Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 8:1 (2015) ► pp.21–64

A corpus-based account of left-detached items in the recent history of English

Left Dislocation vs. Left Detached-sequences

This paper investigates sequences featuring a coreferential link between a left-detached constituent and a resumptive in the following main clause [‘LDet-sequences’]. Their syntactic, semantic and textual behaviour is investigated in historically recent texts (since Modern English) where such detachments are not generally expected to replicate the behaviour that has been attested for contemporary spoken English Left Dislocation [‘LDis’] (cf. Geluykens 1993; Gregory & Michaelis 2001; Snider 2005; Netz et al. 2011). A typology of LDet-sequences is proposed in order to investigate them beyond their apparent structural similarities with spoken English LDis. Left-detached referents are found to typically hold a weak relationship with clause-grammar; however, some of the LDet-sequences attested also exhibit a certain degree of deviation from the less syntactic and freer, discoursal behaviour that characterises others. As far as their diachronic development is concerned, only LDet-sequences that closely resemble LDis illustrate the declining course reported in previous research for LDis (cf. Pérez-Guerra & Tizón-Couto 2009). Lastly, LDet-sequences are more frequent in drama and fiction; thus, the prediction that they are employed to recreate conversation (cf. Geluykens 1992) is provisionally borne out.

Keywords: Left Dislocation, information structure, detachments, history of English
Published online: 10 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.8.1.02tiz
References
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos
1996 The Puzzle of Apposition: On So-called Appositive Structures in English. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Servicio de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico).Google Scholar
Acuña Fariña, Juan Carlos
1999 On apposition. English Language and Linguistics 3 (1): 59–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts
(eds.) 1997 Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ARCHER 3.1 = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers version 3.1
1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013 Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California; modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities are Bamberg, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Lancaster, Leicester, Manchester, Michigan, Northern Arizona, Santiago de Compostela, Southern California, Trier, Uppsala, Zurich. Examples of usage taken from ARCHER were obtained under the terms of the ARCHER User Agreement (available on the Documentation page of the ARCHER website, [URL], last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Barcelona Sánchez, Antonio
1988 El tópico desgajado en inglés: Motivación pragmática. Atlantis 10 (1–2): 9–20.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty
2004 Discourse functions at the periphery: Noncanonical word order in English. ZASPIL 35 (1): 41–62.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty & Gregory Ward
2002 Information packaging. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1363–1447.Google Scholar
Brown, Cheryl
1983 Topic continuity in written English narrative. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study, Talmy Givón (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 313–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1975 Nominal apposition. Foundations of Language 13 (3): 391–419.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1977 On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.). New York: Academic Press, 71–132.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö
2010 Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Vries, Mark
2007 Dislocation and backgrounding. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Bettelou Los & Marjo van Koppen (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 235–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon
1997 The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part II: Complex and Derived Constructions. Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Angela & Philip Locke
2006 English Grammar: A University Course. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox & Sandra Thompson
2003 Social interaction and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 21, Michael Tomasello (ed.). London: Lawrence, 119–143.Google Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald
1992 From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left Dislocation in English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Syntactic, semantic and interactional prototypes: The case of left-dislocation. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, Richard Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 709–730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979 On Understanding Grammar. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1983 Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez-González, María Ángeles
2001 The Theme-topic Interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González Álvarez, Dolores
2002 Disjunct Adverbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study. Vigo: University of Vigo.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michelle
& Laura Michaelis 2001 Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (11): 1665–1706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes
2000 Copy left dislocation. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Roger Billerey & Brook Danielle Lillehaugen (eds.). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 139–152.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette
1977 The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013 Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Stefan Gries
2009 Assessing frequency changes in multi-stage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24 (4): 385–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirschbühler, Paul
1997 The source of lefthand NPs in French. In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 55–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1937 Analytic Syntax. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Keenan-Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin
1976 Foregrounding referents: A reconsideration of left dislocation in discourse. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 240–257.
Keizer, Evelien
2005 The discourse function of close appositions. Neophilologus 89 (3): 447–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kies, Daniel
1988 Marked themes with and without pronominal reinforcement: Their meaning and distribution in discourse. In Pragmatics, Discourse and Text: Some Systemically-inspired Approaches, Erich Steiner & Robert Veltman (eds.). London: Pinter, 47–72.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Lauren Delfs
2004 The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition, [URL] (Last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Kroch, Aanthony & Ariel Diertani
2010 The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Modern British English (PPCMBE). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition, [URL] (Last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor
2000 The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, second edition, [URL] (Last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 On the formal and functional relationship between topics and vocatives: Evidence from French. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Adele Goldberg (ed.). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 267–288.Google Scholar
Larsson, Eva
1979 La Dislocation en français: Étude de syntaxe generative (Études Romanes de Lund). Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Lennard, John
1995 Punctuation: and – Pragmatics. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas Jucker (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 65–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Erwin Komen
2012 Clefts as resolution strategies after the loss of a multifunctional first position. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 884–898.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles
1992 Apposition in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Philip
2001 Discourse constraints on (non)extraposition from subject in English. Linguistics 39 (4): 683–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Michael
1982 The functions of left dislocation in spontaneous discourse. In The Ninth Lacus Forum, John Morreal (ed.). Columbia: Hornbeam, 425–432.Google Scholar
Netz, Hadar, Ron Kuzar & Zohar Eviatar
2011 A recipient-based study of the discourse functions of marked topic constructions. Language Sciences 33 (1): 154–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick
2004 On split-CPs, uninterpretable features, and the ‘perfectness’ of language. ZASPIL 35 (2): 399–422.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra Thompson
1994 Unattached NPs in English conversation. BLS 20 (1994): 402–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, parsed version
2006 Annotated by Ann Taylor, Arja Nurmi, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Terttu Nevalainen. Compiled by the CEEC Project Team. York: University of York and Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive.
Pérez-Guerra, Javier
1999 Historical English Syntax: A Statistical Corpus Based Study on the Organisation of Early Modern English Sentences. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2005 Word order after the loss of the verb-second constraint or the importance of early Modern English in the fixation of syntactic and informative (un-)markedness. English Studies 86 (4): 342–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier & David Tizón-Couto
2009 On left dislocation in the recent history of English: Theory and data hand in hand. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds.). London: Routledge, 31–48.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1997 On the functions of left-dislocation in English discourse. In Directions in Functional Linguistics, Akio Kamio (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 117–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 On the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and topicalization. In The Limits of Syntax, Peter Culicover & Louise McNally (eds.). San Diego: Academic Press, 281–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981 Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27 (1): 53–94.Google Scholar
Rodman, Robert
1974 On left dislocation. Papers in Linguistics 71: 437–66. [1997. Reprinted In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 31–54] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John
1967 Constraints on Variables in Syntax. MIT: Doctoral Dissertation. [1986. Published as Infinite Syntax! Norton, NJ: Ablex].Google Scholar
1973 A fake NP squish. In New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Charles-James Bailey & Roger Shuy (eds.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 96–140.Google Scholar
Snider, Neal
2005 A corpus study of left dislocation and topicalization. Stanford University: Linguistics Department, TS. [URL] (Last accessed on 29 April 2011).
Tizón-Couto, David
2012 Left Dislocation in English: A Functional-discoursal Approach (Linguistic Insights 143). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. A corpus-based account of the decline of left-dislocated noun phrases in the recent history of English. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics , Leuven.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1972 The History of English Syntax: A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
2007 Old English left-dislocations: Their structure and information status. Folia Linguistica 41 (3–4): 405–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, Henk
1997 Left dislocation. In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vat, Jan
1997 Left dislocation, connectedness and reconstruction. In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 67–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalba, Xavier
2000 The syntax of sentence periphery. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Wald, Benji
1983 Referents and topics within and across discourse units: Observations from current vernacular English. In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, Flora Klein-Andreu (ed.). London and New York: Academic Press, 91–106.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Tizón-Couto, David
2016. Left-dislocated strings in Modern English epistolary prose. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Tizón-Couto, David
2017. Exploring the Left Dislocation construction by means of multiple linear regression. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Tizón-Couto, David
2018. Chapter 8. Complexity and genre distribution of left-dislocated strings after the fixation of SVO syntax. In Explorations in English Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 198], ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.