Cover not available
Article published In:
Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theoretical developments and directions
Edited by Wendy L. Bowcher and Tom Bartlett
[Functions of Language 28:3] 2021
► pp. 315–341

Context of situation and the role of language

ORCID logo | Sun Yat-sen University
‘Role’ is typically defined according to the part and/or function that something or someone contributes to a situation. This two-fold perspective is also inherent in discussions of the role of language: the ‘amount’ of language that is involved in a situation and the ‘function’ of language in a situation, with both perspectives relating to the non-linguistic systems that may be involved in the conduct of the situation relative to language. It is the latter of these perspectives, however, that has typically received most attention in discourse analysis, with the former (the ‘amount’) being left implicit and unproblematised. This paper considers the role of language from various discourse analytical perspectives before critically examining the concept within Systemic Functional Linguistics. Using system networks as the representational and analytical platform, the paper redefines ‘role of language’ in contextual Mode as comprised of two sub-systems: degree of involvement and type of involvement. degree of involvement accounts for the compositional contribution that language makes in a situation; type of involvement accounts for the way in which language may function in a situation. Using an illustrative dataset, the paper also demonstrates the effectiveness of the systemic approach in accounting for overlapping and differing contextual configurations by showing how features within the role of language configure and how these in turn configure with options in the Field system-network of action. These configurations are essentially hypotheses that can be more comprehensively tested through empirical research.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Context and the role of language
  • 3.‘Role of language’ in SFL theory
  • 4.Role of language and mode
  • 5.Refining the options in the role of language
    • 5.1Degree of language involvement
    • 5.2Type of language involvement
  • 6.Contextual configurations
    • 6.1Configuration of choices in the role of language
    • 6.2Configuration of choices in role of language with choices in action (Field)
  • 7.Concluding comments
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20014.bow
References
Bartlett, Tom
2013 I’ll manage the context: Context, environment, and the potential for institutional change. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 342–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016a Multiscalar modelling of context: Some questions raised by the category of mode. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), 166–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b Phasal dynamism and the unfolding of meaning as text. English Text Construction 9(1). 143–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, Margaret
2016 On describing contexts of situation. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), 184–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L.
1999 Investigating institutionalisation in context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 141–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Play-by-play talk on radio: An enquiry into some relations between language and context. Liverpool: University of Liverpool PhD thesis.Google Scholar
2004 Theme and New in play-by-play radio sports commentating. In David Banks (ed.), Text and texture, 455–493. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
2007 Field and multimodal texts. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian Matthiessen & Jonathan Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language, 619–646. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2013 Material action as choice in field. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 318–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Issues in developing unified systems for contextual field and mode. Functions of language 21(2). 176–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguistics 5(5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L. & Jennifer Y. Liang
(eds.) 2016 Society in language, language in society: Essays in honor of Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, David G.
2001 Firth, Halliday and the development of systemic functional theory. In Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh (eds.), History of the language sciences: An international handbook on the evolution of the study of language from the beginning to the present, 1806–1838. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
2004 Parameters of context: On establishing the similarities and differences between social processes. Sydney: Macquarie University unpublished mimeo.Google Scholar
2010 The meaning of a network: Applying the linguistics of Hasan, Halliday, and Lamb. Presentation at Connecting Paths: Lamb, Halliday, and Hasan . Guangzhou, China, Sun Yat-sen University, 3rd November.
Cloran, Carmel
1999 Context, material situation, and text. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 177–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruse, Alan
2011 Meaning in Language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. van
2008 Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady
(eds.) 2013 Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Charles
2014 Relevance theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. In David Machin (ed.), Visual Communication, 51–70. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franks, Rachel
2016 A true crime tale: Re-imagining Governor Arthur’s proclamation to the Aborigines. M/C Journal 18(6). Available online at: [URL]. Accessed 29 Sept. 2020. DOI logo
Ghadessy, Mohsen
(ed.) 1999 Text and context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2017 Co-operative action. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1985 Part A. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 3–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 The place of dialogue in children’s construction of meaning. In Donna Alvermann, Norman J. Unrau & Robert B. Ruddell (eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, 6th edn., 152–163. Newark: International Reading Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., Angus Macintosh & Peter Strevens
1964 The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1985 Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1985 Part B. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 51–121.Google Scholar
1999 Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 219–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The place of context in a systemic functional model. In M. A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), The continuum companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics, 166–189. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2014 Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions and semantics. Functional linguistics 1(9). 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2004 Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In David Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 222–245. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Knapp, Mark, Judith Hall & Terrance G. Horgan
2014 Nonverbal communication in human interaction, 8th edn. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther
2009 What is Mode? In Carey Jewitt (ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, 54–67. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014 Design: The rhetorical work of shaping the semiotic world. In Arlene Archer & Denise Newfield (eds.), Multimodal approaches to research and pedagogy, 131–152. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen
2006 Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, Konraad & Robyn Lewis
2013 The effect of the broadcast medium on the language of radio and television sports commentary genres: The Rugby Union Lineout. Journal of Sports Media 8(2). 31–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
1992 [1979] Activity types and language. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work, 66–100. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R.
1992 English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinec, Radan & Andrew Salway
2005 A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication 4(3). 337–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2019 Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 1451. 47–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay
2015 Multimodal digital humanities. In Peter P. Trifonis (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 389–415. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Royce, Terry D.
2007 Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In Terry D. Royce & Wendy L. Bowcher (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 63–109. Newark, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1985 Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald
2006 An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wegener, Rebekah
2019 What makes a text a text? Functions of Language 26(1). 28–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar