Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 11:2 (2018) ► pp.169–199

The rhythms of narrative tension and its cultural satisfaction

Frank Miller’s 300

| Universidad de Alcalá
Critics reading narratives as progressions, that’s to say, from beginning to end, prefer to see meaning emerge as a result of the interaction between different elements in the narrative, rather than of the imposition of a priori cultural schemata. This article, however, argues for the possibility of using a priori cultural schemata, as long as these pass through the filters established by theories of narrative progression. To show how this is done, I will interpret Frank Miller’s comic 300 by letting a tool of cultural-semantic analysis interact with narrative tension in the form of suspense, curiosity, and surprise. I argue that the back and forth between narrative tension and the tool accounts not only for the content of the comic but also for its basic narrative rhythm.
Keywords: 300 , cultural-semantic tool, Frank Miller, modality, narrative progression, narrative rhythm, narrative tension
Article outline
  • 1.Theoretical preliminaries
  • 2.Bridging the gap between semantics and cultural schemata
    • 2.1A tool which originates in modal logic
    • 2.2From semantics towards culture
  • 3.Analyzing 300
    • 3.1Prolegomena
    • 3.2Curiosity 1 to 3
    • 3.3Suspense 1 to 5
    • 3.4Surprise
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00008.can
References (59)
References
Bal, Mieke. 2009. Narratology: Introduction into the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2011. The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Baroni, Raphaël. 2007. La tension narrative: suspense, curiosité et surprise. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
. 2011. Tensions et résolutions: musicalité de l’intrigue ou intrigue musicale? Cahiers de Narratologie 211: 1–13.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter. 1984. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Candel, Daniel. 2013a. Advanced literacy and the place of literary semantics in secondary education: A tool of fictional analysis. Semiotica 1951 (June): 305–330.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Moving possible world theory from logic to value. Poetics Today 34 (1–2): 177–231.Google Scholar
. 2013c. Literatur interpetieren – ein Analysetool. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
. 2016. Possible worlds in the history of the novel. Poetics Today 37 (1): 107–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candel, Daniel et al. 2017. Analyzing the fictional worlds of Pixar with an eye on digital humanities. Semiotica 2181 (September): 91–118. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candel, Daniel. 2018. A report on the reports of the Stanford Literary Lab: A reason why the digital humanities may find it difficult to change literary history. Semiotica, 2241 (September): 1–24.Google Scholar
Dannenberg, Hilary. 2008. Coincidence and Counterfactuality: Plotting Time and Space in Narrative Fiction. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doležel, Lubomír. 1998. Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Andreas. 2004. The notional structure of thesauruses. In Categorization in the History of English, Christian J. Kay and Jeremy J. Smith (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, David. 2012. Story-Telling and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
Herodotus. 1998. Histories. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hühn, Peter. 2016. The eventfulness of non-events. In Narrative Sequence in Contemporary Narratology, Raphaël Baroni & Françoise Revaz (eds). Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 37–47.Google Scholar
Kay, Christian. 2009. Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary: with Additional Material from “A Thesaurus of Old English”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Konyndyk, Kenneth. 1986. Introductory Modal Logic. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCloud, Scott. 1994. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
McKeon, Michael. 2002. The Origins of the English Novel: 1600–1740. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. The Secret History of Domesticity: Public, Private, and the Division of Knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Midgley, Mary. 1994. The Ethical Primate: Humans, Freedom and Morality. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Frank. 1999. 300. Milwaukee: Dark Horse.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Phelan, Jim. 1989. Reading People, Reading Plots: Character, Progression, and the Interpretation of Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. Experiencing Fiction: Judgments, Progressions, and the Rhetorical Theory of Narrative. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Pramaggiore, Maria & Tom Wallis. 2011. Film: A Critical Introduction. London: Laurence King.Google Scholar
Reichl, Susanne. 2009. Cognitive Principles, Critical Practice: Reading Literature at University. Vienna: Vienna University Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1968. Topics in Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Adam. 1999. Romantic and Victorian Long Poems: A Guide. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Ronen, Ruth. 1994. Possible Worlds in Literary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Des mondes possibles au-delà du principe de vérité. In La théorie littéraire des mondes possibles, Françoise Lavocat (ed.). Paris: CNRS Éditions, 189–202.Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Seaton, Douglas. 2005. Narrative in music: The case of Beethoven’s “Tempest” sonata. In Narratology Beyond Literary Criticism: Mediality, Disciplinarity, Jan Christoph Meister (ed.). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 65–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segal, Eyal. 2016. Ending twice over (or more): Alternate endings in narrative. In Narrative Sequence in Contemporary Narratology, Raphaël Baroni & Françoise Revaz (eds). Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 71–86.Google Scholar
Shen, Dan. 2013. Implied author: Authorial audience and context, form and history in neo-Aristotelian rhetorical theory. Narrative 21 (2): 140–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Style and Rhetoric of Short Narrative Fiction: Covert Progressions Behind Overt Plots. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2015. Dual textual dynamics and dual readerly dynamics: Double narrative movements in Mansfield’s “Psychology”. Style 49 (4): 411–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spiro, Rand J. 1980. Constructive processes in prose comprehension and recall. In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Rand J. Spiro et al. (eds). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 245–278.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Meir. 1978. Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. Telling in time (I): Chronology and narrative theory. Poetics Today 11 (4): 901–948. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Telling in time (II): Chronology, teleology, narrativity. Poetics Today 13 (3): 463–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. How narrativity makes a difference. Narrative 9 (2): 115–122.Google Scholar
. 2010. Narrativity: From objectivist to functional paradigm. Poetics Today 31 (3): 507–659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swift, Graham. 1983. Waterland. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Swirsky, Peter. 2010. Literature, Analytically Speaking: Explorations in the Theory of Interpretation, Analytic Aesthetics and Evolution. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1977. The Poetics of Prose. Ithaca: Cornell.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael. 2009. Narrative Progression in the Short Story: A Corpus Stylistic Approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Musical narrativity. In Narrative Sequence in Contemporary Narratology, Raphaël Baroni & Françoise Revaz (eds). Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 130–150.Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 1987. Death Is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vernay, Jean-François. 2014. The truth about fiction as possible worlds, Journal of Language, Literature and Culture 61 (2): 133–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Wright, George H. 1951. An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1988. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Wolf, Werner. 2005. Music and narrative. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, David Herman, Manfred Jahn & Marie-Laure Ryan (eds). New York: Routledge, 324–329.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Bermejo-Berros, Jesús, Jaime Lopez-Diez & Miguel Angel Gil Martínez
2022. Inducing narrative tension in the viewer through suspense, surprise, and curiosity. Poetics 93 ► pp. 101664 ff. DOI logo
Candel, Daniel
2020. Covert Progression in Comics. Poetics Today 41:4 ► pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Candel, Daniel
2020. Extending the embodied semiotic square: A cultural-semantic analysis of “Follow your Arrow”. Semiotica 2020:236-237 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.