Proximate and ultimate explanations of individual differences in language use and language acquisition
I evaluate three schools in linguistics (structuralism; generative linguistics; usage based linguistics) from the perspective of Karl Popper’s critical rationalism. Theories (providing proximate explanations) may be falsified at some point in time. In contrast, metatheories, such as Darwin’s theory of evolution and the theory of Language as a Complex Adaptive System (LCAS) (providing ultimate explanations) are falsifiable in principle, but not likely to be falsified. I then argue that LCAS provides a fruitful framework for the explanation of individual differences in language acquisition and use. Unequal frequency distributions of linguistic elements constitute a necessary characteristic of language production, in line with LCAS. However, explaining individual differences implies explaining commonalities (Hulstijn, 2015, 2019). While attributes such as people’s level of education and profession are visible in knowledge of the standard language (declarative knowledge acquired in school), they may be invisible in the spoken vernacular (linguistic cognition shared by all native speakers).
Article outline
- 1.Proximate and ultimate explanations in linguistics and psychology
- 1.1Three paradigms in linguistics and psychology
- 1.2Popper (1902–1994): Critical rationalism
- 1.3Chomsky: Generative linguistics
- 1.4Usage-based linguistics
- 1.5Theory and metatheory: Proximate and ultimate explanations
- 2.Explaining individual differences under the view of LCAS
- 2.1Basic and extended language cognition
- 2.2Vernacular versus standard language
- 2.3Individual differences work out differently in control of the vernacular and in control of the standard language
- 2.4Language assessment
- 3.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(
1989)
Functionalism and the Competition Model. In
B. MacWhinney, &
E. Bates (Eds.),
The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bloomfield, L.
(
1935)
Language. London: Allen & Unwin.
Bod, R.
(
2015)
Probabilistic linguistics. In
B. Heine, &
H. Narrog (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 663–692). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bradie, M.
(
2016)
Karl Popper’s evolutionary philosophy. In
J. Shearmur, &
G. Stokes (Eds.),
The Cambridge companion to Popper (pp. 143–169). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. L.
(
2007)
Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J. L., & Hopper, P. J.
Chomsky, N.
(
1957)
Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N.
(
1965)
Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N.
(
1980)
Rules and representations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Chomsky, N.
(
1981)
Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Chomsky, N.
(
2005)
Three factors in language design.
Linguistic Inquiry, 361, 1–22.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N.
(
2016)
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 391, 1–19.
Croft, W.
(
2001)
Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R.
(
2005)
Simpler syntax. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(
2005)
An introduction to second language acquisition: Dynamic aspects. London, UK: Routledge.
Diessel, H.
(
2019)
The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, N. C.
(
2002)
Frequency effects in language processing and acquisition.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 143–88.
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(Eds.) (
2009)
Language as a complex adaptive system.
Language Learning, 591,
Supplement 1.
Goldberg, A. E.
(
2013)
Constructionist approaches to language. In
T. Hoffmann, &
G. Trousdale (Eds.)
Handbook of construction grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Han, Z.-H.
(Ed.) (
2019)
Profiling learner language as a dynamic system. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Haspelmath, M.
submitted).
Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondencies and predictability.
Hawkins, J. A.
(
2004)
Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hawkins, J. A.
(
2014)
Cross-linguistic variation and efficiency. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hulstijn, J. H.
(
1999)
Vaardigheid zonder kennis? De rol van grammaticakennis en automatisering in de verwerving van een tweede taal. [
Proficiency without knowledge? The role of knowledge of grammar and automatization in the acquisition of a second language] Inaugural lecture, University of Amsterdam
5 November 1999 Amsterdam: Vossiuspers AUP.
Hulstijn, J. H.
(
2011)
Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment.
Language Assessment Quarterly, 81, 229–249.
Hulstijn, J. H.
(
2017)
Syntactic patterns in the speech of native speakers of Dutch, differing in age and level of education and profession: A pilot study exploring the size of shared language knowledge.
Linguistics in Amsterdam, 10, 1, 60–90. [
[URL]]
Hulstijn, J. H.
(
2019)
An individual-differences framework for comparing nonnative with native speakers: Perspectives from BLC Theory.
Language Learning, 691, Supplement 11, 157–183.
Hulstijn, J. H., Ellis, R., & Eskildsen, S.
(Eds.) (
2015)
Orders and sequences in the acquisition of L2 morphosyntax, 40 years on. Language Learning, 651 (special issue).
Hyams, N. M.
(
1986)
Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Keller, R.
(
1994)
On language change: The invisible hand in language. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Kuhn, T.
(
1962)
The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(
1997)
Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition.
Applied Linguistics, 181, 141–165.
Lestrade, S.
(
2017)
Unzipping Zipf’s law.
PLoS ONE, 12(8), e0181987.
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. H.
(
2019)
Individual differences and the ergodicity problem.
Language Learning, 691, Supplement 11, 184–206.
MacWhinney, B.
(
2015)
Introduction: Language emergence. In
B. MacWhinney, &
W. O’Grady (Eds.),
The handbook of language emergence (pp. 1–31). Chisester, UK: Wiley.
Miller, G. A.
(
2003)
The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective.
Trends in Cognitive Science, 71, 141–144.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H.
(
1960)
Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Mufwene, S. S., Coupé, C., & Pellegrino, F.
(
2017)
Complexity in language: A multifaceted phenomenon. In
S. S. Mufwene,
C. Coupé, &
F. Pellegrino (Eds.),
Complexity in language: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 1–29). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mulder, K., & Hulstijn, J. H.
(
2011)
Linguistic skills of adult native speakers, as a function of age and level of education.
Applied Linguistics, 321, 475–494.
Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J.
(
2019)
A problem in theory.
Nature Human Behaviour, 31, 221–229.
Neal, T., Sundararajan, K., Fatima, A., Yan, Y., Xiang, Y., & Woodard, D.
(
2018)
Surveying stylometry techniques and applications.
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(6), 86.
Newmeyer, F. J.
(
1998)
Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H.
(
1983)
Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar.
Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 551–579.
Piantadosi, S. T.
(
2014)
Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 211, 1112–1130.
Popper, K. R.
(
1959)
The logic of scientific discovery. London, UK: Hutchinson.
Potha, N., & Stamatatos, E.
(
2019)
Improving author verification based on topic modeling.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 701, 1074–1088.
Robins, R. H.
(
1990)
A short history of linguistics. Third ed. (first ed. 1967). London, UK: Longman.
Rooryck, J.
(
2006)
Generative grammar. In
K. Brown et al. (Eds.),
Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. 41 (pp. 767–769). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Shearmur, J., & Stokes, G.
(Eds.) (
2016)
The Cambridge companion to Popper. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Tallerman, M., & Gibson, K. R.
(
2012)
Introduction: The evolution of language. In
M. Tallerman, &
K. R. Gibson (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of language evolution (pp. 1–133). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
The Five Graces Group (Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., Schoenemann, T.
) (
2009)
Language is a complex adaptive system.
Language Learning, 591, Supplement 11, 1–26.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B.
(
1994)
A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Tinbergen, N.
(
1963)
On aims and methods of ethology.
Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 201, 410–433.
Tomasello, M.
(
2003)
Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.
(
2018)
Human evolution beyond biology and culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Van Geert, P.
(
1994)
Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. New York: Harvester.
Van Geert, P.
(
1998)
A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond.
Psychological Review, 51, 634–677.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Han, ZhaoHong
2020.
Usage-based instruction, systems thinking, and the role of Language Mining in second language development.
Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.