The effects of telicity, dynamicity and punctuality in L2 acquisition of Spanish Preterit and Imperfect
The aim of this work is to investigate the use of Spanish Preterit and Imperfect by English speaking learners of L2 Spanish following the Lexical Aspect Hypothesis (
Andersen & Shirai, 1996;
Díaz, Bel, & Bekiou, 2008;
Domínguez, Tracy-Ventura, Arche, Mitchell, & Miles, 2013;
González, 2003,
2013;
Montrul & Slabakova, 2002). The article studies how aspectual features bias Preterit and Imperfect in initial, intermediate and advanced learners. The results, based on an approximate binomial distribution analysis, confirm that Preterit is the preferred past, which supports L1 transfer (
Salaberry & Shirai, 2002). The results also verify that Preterit is biased by dynamicity and punctuality at all levels. Telicity effects come into play in intermediate levels, while punctuality effects are reinforced in advanced levels. Stativity influences the use of Imperfect in intermediate level, which reveals that there are differences in the bias effect regarding proficiency level.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Aspect
- 3.Grammatical aspect in Spanish and English
- 4.Aspectual features in interlanguage hypotheses
- 5.Study
- 5.1Participants
- 5.2Methodology
- 5.3Results
- 5.3.1Use of past tenses
- 5.3.2Use of Preterit
- 5.3.2.1Dynamicity effects with Preterit
- 5.3.2.2Telicity effects with Preterit
- 5.3.2.3Punctuality effects with Preterits
- 5.3.3Use of Imperfect
- 5.3.3.1Stativity effects with Imperfect
- 5.3.3.2Durativity effects with Imperfect
- 5.3.3.3Atelicity effects with Imperfect
- 6.Discussion and conclusion
-
References
References (26)
References
Andersen, R., & Shirai, Y. (1996). Primacy of aspect in language acquisition. In W. Ritchie, & T. Bathia (Eds.), Handbook of Second language Acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego: Academic Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Anecdote or evidence? Evaluating support for hypotheses concerning the development of tense and aspect. In E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research Methodology in SLA (pp. 41–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of Language. Ann Harbor, Mich.: Karoma Press.
Comajoan, Ll. (2013). Tense and Aspect in Second Language Spanish. In K. L. Geeslin (Ed.), The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235–252). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Díaz, L., Bel, A., & Bekiou, K. (2008). Interpretable and uninterpretable features in the acquisition of Spanish past tenses. In J. Muñoz Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds), The role of formal features in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 484–512). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Domínguez, L., Arche, M., & Myles, F. (2017). Spanish Imperfect revisited: Exploring L1 influence in the reassembly of imperfective features onto new L2 forms. Second Language Research, 33(4), 431–457.
Domínguez, L., Tracy-Ventura, N., Arche, M., Mitchell, R., & Miles, F. (2013). The role of dynamic contrasts in the L2 acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 558–577.
Engelberg, S. (1999). The magic of the moment: what it means to be a punctual verb. Proceedings of the 25th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 109–121.
Gavruseva, E. (2002). Is there primacy of aspect in child L2 English? Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 5(2), 109–30.
González, P., & Quintana Hernández, L. (2018). Inherent aspect and L1 transfer in the L2 acquisition of Spanish grammatical aspect. Modern Language Journal, 102(3), 611–625.
González, P. (2003). Aspects on aspect. Theory and applications of grammatical aspect in Spanish. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.
González, P. (2013). Research design: A two-way predicational system is better than a four-way approach. In R. M. Salaberry, & Ll. Comajoan (Eds), Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect (pp. 159–186). Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2012). The acquisition of interpretable features In L2 Spanish: Personal a. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 701–720.
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227.
Moens, M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Journal of Computational Linguistics, 14(2), 15–28.
Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2002). The L2 acquisition of morphosyntactic and semantic properties of the aspectual tenses preterite and imperfect. In A. T. Pérez Lerroux, & J. Muñoz Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax (pp. 115–151). Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands.
Salaberry, R. (2000). The development of past tense morphology in L2 Spanish. Studies in Bilingualism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. Philosophical review, 661, 143–160.
Verkuyl, H. (1993). A theory of aspectuality. The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge studies in linguistics 64. Cambridge: CUP.
Vincendeau, S. (1995). Paroles en l’air. Francia.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Thane, Patrick D.
2023.
Frequency matters in second language acquisition too! Frequency effects in the production of preterit morphology with state verbs in Spanish second language learners and heritage speakers.
Lingua 295
► pp. 103611 ff.
Comajoan-Colomé, Llorenç & Ares Llop Naya
2021.
An SLA-Informed and Cognitive Linguistic Approach to the Teaching of L2 Catalan Tense-Aspect.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 87
► pp. 95 ff.
Quintana Hernández, Lucía & Beatriz Rodríguez Arrizabalaga
2021.
Tiempo, aspecto y modo en segundas lenguas (TAML2). Estudios recientes de Lingüística Aplicada.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 87
► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.