References
Acedo-Matellan, V. (2016). The
morphosyntax of transitions: A case study in Latin and other
languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Acedo-Matellan, V. & Mateu, J. (2014). From
syntax to roots: A syntactic approach to root
interpretation. In A. Alexiadou, H. Borer & F. Schäfer (Eds.), The
syntax of roots and the roots of
syntax (pp. 14–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Alexiadou, A. & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing
AGR : Word order, V-movement and
EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory,
16
(3), 491–539. 

Alexiadou, A. & Anagnostopoulou, E. (2001). The
subject-in-situ generalization and the role of Case in driving
computations. Linguistic
Inquiry,
32
(2), 193–231. 

Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer, F. (2015). External
arguments in transitivity
alterations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Alexiadou, A., Gehrke, B. & Schäfer, F. (2014). The
argument structure of adjectival participles
revisited. Lingua,
149
1, 118–138. 

Alexiadou, A. & Schäfer, F. (2011).
There-insertion:
An unaccusativity mismatch at the syntax-semantics
interface. In M. B. Washburn et al. (Eds.), Online
proceedings of
WCCFL
28
1. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
Belletti, A. (1988). The
case of unaccusatives. Linguistic
Inquiry,
19
(1), 1–34.
Belletti, A. (2004). Aspects
of the low IP
area. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The
structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic
structures (Vol. 21, pp. 16–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych
verbs and theta-theory. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory,
6
1, 291–352. 

Benincà, P. (1988). L’ordine
degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni
marcate. In L. Renzi, G. Salvi & A. Cardinaletti (Eds.), Grande
Grammatica Italiana di
Consultazione (pp. 115–225). Bologna: Il Mulino.
Bentley, D. & Cruschina, S. (2018). The
silent argument of broad focus: Typology and
predictions. Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics,
3
(1).
Bentley, D., Maria Ciconte, F. & Cruschina, S. (2015). Existentials
and locatives in Romance dialects of
Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Bhatt, R. & Pancheva, R. (2006). Implicit
arguments. In The
Blackwel l companion to
syntax (Vol. 21). Blackwell. 

Bhatt, R. & Pancheva, R. (2017). Implicit
arguments. In M. Everaert & H. C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The
Blackwel l companion to syntax (2nd
ed.). Blackwell. 

Bianchi, V. (1993). Subject
positions and e-positions. Quaderni del
Laboratorio di
Linguistica,
7
1, 51–69.
Biberauer, T. (2010). Semi
pro-drop languages, expletives, and expletive pro
reconsidered. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric
variation (p. 153–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I. & Sheehan, M. (2010). Parametric
variation: Null subjects in minimalist
theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biberauer, T. & Roberts, I. (2010). Subjects,
tense and
verb-movement. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric
variation: Null subjects in minimalist
theory (p. 263–303). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Birner, B. J. (1994). Information
status and word order: An analysis of English
inversion. Language,
70
(2), 233–259. 

Birner, B. J. (1996). The
discourse function of inversion in
English. New York/London: Taylor & Francis.
Bobaljik, J. D. (2008). Paradigms
(optimal and otherwise): A case for
scepticism. In A. Bachrach & A. Nevins (Eds.), Inflectional
identity (pp. 29–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Borschev, V. & Partee, B. H. (1998). Formal
and lexical semantics and the genitive in negated existential sentences in
Russian. In Bošković, S. Franks & W. Snyder (Eds.), Formal
approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Connecticut meeting
1997 (Vol. 61, p. 75–96). MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Bošković, Ž. (2011). On
valued uninterpretable
features. In S. Lima, K. Mullin & B. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 39th annual meeting of the north east linguistic
society (p. 109–120). University of Massachusetts Amherst: GLSA.
Bosse, S., Bruening, B. & Yamada, M. (2012). Affected
experiencers. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory,
30
(4), 1185–1230. 

Bowers, J. (1993). The
syntax of predication. Linguistic
Inquiry,
24
1, 591–656.
Bowers, J. (2010). Arguments
as relations. Cambridge, MA.: MIT University Press. 

Breivik, L. E. (1989). On
the causes of syntactic change in
English. In L. E. Breivik & E. H. Jahr (Eds.), Language
change. contributions to the study of its
causes (p. 29–70). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 

Bresnan, J. (1977). Variables
in the theory of
transformations. In P. Culicover, T. Wasow & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal
syntax (p. 157–196). New York: Academic Press.
Bresnan, J. (1994). Locative
Inversion and the architecture of universal
grammar. Language,
70
(1), 72–131. 

Brinton, L. J. & Stein, D. (1995). Functional
renewal. In Historical
linguistics, 1993: Selected papers from the 11th international conference on
historical linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 august
1993 (Vol. 1241, pp. 33–47). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Bruening, B. (2010). Language-particular
syntactic rules and constraints: English Locative Inversion and
do-support. Language,
86
(1), 43–84. 

Bruening, B. (2021). Locative
Inversion, PP Topicalization, and Weak Crossover in
English. Journal of
Linguistics, 1–19. 
Cardinaletti, A. (2004). Towards
a cartogrpahy of subject
positions. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The
structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic
structures (Vol. 21, pp. 115–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M. (1999). The
typology of structural deficiency: A case study of three classes of
pronouns. In Clitics
in the languages of Europe. Mouton de Gruyter. 

Carlson, G. (1977). A
unified analysis of the English bare
plural. Linguistics and
Philosophy,
1
1, 413–457. 

Chomsky, N. (1982). Some
concepts and consequences of the theory of government and
binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The
minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist
inquiries: the
framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step
by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard
Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation
by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken
Hale: A life in
language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

Chomsky, N. (2008). On
Phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational
issues in linguistic theory. essays in honor of Jean-Roger
Vergnaud (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

Cinque, G. (1995). Italian
syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, C. (1997). Local
economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Coopmans, P. (1989). Where
stylistic and syntactic processes meet: Locative Inversion in
English. Language,
65
(4), 728–751. 

Corr, A. (2016). Wide-focus
subject-verb inversion in Ibero-Romance: A locative
account. Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics,
1
(1), 207–236. 

Culicover, P. W. (2013). Topicalization,
inversion, and complementizers in English
(1992). In Explaining
syntax: Representations, structures, and
computation (p. 212–255). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Culicover, P. W. & Levine, R. D. (2001). Stylistic
Inversion in English: A
reconsideration. Natural Language &
Linguistic
Theory,
19
(2), 283–310. 

Deal, A. R. (2009). The
origin and content of expletives: Evidence from
“selection”. Syntax,
12
1, 285–323. 

Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites (No. 20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dobler, E. (2008a). ‘again’
and the structure of result
states. Proceedings of ConSOLE
XV,
1
1, 42–66.
Dobler, E. (2008b). Creating
as putting something into the
world. Proceedings of ConSOLE
XVI,
39
1, 39–50.
Erteschik-Shir, N. (1997). The
dynamics of focus
structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information
structure: The syntax-discourse
interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Erteschik-Shir, N. (2019). Stage
topics and their
architecture. In V. Molnár, V. Egerland & S. Winkler (Eds.), Architecture
of
topic (pp. 223–248). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 

Fischer, O., Kemenade, A. v., Koopman, W. & Wurff, W. v. d. (2001). The
syntax of early
English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Fischer, S. (2016). Existentials
vs. unaccusatives: The definiteness restriction in
Romance. In S. Fischer, T. Kupisch & E. Rinke (Eds.), Definiteness
effects: Bilingual, typological and diachronic
variation (pp. 301–332). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Folli, R. & Harley, H. (2019). A
head movement approach to Talmy’s
typology. Linguistic
Inquiry, 1–46. 

Freeze, R. (1992). Existentials
and other
locatives. Language,
68
(3), 553–595. 

Frey, W. (2004). A
medical topic position for
German. Linguistische
Berichte,
199
1, 153–190.
Grewendorf, G. (2002a). Left
Dislocation as movement. Georgetown
University Working Papers in Theoretical
Linguistics,
2
(31–81).
Grewendorf, G. (2002b). Minimalistische
syntax. Tübingen, Basel: Francke Verlag.
Grewendorf, G. (2009). The
left clausal periphery: Clitic Left Dislocation in Italian and Left
Dislocation in
German. In B. Shaer, P. Cook, W. Frey & C. Maienborn (Eds.), Dislocated
elements in discourse:syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic
perspectives (pp. 57–102). New York, London: Routledge.
Gundel, J. K. (1985). ‘shared
knowledge’ and topicality. Journal of
Pragmatics,
9
(1), 83–107. 

Gutzmann, D. & Castroviejo Miró, E. (2011). The
dimensions of
verum. In O. Bonami & P. C. Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical
issues in syntax and
semantics
8
1 (p. 143–165). Paris: Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique à Paris.
Haeberli, E. (2002a). Features,
categories and the syntax of a-positions: Cross-linguistic variation in the
Germanic
languages. Dordrecht: Springer. 

Haeberli, E. (2002b). Inflectional
morphology and the loss of V2 in
English. In D. Lightfoot (Ed.), Syntactic
effects of morphological
change (pp. 88–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Haider, H. (2010). The
syntax of
German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (1998). The
basic elements of argument structure. MIT
Working papers in
linguistics,
32
1, 73–118.
Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (2000). There-insertion
unaccusatives. (Ms. MIT)
Hartmann, J. M. (2008). Expletives
in existentials. English ‘there’ and German
‘da’. Utrecht: LOT.
Hinterhölzl, R. (2019). Subjects,
Topics, and Anchoring to the
Context. Syntax,
22
(2–3), 199–228. 

Hoekstra, T. (1988). Small
clause
results. Lingua,
74
(2–3), 101–139. 

Hoekstra, T. & Mulder, R. (1990). Unergatives
as copular verbs: Locational and existential
predication. The Linguistic
Review,
7
1, 1–79. 

Hole, D. & Fraser, K. (2019, November). At-issue
and not-at-issue in the swarm
alternation. (presentation
at Event Semantics
2019, Berlin)
Holmberg, A. (2000). Scandinavian
Stylistic Fronting: How any category can become an
expletive. Linguistic
Inquiry,
31
1, 445–483. 

Hooper, J. & Thompson, S. (1973). On
the Applicability of Root
Transformations. Linguistic
Inquiry,
4
1, 465–497.
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. (2002). The
Cambridge grammar of the English
language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Höhle, T. N. (1992). Über verum-fokus im
deutschen [about
verumfocus in german]. Linguistische Berichte
Sonderheft,
4
1, 112–141. 

Irwin, P. (2012). Unaccusativity
at the interfaces (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). New York University, New York, NY. (lingbuzz/001617)
Irwin, P. (2018). Existential
unaccusativity and new discourse
referents. Glossa,
3
(1).
Jayaseelan, K. A. (2001). IP-internal
topic and focus phrases. Studia
Linguistica,
55
(1), 39–75. 

Karttunen, L. (1973). Presuppositions
of compound sentences. Linguistic
Inquiry,
4
(2), 169–193.
Kiss, K. É. (1998). Identificational
focus versus information
focus. Language,
74
(2), 245–273. 

Klein, W. (1992). The
present perfect
puzzle. Language, 525–552. 

Ko, H. (2005). Syntax
of why-in-situ: Merge into [spec, cp] in the overt
syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory,
23
(4), 867–916. 

Kratzer, A. (1995). Stage
level and individual level
predicates. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The
generic
book (p. 125–175). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing
the external argument from its
verb. In J. Rooryck & L. A. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase
structure and the
lexicon (Vol. 331, pp. 109–138). Dordrecht: Kluwer. 

Lahousse, K. (2006). NP
subject inversion in French: two types, two
configurations. Lingua,
116
1, 424–461. 

Lahousse, K. (2007). Implicit
stage topics. Discour. Revue de linguistique,
psycholinguistique et
informatique,
1
1, 1–18. 

Lahousse, K. (2011). Quand
passent les cigognes. le sujet nominal postverbal en Français
moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information
structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of
discourse
referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Landau, I. (2010). The
locative syntax of
experiencers (No. 53). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levin, B. (1993). English
verb classes and alternations: A preliminary
investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity:
At the syntax-lexical semantics
interface (No. 261). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2013). Lexicalized
meaning and manner/result
complementarity. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke & R. Marín (Eds.), Subatomic
semantics of event
predicates (pp. 49–70). Dordrecht: Springer. 

Marantz, A. (1991). Case
and
licensing. In German Westphal, B. Ao & H.-R. Chae (Eds.), Proceesings
of
ESCOL (pp. 234–253). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Cornell Linguistics Club.
Mateu, J. & Acedo-Matellán, V. (2012). The
manner/result complementarity revisited: A syntactic
approach. In M. C. Cuervo & Y. Roberge (Eds.), The
end of argument
structure (pp. 209–228). Leiden: Brill. 

McFadden, T. (2004). The
position of morphological case in the
derivation (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Milsark, G. (1974). Existential
sentences in english (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Miyagawa, S. (2017). Agreement
beyond phi. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. 

Moro, A. (1997). The
raising of predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause
structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Ouali, H. (2008). On
C-to-T-feature transfer: The nature of agreement and anti-agreement in
Berber. In R. D’Alessandro, S. Fischer & G. H. Hrafnbjargarson (Eds.), Agreement
restrictions (pp. 159–180). Mouton de Gruyter. 

Ouali, H. (2011). Agreement,
pronominal clitics and negation in Tamazight
Berber. London: Continuum.
Partee, B. H. (1973). Some
structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in
English. The Journal of
Philosophy,
70
(18), 601–609. 

Partee, B. H. & Borschev, V. (2008). Existential
sentences, be, and the genitive of negation in
Russian. In I. Comorovski & K. von Heusinger (Eds.), Existence:
Semantics and
syntax (pp. 147–190). Dodrecht: Springer. 

Perlmutter, D. M. (1978). Impersonal
passives and the unaccusative
hypothesis. In 4th
annual meeting of the berkeley linguistics
society (pp. 157–190). 

Pinto, M. (1997). Licensing
and interpretation of inverted subjects in
Italian (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Utrecht University, Utrecht, NL.
Postal, P. M. (2004). Skeptical
linguistic
essays. Oxford: Oxord University Press. 

Preminger, O. (2011). Agreement
as a fallible operation (Unpublished
doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Preminger, O. (2014). Agreement
and its
failures (No. 68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Introducing
arguments (No. 49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

Radford, A. (2009). An
introduction to English
syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, M. & Biberauer, T. (2005). Explaining
expl. In M. den Dikken & T. Christina (Eds.), The
function of function words and functional
categories (p. 115–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues
in Italian
syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. 

Rizzi, L. (1986). Null
objects in Italian and the theory of
pro
. Linguistic
Inquiry,
17
1, 501–557.
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized
minimality. Cambridge, A.: MIT Press.
Rizzi, L. (2001). ‘on
the position “int (errogative)” in the left periphery of the
clause’. In G. Cinque & G. Salvi (Eds.), Current
studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo
Renzi (Vol. 591, p. 287–296). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 

Rizzi, L. (2005). On
some properties of subjects and
topics. In L. Brugè, G. Giusti, N. Munaro, W. Schweikert & G. Turano (Eds.), Contributions
to the xxx incontro di grammatica
generativa (p. 203–224). Venice: Cafoscarina.
Rizzi, L. (2018). Subjects,
topics and the interpretation of
pro
. In R. Petrosino, P. Cerrone & H. van der Hulst (Eds.), Beyond
the veil of Maya. from sounds to
structures (p. 510–529). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Rizzi, L. & Shlonsky, U. (2006). Satisfying
the subject criterion by a non subject: English Locative Inversion and heavy
NP shift. In M. Frascarelli (Ed.), Phases
of
interpretation (p. 341–361). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Roberts, I. (2010). Agreement
and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective
goals. MIT Press. 

Roeper, T. (1987). Implicit
arguments and the head-complement
relation. Linguistic
Inquiry,
18
1, 267–310.
Salzmann, M. (2011). Towards
a typology of Locative Inversion-Bantu, perhaps Chinese and English-but
beyond? Language and Linguistics
Compass,
5
(4), 169–189. 

Sheehan, M. (2007). The
EPP and null subjects in
Romance (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Newcastle University, Newcastle.
Shlonsky, U. (1997). Clause
structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic: An essay in comparative
Semitic syntax. Oxford, UK.: Oxford University Press. 

Sluckin, B. L. (2021). Non-canonical
subjects and subject positions: locative inversion, v2-violations, and
feature inheritance (Doctoral
dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Sprach- und literaturwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Berlin). 
Sluckin, B. L., Cruschina, S. & Martin, F. (2021). Locative
Inversion in Germanic and Romance: a conspiracy
theory. In C. Meklenborg & S. Wolfe (Eds.), Germanic
and Romance: Continuity and
Variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Sternefeld, W. (2006). Syntax:
Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung Des
deutschen. Mannheim: Stauffenburg.
Stowell, T. (1981). Origins
of phrase structure (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Svenonius, P. (2003). Limits
on P: filling in holes vs. falling in
holes. Nordlyd,
31
(2), 431–445.
Teixeira, J. (2016). Locative
Inversion and stage topics: a cross-linguistic
study. Discours. Revue de linguistique,
psycholinguistique et informatique. A Journal of Linguistics,
psycholinguistics and computational
linguistics,
19
1. 

Tortora, C. M. (1997). The
syntax and semantics of the weak
locative (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Deleware, Newark, DE.
Tortora, C. M. (2001). Evidence
for a null locative in
Italian. In C. Guglielmo & S. Giampaolo (Eds.), Current
studies in Italian syntax: essays offered to Lorenzo
Renzi (p. 313–326). London: Elsevier. 

van der Wal, J. (2021). The
BaSiS basics of information structure. Retrieved
from [URL] (Accessed: 01.09.2024)
von Stechow, A. (1996). The
different readings of wieder ‘again’: a structural
account. Journal of
Semantics,
13
(2), 87–138. 

Wood, J. (2015). Icelandic
morphosyntax and argument structure and linguistic
theory (Vol. 901). Berlin: Springer. 

Wood, J. & Marantz, A. (2017). The
interpretation of external
arguments. In R. D’Alessandro, I. Franco & À. J. Gallego (Eds.), The
verbal
domain (p. 255–278). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zhao, R. (2019). Deriving
the variation and constraints of the present
perfect. In A. van Alem, M. De Sisto, E. J. Kerr & J. Wall (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 27th conference of the student organization of linguistics in Europe
(21–23 february 2019, Humboldt-Universität zu
Berlin) (Vol. XXVII1, pp. 215–327). Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.
Zwart, J.-W. (1992). Dutch
expletives and small clause predicate
raising. Proceedings of the North East
Linguistic
Society,
22
1, 477–491.