Article published in:
English World-Wide
Vol. 36:2 (2015) ► pp. 198227
References
The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (DECTE)
Allen, Will, Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, Warren Maguire, and Hermann L. Moisl
2007 “The Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English ”. In Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, and Herman L. Moisl, eds. Creating and Digitising Language Corpora. Vol. 2: Diachronic Databases. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 16–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan C
1993 “The Grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English”. In James Milroy and Lesley Milroy, eds. Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman, 187–213.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C., and Karen P. Corrigan
2005 “ No, Nay, Never: Negation in Tyneside English”. In Yoko Iyeiri, ed. Aspects of English Negation. Tokyo: Yushodo University Press, and Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 139–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, Ylva
1997 “Future in Present-Day English: Corpus-Based Evidence on the Rivalry of Expressions”. ICAME Journal 211: 7–19.Google Scholar
2000 “Utilising Present-Day English Corpora: A Case Study Concerning Expressions of Future Time”. ICAME Journal 241: 25–63.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca
1991 “Back to the Future”. In Elizabeth C. Traugott, and Bernd Heine, eds. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Karen P., Isabelle Buchstaller, Adam J. Mearns, and Hermann L. Moisl
2012The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English. http://​research​.ncl​.ac​.uk​/decte/ (accessed July 30, 2013).
Corrigan, Karen P., Adam Mearns, and Hermann L. Moisl
2014 “Feature-Based Versus Aggregate Analyses of the DECTE Corpus: Phonological and Morphological Variability in Tyneside English”. In Benedikt Szmrecsanyi and Bernhard Wälchli, eds. Aggregating Dialectology, Typology and Feature Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 113–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danchev, Andrei, and Merja Kytö
1994 “The Construction Be Going to + Infinitive in Early Modern English”. In Dieter Kastovsky, ed. Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 59–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
1998 “Syntax”. In Suzanne Romaine, ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 41: 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92–329.Google Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan
2008New-Dialect Formation in Canada: Evidence from the English Modal Auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
1992 “Syntax”. In Norman Blake, ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 21: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 207–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio
2003 “ Shall and Will in Contemporary English: A Comparison with Past Uses”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank Palmer, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 267–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John
1993 “The Grammar of Irish English”. In James Milroy, and Lesley Milroy, eds. Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman, 139–186.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1991 “On Some Principles of Grammaticization”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott, ed. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott
1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dan E
2009 “Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed Effects Variable Rule Analysis”. Language and Linguistics Compass 31: 359–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krug, Manfred
2000Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2003 “Modality on the Move: The English Modal Auxiliaries 1961–1992”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank Palmer, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 223–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
1997 “The Spread of the Going to Future in Written English: A Corpus-Based Investigation into Language Change in Progress”. In Raymond Hickey, and Stanislaw Puppel, eds. Language History and Linguistic Modelling. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1537–1543.Google Scholar
2006Twentieth-Century English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian, and Geoffrey Leech
2006 “Current Changes in English Syntax”. In Bas Aarts, and April McMahon, eds. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 318–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Christine
1981 “Variation in the Use of the Modal Verbs with Special Reference to Tyneside English”. Ph.D. dissertation, Newcastle University.
Miller, Jim
1993 “The Grammar of Scottish English”. In James Milroy, and Lesley Milroy, eds. Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman, 99–138.Google Scholar
Myhill, John
1995 “Change and Continuity in the Functions of the American English Modals”. Linguistics 331: 175–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja
2010 “The Development of Future Time Expressions in Late Modern English: Redistribution of Forms or Change in Discourse?English Language and Linguistics 141: 163–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Mechanisms of Language Change in a Functional System: The Recent Semantic Evolution of English Future Time Expressions”. Journal of Historical Linguistics 21: 83–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “From Contraction to Construction? The Recent Life of ’ll ”. In Marianne Hundt, ed. Late Modern English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicolle, Steve
1997 “A Relevance-Theoretic Account of Be Going to ”. Journal of Linguistics 331: 355–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana, and Sali Tagliamonte
2000 “The Grammaticalization of Going to in (African American) English”. Language Variation and Change 111: 315–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Royster, Jane F., and John M. Steadman
1923 [1968] “The Going-to Future”. In Manly Anniversary Studies in Languages and Literature. Freeport: Books for Libraries Press, 394–403.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David
1988 “Problems of Representativeness”. In Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, and Klaus J. Mattheier, eds. An International Handbook of Language and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 899–903.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Sali A. Tagliamonte, and Jennifer Smith
2005 “GoldVarb X”. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. http://​individual​.utoronto​.ca​/tagliamonte​/GoldVarb​/GV​_index​.htm.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2003 “Be Going to Versus Will/Shall. Does Syntax Matter?Journal of English Linguistics 311: 295–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali
2012Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
2013Roots of English. Exploring the History of Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torres-Cacoullos, Rena, and James A. Walker
2009 “The Present of the English Future: Grammatical Variation and Collocations in Discourse”. Language 851: 321–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2003 “Modal Verbs in Tyneside English: Evidence for (Socio)Linguistic Theory”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank Palmer, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 373–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony
1993English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Hundt, Marianne & Adina Staicov
2018. Identity in the London Indian diaspora: Towards the quantification of qualitative data. World Englishes 37:2  pp. 166 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.