Article In:
The Evolution of Expletives: Theoretical and diachronic perspectives
Edited by Eric Fuß and Benjamin L. Sluckin
[Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 6:1/2] 2024
► pp. 157190
References (54)
References
(2009). The consolidation of verb-second in Old High German: What role did subject pronouns play? In P. Crisma & G. Longobardi (Eds.), Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory (pp. 128–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, P. (1994). La variazione sintattica. Studi di dialettologia romanza. Bologna: Il mulino.Google Scholar
(2007). I clitici fra fonologia e sintassi. In R. Maschi, N. Penello & P. Rizzolatti (Eds.), Miscellanea di studi linguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani (pp. 217–227). Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
Biberauer, T. & Roberts, I. (2010). Subjects, Tense and verb-movement. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory (pp. 263–302). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bidese, E. (2004). Die Zimbern und ihre Sprache: Geographische, historische und sprachwissenschaftlich relevante Aspekte. In T. Stolz (Ed.), Alte Sprachen: Beiträge zum Bremer Kolloquium über ‘Alte Sprachen und Sprachstufen’ (pp. 3–42). Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo; A., Tomaselli, "Diachronic Development in Isolation: The Loss of V2 Phenomena in Cimbrian" in LINGUISTISCHE BERICHTE, v. 2007, n. 2101 (2007), p. 209-228Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Die diachronische Syntax des Zimbrischen, Tuebingen: Gunter Narr, 2008.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo; Cognola, Federica; Padovan, Andrea (2012), "Zu einer neuen Verb-Zweit-Typologie in den germanischen Sprachen: der Fall des Zimbrischen und des Fersentalerischen" in Anreiter, P., Hajnal, I., Kienpointner, M. (a cura di), In simplicitate complexitas: Festgabe für Barbara Stefan zum 70. Geburtstag, Wien: Praesens Verlag, 2012, p. 69-86.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo; Padovan, Andrea; Tomaselli, Alessandra (2013), "Bilingual competence, complementizer selection, and mood in Cimbrian" in Abraham, W., Leiss, E. (a cura di), Dialektologie in neuem Gewand: Zu Mikro-/Varietätenlinguistik, Sprachenvergleich und Universalgrammatik, Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag, 47-58.Google Scholar
Bidese, E. (2021). Introducing Cimbrian. The main linguistic features of a German(ic) language in Italy. Energeia 461, 19–62.Google Scholar
(2023). Sprachkontakt generativ: Eine Untersuchung kontaktbedingten syntaktischen Wandels im Zimbrischen. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bidese, E. & Schallert, O. (2018). Partikelverben und sekundäre Prädikative im Zimbrischen. In S. Rabanus (Ed.), Deutsch als Minderheitensprache in Italien. Theorie und Empirie kontaktinduzierten Sprachwandels (pp. 145–182). Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Bidese, E. & Tomaselli, A. (2018). Developing pro-drop: The case of Cimbrian. In F. Cognola & J. Casalicchio (Eds.), Null Subjects in Generative Grammar: A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective (pp. 52–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2016). The decline of asymmetric word order in Cimbrian subordination and the special case of umbrómm . In I. Reich & A. Speyer (Eds.), Co- and subordination in German and other languages (pp. 55–75). Hamburg: Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Bidese, E., Padovan, A. & Tomaselli, A. (2020). Rethinking Verb Second and Nominative case assignment: New insights from a Germanic variety in Northern Italy. In R. Woods & S. Wolfe (Eds.), Rethinking Verb Second (pp. 575–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandi, L. & Cordin, P. (1981). Dialetti e italiano. Un confronto sul parametro del soggetto nullo. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 61, 33–89.Google Scholar
(1989). Two Italian Dialects and the Null Subject Parameter. In O. A. Jaeggli & K. J. Safir (Eds.), The Null Subject Parameter (pp. 111–42). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugmann, K. (1917). Der Ursprung des Scheinsubjekts ‘es’ in den germanischen und den romanischen Sprachen. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königl. Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig [Philologisch-historische Klasse] 691. Band 5. Heft: 1–57.Google Scholar
Casalicchio, J. & Cordin, P. (2020). Grammar of Central Trentino. A Romance Dialect from North-East Italy. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cordin, P., Rabanus, S., Alber, B., Mattei, A., Casalicchio, J., Tomaselli, A., Bidese, E. & Padovan, A. (2018). VinKo, Versione 2 (20.12.2018, 09:20). Korpus im Text, Serie A, 13739 1. url: [URL]
Curme, G. O. (1922). A Grammar of the German Language. Revised and Enlarged Edition. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Fuß, E. (2018). Vorfeld-expletives in the history of German. Paper presented at Sentence Grammar and Discourse Grammar III, University of Göttingen.
Fuß, Eric & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2022. On the historical development of pronouns referring to situations: the case of so-called ‘expletives’ in Germanic. Ms., Universities of Bochum & Venice.Google Scholar
Fuß, E. & Hinterhölzl, R. (2023). On the historical development of pronouns referring to situations: the case of so-called ‘expletives’ in Germanic. Journal of Historical Syntax, 7.21, 1–54.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, G. & Poletto, C. (2009). The hybrid complementizer system of Cimbrian. In V. Moscati & E. Servidio (Eds.), Proceedings XXXV Incontro di Grammatica Generativa (pp. 181–194). Siena: Centro Interdipartimentale di Studi Cognitivi sul Linguaggio.Google Scholar
(2011). Hidden verb second: the case of Cimbrian. In M. T. Putnam (Ed.), Studies on German language-islands (pp. 301–346). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Relative clauses in Cimbrian. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, Strategies and Beyond. Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (pp. 393–416). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guardiano, C., Michelioudakis, D., Ceolin, A., Irimia, M. A., Longobardi, G., Radkevich, N., Silvestri, G. & Sitaridou, I. (2016). South by Southeast. A syntactic approach to Greek and Romance microvariation. L’Italia dialettale LXXVII1, 95–166.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (2015). Verb Second. In T. Kiss & A. Alexiadou (Eds.), Syntax — Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, vol. II1 (pp. 342–382). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hulk, A. & van Kemenade, A. (1995). Verb Second, Pro-Drop, Functional Projections and Language Change. In A. Battye & I. G. Roberts (Eds.), Clause Structure and Language Change (pp. 227–256). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, G. (2018). Relative Markers in Mennonite Low German: Their Forms and Functions. In A. Speyer & P. Rauth (Eds.), Syntax aus Saarbrücker Sicht 2. Beiträge der SaRDiS-Tagung zur (pp. 109–148). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Kruijt, A., Cordin, P. & Rabanus, S. (2023). On the validity of crowdsourced data. In E. Pustka, C. Quijada Van den Berghe & V. Weiland (Eds.), Corpus Dialectology (pp. 10–33). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Light, C. (2015). Expletive there in West Germanic. In T. Biberauer & G. Walkden (Eds.), Syntax over Time. Lexical, Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions (pp. 17–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R. & Savoia, L. M. (2005). I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Padovan, A. (2011). Diachronic Clues to Grammaticalization Phenomena in the Cimbrian CP. In M. T. Putnam (Ed.), Studies on German language-islands (pp. 279–300). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padovan, A., Bidese, E. & A. (2021). Circumventing the ‘That-Trace’ Effect: Different Strategies between Germanic and Romance. Languages 6.21, 08401–08413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padovan, A., Tomaselli, A., Bergstra, M., Corver, N., Etxepare, R. & Dold, S. (2016). Minority languages in language contact situations: three case studies on language change. Us Wurk 65.3/4, 146–174.Google Scholar
Panieri, L., Pedrazza, M., Nicolussi Baiz, A., Hipp, S., & Pruner, C. (2006). Bar lirnen z’schreiba un zo reda az be biar. Grammatica del cimbro di Luserna. Grammatik der zimbrischen Sprach von Lusérn. Trento/Luserna: Regione Autonoma Trentino-Alto Adige/Autonome Region Trentino-Südtirol — Istituto Cimbro/Kulturinstitut Lusérn.Google Scholar
Poletto, C. (1993). Subject clitic/verb inversion in north eastern Italian dialects. Working Papers in Linguistics 3/11, 95–137.Google Scholar
(2000). The Higher Functional Field. Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). More than one way out. On the factors influencing the loss of V to C movement. Linguistic Variation 19.11, 47–81 [Special Issue: C. Meklenborg Salvesen (eds.), A micro-perspective on Verb Second in Romance and Germanic]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabanus, S., Tomaselli, A., Padovan, A., Kruijt, A., Alber, B., Cordin, P., Zamparelli, R. & Vogt, B. M. (2021). VInKo (Varieties in Contact) Corpus. Eurac Research CLARIN Centre. [URL]
Renzi, L. & Vanelli, L. (1983). I pronomi soggetto in alcune varietà romanze. In P. Benincà, M. Cortelazzo, C. Marcato, A. L. Prosdocimi, L. Vanelli & A. Zamboni (Eds.), Scritti linguistici in onore di G.B. Pellegrini (pp. 121–145). Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Richards, M. & Biberauer, T. (2005). Explaining Expl. In M. den Dikken & C. Tortora (Eds.), The Function of Function Words and Functional Categories (pp. 115–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian Syntax, Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986). On the status of subject clitics in Romance. In O. Jaeggli & C. Silva-Corvalan (Eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics (pp. 391–419). Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Residual V2 and the WH-Criterion. In A. Belletti & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads (pp. 63–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I. (2010a). Agreement and Head Movement. Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b). Varieties of French and the Null Subject Parameter. In: T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory (pp. 1–57). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, A. (2023). Dal particolare all’universale. Viaggio nella grammatical del cimbro. Verona: QuiEdit.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, A. & Bidese, E. (2019). Subject clitic languages in comparison. Subject clitics, finite verb movement, and nominative case assignment in Germanic (Bavarian, Cimbrian) and Romance (French, North Italian) varieties. In E. Bidese, J. Casalicchio & M. C. Moroni (Eds.), La linguistica vista dalle Alpi. Teoria, lessicografia e multilinguismo — Linguistic views from the Alps. Language Theory, Lexicography and Multilingualism (pp. 43–61). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2023). Fortune and Decay of Lexical Expletives in Germanic and Romance along the Adige River. Languages 8(1) 441, 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomaselli, A., Bidese, E. & Padovan, A. (2022). Feature Borrowing in Language Contact. Languages 7(4), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar