The chapter looks at dialogicity in written language use, focusing on how expert knowledge is recontextualized in different action games. Using a corpus of journal articles, newspaper columns and blog posts by the same author (Paul Krugman), the analysis centres on: (a) participants (the expert community, the writer and the reader), (b) communicative action and (c) the evaluative dialogue between writer and reader. The study highlights that research action games take scholarly debates as their starting point and involve the expert community, while knowledge dissemination recontextualizes expert argument in a wider participation framework: columns highlight the authority of the writer by presenting a self-contained argument; blogs present the post as the opening move of a polylogue addressing different participants.
1993Analysing Genre. Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
2012 “Disagreements and agreements in personal/diary blogs: A closer look at responsiveness.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1607–1622.
1997 “Reported argument in economics textbooks. A meta-pragmatics of argumentative dialogue”. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of linguists, ed. by Bernard Caron, Paper 41 (CD). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
2010 “Metadiscursive practices in introductions: Phraseology and semantic sequences across genres.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2): 99–123.
2014 “Integrating corpus and genre approaches: Phraseology and voice across EAP genres.” In Corpus Analysis for Descriptive and Pedagogic Purposes: English Specialised Discourse, ed. by Maurizio Gotti and Davide Simone Giannoni, 43–62. Bern: Peter Lang.
2017 “Corpus Linguistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 46–61. London: Routledge.
Forthcoming. “Try to prove me wrong: Dialogicity and audience involvement in economics blogs.” Discourse, Context and Media.
Bondi, Marina and Giuliana Diani
2015 “I am wild about cabbage: Evaluative ‘semantic sequences’ and cross-linguistic (dis)continuities.” Nordic Journal of English Studies (NJES), 14(1): 116–151.
Bondi, Marina and Corrado Seidenari
2012 “And now I’m finally of the mind to say I hope the whole ship goes down …: Markers of subjectivity and evaluative phraseology in blogs.” In Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English, ed. by Joybrato Mukherjee and Magnus Huber, 17–27. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2003 “This mystery: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 313–326.
2006 “The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses.” Applied Linguistics 27(3): 492–518.
1989Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.
1989 “Controversies as quasi-dialogues.” In Dialoganalyse II, ed. by Edda Weigand and Franz Hundsnurcher, 147–159. Tubingen: Narr.
2005a “Nowhere has anyone attempted … in this article I aim to do just that: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines”. Journal of Pragmatics 37(8): 1207–1231.
2005b “We do not seem to have a theory …the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing”. Applied Linguistics 26(3): 343–375.
Herring, Susan, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen
(ed.)2013Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: DeGruyter.
Hewings, Anne, Theresea Lillis, and Dimitra Vladimirou
2010 “Who’s citing whose writings? A corpus-based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English-medium national and English-medium international journals.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 102–115.
Hunston, Susan and Geoffrey Thompson
(ed.)2000Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1994 “Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, 191–218. London: Routledge.
2000 “Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts”. In Evaluation in Text, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoffrey Thompson, 176–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2004 “It has rightly been pointed out: Attribution, Consensus and Conflict in Academic Discourse.” In Academic Discourse, Genre and Small Corpora, ed. by Marina Bondi, Laura Gavioli and Marc Silver, 15–33. Rome: Officina.
2009Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hyland, Ken and Jiang Feng
2016 “We must conclude that …: A diachronic study of academic engagement.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 24: 29–42.
Kwan, Becky and Hang Chan
2014 “An investigation of source use in the results and the closing sections of empirical articles in information systems: In search of a functional-semantic citation typology for pedagogical purposes”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14: 29–47.
2003 “Student writing as ‘academic literacies’: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design.” Language and Education 17(3): 192–207.
2011 “Legitimizing dialogue as textual and ideological goal in academic writing for assessment and publication”. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 10(4): 401–432.
2008 “Genres in contrast: The exploration of writers’ visibility in research articles and research article abstracts.” In English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication, ed. by Sally Burgess and Pedro Martín Martín, 105–122. Bern: Peter Lang.
Luzón, Maria José
2013 “Public communication of science in blogs: Recontextualizing scientific discourse for a diversified audience.” Written Communication 30(4): 428–457.
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, Jim and Peter White
2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
2010 “Discourse reflexivity: A discourse universal? The case of ELF”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2): 13–40.
2013 “Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 13(1): 7–36.
Mur Dueñas, Pilar
2008 “Analysing engagement markers cross-culturally: The case of English and Spanish business management research articles.” In English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication, ed. by Sally Burgess and Pedro Martín Martín, 197–213. Bern: Peter Lang.
Nølke, Henning, Kjersti Fløttum, and Coco Norén
2004La ScaPoLine. La théorie scandinave de la polyphonie linguistique. Paris: Kimé.
2006 “Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing.” English for Specific Purposes 25(1): 4–29.
2012WordSmith Tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
Sinclair, John Mc. H.
1982 “Planes of discourse.” In The Two-fold Voice: Essays in Honour of Ramesh Mohan, ed. by S. N. A. Rizvi, 70–89. Hyderabad: Pitambar Publishing Company.
1985 “On the integration of linguistic description”. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 13–28. London: Academic Press.
1996 “The search for units of meaning.” Textus 9(1): 75–106.
2004Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.
Trushchelev, Pavel N., Elena V. Petrenko & Larisa A. Piotrovskaya
2023. Conceptualizing emotions through discourse: a pragmatic view on the reader's interest. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent 14:2 ► pp. 93 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.