This article focuses on an aspect of intensification which has not, so far, received due attention in the extensive literature on the topic: intensifier iteration (very very hot) and co-occurrence (very extremely hot), with a special focus on Old, Middle and Early Modern English as represented in the York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose and the Penn Parsed Corpora of Historical English. The results show that in earlier English, intensifier iteration is less frequent than co-occurrence; that while the former is clearly associated with emphasis, the latter also intersects with grammaticalization and renewal; and that co-occurrence is particularly salient in periods of instability when the competition of intensifiers is at its height. Iteration and co-occurrence of intensifiers are analysed in this article as cases of the widespread cross-linguistic phenomenon of accretion.
= A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers version 3.2 1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013 Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California; modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities are Bamberg, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Lancaster, Leicester, Manchester, Michigan, Northern Arizona, Santiago de Compostela, Southern California, Trier, Uppsala, Zurich. Examples of usage taken from ARCHER were obtained under the terms of the ARCHER User Agreement (available on the Documentation page of the ARCHER website, [URL]).
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geofrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Bolinger, Dwight
1972Degree Words. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
Borst, Eugen
1902Die Gradadverbien im Englischen (Anglistische Forschungen 10). Heidelberg: Winter.
Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse
2016The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20 (2): 221–249.
BT = Bosworth, Joseph & T. Northcote Toller1898An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2006The lady was al demonyak: Historical aspects of adverb all. English Language and Linguistics 10 (2): 345–370.
COCA = Davies, Mark2008The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million Words, 1990-present. Available online at [URL]
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingersoll, Sheila M.
1978Intensive and Restrictive Modification in Old English (Anglistische Forschungen 124). Heidelberg: Winter.
Irvine, Susan
2014The Alfredian prefaces and epilogues. In A Companion to Alfred the Great, Nicole Guenter Discenza & Paul E. Szarmach (eds). Leiden: Brill, 143–170.
Irvine, Susan & Malcom Godden
2012The Old English Boethius with Verse Prologues and Epilogues Associated with King Alfred. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ito, Rika & Sali Tagliamonte
2003Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 321: 257–279.
1997The vocabulary of cognition in early English translations of Boethius from Chaucer to Preston. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 41: 397–414.
Kortmann, Bernd
1997Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kuteva, Tania
2008On the frills of grammaticalization. In Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives, María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–217.
Kytö, Merja & Suzanne Romaine
1997Competing forms of adjective comparison in Modern English: What could be more quicker and easier and more effective? In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Lena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds). Helsinki: Societé Néophiloloque, 329–352.
Kytö, Merja & Suzanne Romaine
2000Adjective comparison and standardisation processes in American and British English from 1620 to the present. In The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, Laura Wright (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171–194.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lass, Roger
1999Phonology and morphology. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. III, 1476–1776, Roger Lass (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–186.
Lehmann, Christian
2005Pleonasm and hypercharacterisation. In Yearbook of Morphology 2005, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds). Dordrecht: Springer, 119–154.
López-Couso, María José
2011Developmental parallels in diachronic and ontogenetic grammaticalization: Existential there as a test case. Folia Linguistica 451: 81–102.
López-Couso, María José
2013Exploring linguistic accretion: Middle English as a testing ground. Plenary lecture delivered at the
8th International Conference on Middle English (ICOME 8)
, University of Murcia, 2–4 May 2013.
López-Couso, María José
2014On structural hypercharacterization: Some examples from the history of English syntax. Plenary lecture delivered at the
18th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 18)
, University of Leuven, 14–18 July 2014.
López-Couso, María José
Forthcoming. Grammar in context: On the role of hypercharacterization in language change. In Grammar – Discourse – Context: Widening the Horizon for a Theory of Grammatical Change, Kristin Bech & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds) Berlin and Boston De Gruyter Mouton
Lorenz, Gunter
1999Adjective Intensification – Learners versus Native Speakers: A Corpus Study of Argumentative Writing. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
2009On the micro-syntax of attributive adjectives. The Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3): 358–375.
Matthews, Peter H.
2014The Positions of Adjectives in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MED = Kurath, Hans & Sherman M. Kuhn1952–2001Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Available online at [URL]
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2003On intensifiers and grammaticalization: The case of swiþe. English Studies 84 (4): 372–391.
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2004Full good, right good, well good? On the competition of intensifiers in the Middle English period. Paper presented at
13 ICEHL
, Vienna, August 2004.
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2006Adjunct, modifier, discourse marker: On the various functions of right in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica 271: 141–169.
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2007He nas nat right fat: On the origin and development of the intensifier right. In Studies in Middle English Forms and Meanings, Gabriella Mazzon (ed.). Bern: Peter Lang, 191–207.
Méndez-Naya, Belén
Forthcoming. On the role of micro- and macro-level contexts in the configuration of the intensifier system in the Ormulum. In Grammar – Discourse – Context: Widening the Horizon for a Theory of Grammatical Change, Kristin Bech & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds) Berlin and Boston De Gruyter Mouton
1985Old English Syntax, Vol. 1 and 21. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mustanoja, Tauno F.
1960A Middle English Syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Nevalainen, Terttu
1997The processes of adverb derivation in late Middle and Early Modern English. In Grammaticalization at Work: Studies of Long-Term Developments in English, Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkonen (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 145–190.
OED Oxford English Dictionary. Available online at [URL]
Palacios, Ignacio & Paloma Núñez-Pertejo
2012He’s absolutely massive. It’s a super day. Madonna, she is a wicked singer. Youth language and intensification: A corpus-based study. Text & Talk 32 (6): 773–796.
Paradis, Carita
1997Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press.
Paradis, Carita
2000It’s well weird. Degree modifiers of adjectives revisited: The nineties. In Corpora Galore: Analysis and Techniques in Describing English, John Kirk (ed.). Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 147–160.
Paradis, Carita
2001Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12 (1): 47–65.
1969Contributions to the study of intensives. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 701: 33–53.
Peltola, Niilo
1971Observations on intensification in Old English poetry. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 721: 649–690.
Peters, Hans
1993Die englischen Gradadverbien der Kategorie booster. Tübingen: Narr.
PPCEME = Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs2004The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME), 1st ed. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, release 3. Available online at [URL]
PPCME2 = Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor2000The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2), 2nd ed. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, release 4. Available online at [URL]
Quirk, Randolph, Sydney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Stoffel, Cornelis
1901Intensives and Downtoners (Anglistische Forschungen 1). Heidelberg: Winter.
Tagliamonte, Sali & Chris Roberts
2005So weird, so cool, so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech 80 (3): 280–300.
YCOE = Taylor, Anthony, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths2003The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. Electronic texts and manuals available from the Oxford Text Archive.
Tagliamonte, Sali
2008So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics 12 (2): 361: 394.
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Davydova, Julia
2023. Tracking global English changes through local data: Intensifiers in German Learner English. International Journal of Bilingualism
2021. Intensifier Usage in Nigerian English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Corpus Pragmatics 5:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2017. Favourite puzzles. English Text Construction 10:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.