Proximate and ultimate explanations of individual differences in language use and language acquisition
Jan Hulstijn | University of Amsterdam
I evaluate three schools in linguistics (structuralism; generative linguistics; usage based linguistics) from the perspective of Karl Popper’s critical rationalism. Theories (providing proximate explanations) may be falsified at some point in time. In contrast, metatheories, such as Darwin’s theory of evolution and the theory of Language as a Complex Adaptive System (LCAS) (providing ultimate explanations) are falsifiable in principle, but not likely to be falsified. I then argue that LCAS provides a fruitful framework for the explanation of individual differences in language acquisition and use. Unequal frequency distributions of linguistic elements constitute a necessary characteristic of language production, in line with LCAS. However, explaining individual differences implies explaining commonalities (Hulstijn, 2015, 2019). While attributes such as people’s level of education and profession are visible in knowledge of the standard language (declarative knowledge acquired in school), they may be invisible in the spoken vernacular (linguistic cognition shared by all native speakers).
Keywords: basic language cognition, language as a complex adaptive system, Darwin’s theory of evolution, falsifiability, theory versus metatheory, individual differences, language use, language acquisition
Article outline
- 1.Proximate and ultimate explanations in linguistics and psychology
- 1.1Three paradigms in linguistics and psychology
- 1.2Popper (1902–1994): Critical rationalism
- 1.3Chomsky: Generative linguistics
- 1.4Usage-based linguistics
- 1.5Theory and metatheory: Proximate and ultimate explanations
- 2.Explaining individual differences under the view of LCAS
- 2.1Basic and extended language cognition
- 2.2Vernacular versus standard language
- 2.3Individual differences work out differently in control of the vernacular and in control of the standard language
- 2.4Language assessment
- 3.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 06 April 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.19027.hul
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.19027.hul
References
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
Bod, R.
Bradie, M.
Bybee, J. L.
Bybee, J. L., & Hopper, P. J.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N.
Croft, W.
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
Diessel, H.
Ellis, N. C.
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
Goldberg, A. E.
Han, Z.-H.
Haspelmath, M.
submitted). Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondencies and predictability.
Hulstijn, J. H.
(1999) Vaardigheid zonder kennis? De rol van grammaticakennis en automatisering in de verwerving van een tweede taal. [Proficiency without knowledge? The role of knowledge of grammar and automatization in the acquisition of a second language] Inaugural lecture, University of Amsterdam 5 November 1999 Amsterdam: Vossiuspers AUP.
(2017) Syntactic patterns in the speech of native speakers of Dutch, differing in age and level of education and profession: A pilot study exploring the size of shared language knowledge. Linguistics in Amsterdam, 10, 1, 60–90. [http://www.linguisticsinamsterdam.nl/home?issue=101]
Hulstijn, J. H., Ellis, R., & Eskildsen, S.
Larsen-Freeman, D.
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. H.
MacWhinney, B.
Miller, G. A.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H.
Mufwene, S. S., Coupé, C., & Pellegrino, F.
Mulder, K., & Hulstijn, J. H.
Neal, T., Sundararajan, K., Fatima, A., Yan, Y., Xiang, Y., & Woodard, D.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H.
Piantadosi, S. T.
Potha, N., & Stamatatos, E.
Robins, R. H.
Rooryck, J.
Shearmur, J., & Stokes, G.
Tallerman, M., & Gibson, K. R.
The Five Graces Group (Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., Schoenemann, T.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B.
Tinbergen, N.
Tomasello, M.
Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.
Van Geert, P.
Full-text
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Han, ZhaoHong
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.