist, translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986. Speech Genres & Other Late Essays. Translatedby Vern McGee. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Beck, Guy L. 1993. Sonic Theology: Hinduism and Sacred Sound. Studies in Comparative Religion. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Bhartrhari. 1971. Vākyapadīya: Critical Text of Cantos I and II. Translated by K. Raghavan. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Bopp, Franz. 1885. A Comparative Grammar of the Sanskrit, Zend, Greek, Latin, Lithuanian, Gothic German and Sclavonic Languages. University of California Libraries.Google Scholar
Bronkhorst, Johannes. 1992. “Pānini’s View of Meaning and Its Western Counterpart.” In Current Advances in Semantic Theory, ed. by Maxim I. Stamenov, 455–464. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2001. “The Peacock’s Egg: Bhartrhari on Language and Reality.” Philosophy East and West. 51(4): 474–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Bhattoji Diksita on Sphota.” Journal of Indian Philosophy. 33: 3–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buber, Martin. 1958. I and Thou. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Colebrooke, H. T. 1801/1873. “On the Sanskrit and Prakrit Languages.” In Miscellaneous Essays, ed. by H. T. Colebrooke, with Life of the Author, by His Son, Sir T. E. Colebrooke, vol. 1, new edition. London: Trubner.Google Scholar
Deshpande, Madhav. 2011. “Language and Testimony in Classical Indian Philosophy.” In Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2003. “Whorf Meets Wierzbicka: Variation and Universals in Language and Thinking.” Language Sciences. 25: 393–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golubovs’ka, Iryna. 2009. “Language World Models: Universal and Specific Features.” Philologica Jassyensia, Anul V, Nr. 1 (9): 131–140.Google Scholar
von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1963. Humanist without Portfolio: An Anthology of the Writings of Wilhelm von Humboldt. Translated by Marianne Cowan. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1997. Essays on language, ed. by Theo Harde and D. Farrelly. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 1999. On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and Its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species, ed. by Michael Losonsky, Translated by Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa. 1991. Universal History of Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Christopher Lyle. 2012. Listening to the Logos: Speech and the Coming of Wisdom in Ancient Greece. The University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lipari, Lisbeth. 2014a. Listening, Thinking, Being: Toward an Ethics of Attunement. State College, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Interlistening and the Idea of Dialogue.” Theory and Psychology. 24(4): 504–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “The Speech We Do Not Speak: Dialogic Mind, Praxis, and Ethics.” Language and Dialogue. 7(1): 45–62Google Scholar
Luria, Alexander R. 1981. Language and Cognition. Edited by James V. Wertsch. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Longhurst, C. A. 2011. “Unamuno, Schleirmacher, Humboldt: A Question of Language.” Hispanic Review, Autumn: 573–591.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Master, Alfred. 1946. “The Influence of Sir William Jones upon Sanskrit Studies.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 11(4): 798–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matilal, Bimal Krishna. 1981. “Error and Truth: Classical Indian Theories.” Philosophy East and West. 18: 321–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. “Śābdabodha and the Problem of Knowledge-Representation in Sanskrit.” Journal of Indian Philosophy. 16: 107–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. The Word and the World: India’s Contribution to the Study of Language. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McElvenny, James. 2016. “The Fate of Form in Tradition.” Language and Communication 47: 30–42.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Jitendra N. 1993. Essays on Indian Philosophy Traditional and Modern, ed. by Purush-ottama Bilimoria. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt and Messling, Markus. 2017. “Wilhelm von Humboldt.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta.Google Scholar
Müller, F. Max. 1869. Lectures on the Science of Language. From the 2nd London ed. rev. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Murti, Tiruppattur Ramesehayyar Venkatachala. 1974.“ Some Comments on the Philosophy of Language in the Indian Context ” Journal of Indian Philosophy. 2: 321–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. Studies in Indian Thought: Collected Papers of Prof. T. R V.Murti, ed. by Harold G. Coward.Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Pajevic, Marko. 2014. “Translation and Poetic Thinking.” German Life and Letters 67: 6–21.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pānini. 1897. Ashtadhyayi. Translated by Srisa Chandra Vasu. Benares.Google Scholar
Pillai, K. Raghavan. 1971. “Translator’s note on Karika 145.” In Vākyapadīya: Critical Text of Cantos I and II. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 2009. “Future Philology? The Fate of a Soft Science in a Hard World.” Critical Inquiry. 35: 931–961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in General Linguistics, ed. by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, Translated by Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1849. On the Language and Wisdom of the Indians. Translated by E. Millington. London: Henry G. Bohn.Google Scholar
Shastri, Gaurinath. 1974. A Concise History of Classical Sanskrit Literature. Delhi: MotilalGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. Mark. 2009. “The Rippling of Verschiedenheit: Wilhelm von Humboldt on Philology, Usage and Intra-linguistic Diversity.” European Romantic Review 20(2): 237–245.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev. 1986. Thought and Language. Translated by Alex Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Introducing Language and Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 1(1): 1–3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, Friedrich. 1961. “The German Response to Indian Culture.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 81(4): 395–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Săftoiu, Răzvan
2019. The Dialogic Turn in Language Study. Language and Dialogue 9:3 ► pp. 471 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.