Article published in:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 4:2 (2015) ► pp. 222240
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Akbıyık, Seda, Ayşenur Karaduman, Tilbe Göksun & Anjan Chatterjee
2018. The relationship between co-speech gesture production and macrolinguistic discourse abilities in people with focal brain injury. Neuropsychologia 117  pp. 440 ff. Crossref logo
Azar, Zeynep, Ad Backus & Aslı Özyürek
2019. General- and Language-Specific Factors Influence Reference Tracking in Speech and Gesture in Discourse. Discourse Processes 56:7  pp. 553 ff. Crossref logo
Azar, Zeynep, Aslı Özyürek & Ad Backus
2020. Turkish-Dutch bilinguals maintain language-specific reference tracking strategies in elicited narratives. International Journal of Bilingualism 24:2  pp. 376 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Ariel, M.
(1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berman, R.A., & Slobin, D.I.
(1994) Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Carminati, M.N.
(2002) The processing of Italian subject pronouns. PhD Thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.L.
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, defmiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, B.
(1996) ‘Pragmatic weight’ and Spanish subject pronouns: The pragmatic and discourse uses of ‘tú and yo’ in spoken Madrid Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 543–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Debreslioska, S., Özyürek, A., Gullberg, M., & Perniss, P.
(2013) Gestural viewpoint signals referent accessibility. Discourse Processes, 50(7), 431–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demir, O.E., So, W.-C., Özyürek, A., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2012) Turkish- and English-speaking children display sensitivity to perceptual context in the referring expressions they produce in speech and gesture. Language and Cognitive Processess, 27(6), 844–867. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doğruöz, A.S.
(2007) Synchronic variation and diachronic change in Dutch Turkish: A corpus based analysis. Ph.D. Thesis. Tilburg University
Enç, M.
(1986) Topic switching and pronominal subjects in Turkish. In D.I. Slobin & K. Zimmer (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (pp. 195–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erguvanlı, E.
(1984) The function of word order in Turkish grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Erguvanlı-Taylan, E.
(1986) In D.I. Slobin & K. Zimmer (Eds), Typological Studies in Language (8): Studies in Turkish Linguistics: proceedings of the third conference on Turkish linguistics (pp. 209–231). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Furman, R., Kuntay, A., & Özyürek, A.
(2014) Early language-specificity of children’s event encoding in speech and gesture: Evidence from caused motion in Turkish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 620–634.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(1983) Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 1–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
(1975) Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds), Syntax and semantics volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York : Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M.
(2003) Gestures, referents, and anaphoric linkage in learner varieties. In C. Dimroth & M. Starren (Eds.), Information structure, linguistic structure and the dynamics of language acquisition (pp. 311–328). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Handling discourse: Gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language learning, 56(1), 155–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B.
(2010) Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Pronominal subjects in bilingual Turkish. Second Language Research, 26(3), 355–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H.
(1999) Cohesion and form in children’s narratives: a comparison of English, French, German, and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 26, 419–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A., & Müller, N.
(2000) Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 227–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerslake, C.
(1987) In E.H. Boeschoten & L.Th. Verhoeven (Eds), Studies on modern Turkish: Proceedings of the third conference on Turkish linguistics (pp. 91–104). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Kita, S., Van der Hulst, H., & Van Gijn, I.
(1998) Movement phase in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcriptions by human coders. In I. Wachsmuth & M. Fröhlich (Eds), Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 23–35). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A.
(2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Küntay, A., & Özyürek, A.
(2002) Joint attention and the development of the use of demonstrative pronouns in Turkish. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A.H. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 336–347). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H.
(2009) Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 41(3), 841–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levy, E., & Fowler, C.
(2000) Grounding references in perception. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gerture (pp. 215–234). New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.
(1987) Pragmatics and the grammar of form: A partial pragmatic reduction of Binding and Control phenomena. Linguistics 23, 379–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., & Levy, E.
(1993) Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes, 16, 363–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2004) The acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A.
(2002) Speech-gesture relationship across languages and in second language learners: Implications for spatial thinking and speaking. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A.H. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 500–509). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Perniss, P.M., & Özyürek, A.
(2015) Visible cohesion: A comparison of reference tracking in sign, speech, and co-speech gesture. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(1), 36–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, A.
(1992) Language aquisition and syntactic theory: A comparative analysis of French and English child language. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M.
(1995) Cross-linguistic parallels in language loss. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 14(1–2), 88–123.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S.
(2004) Crosslinguistic influence at the syntaxpragmatic interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 183–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
So, W.C., Kita, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2009) Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: Speech and gesture go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science, 33, 115–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoshioka, K.
(2008) Gesture and information structure in first and second language. Gesture, 8(2), 236–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar