References

References

Bartlett, Tom
2013I’ll manage the context: Context, environment, and the potential for institutional change. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 342–364.Google Scholar
2016aMultiscalar modelling of context: Some questions raised by the category of mode. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), 166–183.Google Scholar
2016bPhasal dynamism and the unfolding of meaning as text. English Text Construction 9(1). 143–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Margaret
2016On describing contexts of situation. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), 184–205.Google Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L.
1999Investigating institutionalisation in context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 141–176.Google Scholar
2001Play-by-play talk on radio: An enquiry into some relations between language and context. Liverpool: University of Liverpool PhD thesis.Google Scholar
2004Theme and New in play-by-play radio sports commentating. In David Banks (ed.), Text and texture, 455–493. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
2007Field and multimodal texts. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian Matthiessen & Jonathan Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language, 619–646. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2013Material action as choice in field. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 318–341.Google Scholar
2014Issues in developing unified systems for contextual field and mode. Functions of language 21(2). 176–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguistics 5(5). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L. & Jennifer Y. Liang
(eds.) 2016Society in language, language in society: Essays in honor of Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, David G.
2001Firth, Halliday and the development of systemic functional theory. In Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh (eds.), History of the language sciences: An international handbook on the evolution of the study of language from the beginning to the present, 1806–1838. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
2004Parameters of context: On establishing the similarities and differences between social processes. Sydney: Macquarie University unpublished mimeo.Google Scholar
2010The meaning of a network: Applying the linguistics of Hasan, Halliday, and Lamb. Presentation at Connecting Paths: Lamb, Halliday, and Hasan . Guangzhou, China, Sun Yat-sen University, 3rd November.
Cloran, Carmel
1999Context, material situation, and text. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 177–218.Google Scholar
Cruse, Alan
2011Meaning in Language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. van
2008Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989Language and power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady
(eds.) 2013Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Charles
2014Relevance theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. In David Machin (ed.), Visual Communication, 51–70. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franks, Rachel
2016A true crime tale: Re-imagining Governor Arthur’s proclamation to the Aborigines. M/C Journal 18(6). Available online at: journal​.media​-culture​.org​.au​/index​.php​/mcjournal​/article​/view​/1036. Accessed 29 Sept. 2020. Crossref
Ghadessy, Mohsen
(ed.) 1999Text and context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2017Co-operative action. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1985Part A. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 3–49.Google Scholar
2013The place of dialogue in children’s construction of meaning. In Donna Alvermann, Norman J. Unrau & Robert B. Ruddell (eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, 6th edn., 152–163. Newark: International Reading Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., Angus Macintosh & Peter Strevens
1964The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1985Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1985Part B. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 51–121.Google Scholar
1999Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 219–232.Google Scholar
2009The place of context in a systemic functional model. In M. A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), The continuum companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics, 166–189. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2014Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions and semantics. Functional linguistics 1(9). 1–54.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2004Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In David Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 222–245. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Knapp, Mark, Judith Hall & Terrance G. Horgan
2014Nonverbal communication in human interaction, 8th edn. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther
2009What is Mode? In Carey Jewitt (ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, 54–67. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014Design: The rhetorical work of shaping the semiotic world. In Arlene Archer & Denise Newfield (eds.), Multimodal approaches to research and pedagogy, 131–152. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen
2006Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, Konraad & Robyn Lewis
2013The effect of the broadcast medium on the language of radio and television sports commentary genres: The Rugby Union Lineout. Journal of Sports Media 8(2). 31–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
1992 [1979]Activity types and language. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work, 66–100. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R.
1992English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinec, Radan & Andrew Salway
2005A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication 4(3). 337–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2019Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 145. 47–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay
2015Multimodal digital humanities. In Peter P. Trifonis (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 389–415. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Royce, Terry D.
2007Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In Terry D. Royce & Wendy L. Bowcher (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 63–109. Newark, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1985Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald
2006An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wegener, Rebekah
2019What makes a text a text? Functions of Language 26(1). 28–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar