Article in:
Functions of Language: Online-First Articles

Modelling interfaces with context in SFL

Stratification, instantiation, metafunctions

| Ghent University
This is a study of the tools for describing language-in-context in Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), and specifically, the way in which dynamic time can be added to this description. Of central importance in this exploration are the concepts of stratification and instantiation and their interaction, and the way in which this interaction is ‘achieved’ metafunctionally and dynamically through the construction of relevant contexts spanning various time scales. The article proposes a new theorization of context in SFL, in which context is regarded as an interplay of different interfacing semiotic strata, and a meshing of multiple complementary and interacting processes of mediation which are at work at different scales of semogenesis.
Published online: 07 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20015.tav
References

References

Angermuller, Johannes
2014 Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis: Subjectivity in enunciative pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Tom
2017 Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Towards scalar supervenience. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 375–390. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 Rethinking (context of) culture in Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Akila Sellami-Baklouti & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
In press. No gods and precious few heroes: Towards a materialist account of linguistic dynamics. Lingua.
Bednarek, Monika & J. R. Martin
(eds.) 2010 New Discourse on Language. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1974 Problèmes de linguistique générale. Volume 2. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil
1971 Class, codes and control. Volume 1: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2007 Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 4(1). 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Chronotopes, scales and complexity in the study of language and society. Annual Review of Anthropology 44. 105–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1988 Sprachkompetenz. Grundzüge der Theorie des Sprechens. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine
1999 Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Tome 3: Domaine notionnel. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2016 How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 28(1). 83–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2014 Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, John Rupert
1957/1935 The technique of semantics. In John Rupert Firth, Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951, 7–33. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady
(eds.) 2013 Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1969 L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard. (Transl. The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language. London: Routledge 1989.)Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Malaika Santa Cruz
2012 Temporal unfolding of conceptual metaphoric experience. Metaphor & Symbol 27(4). 299–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1975 Learning How to Mean. London: Arnold. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985a Systemic background. In James D. Benson & William S. Greaves (eds.), Systemic Perspectives on Discourse. Vol. 1, 1–15. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1985b Part A. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective, 1–49. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
1990 New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In Martin Pütz (ed.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution, 59–95. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 Towards probabilistic interpretations. In Eija Ventola (ed.), Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and uses, 39–61. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
1999 The notion of ‘context’ in language education. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 1–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Opening address: Working with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. In Jonathan Webster (ed.), Meaning in context, 7–23. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013 Meaning as choice. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 15–36.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
1999 Construing experience through meaning. London: Cassell/Continuum.Google Scholar
2004 An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1984 Ways of saying: Ways of meaning. In Robin Fawcett, M. A. K. Halliday, Sydney Lamb & Adam Makkai (eds.), The semiotics of culture and language. Vol. 1., 105–162. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1995 The concept of context in text. In Peter H. Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic-functional perspectives, 183–283. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
2013 Choice, system, realisation: Describing language as meaning potential. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 269–299.Google Scholar
2014 Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions, and semantics. Functional Linguistics 1(9). 1–54.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1954 La stratification du langage. Word 10. 163–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1963 [1943] Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Translation by Francis J. Whitfield from the Danish original: Omkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse, Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sydney M.
1962 Outline of stratificational grammar. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L.
1984 Semiotics and education. Toronto: Victoria University.Google Scholar
1995 Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle
2018 War and its Ideologies. Singapore: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2014 The contextual component in a dynamic FDG. Pragmatics 24(2). 249–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian
2015 Introduction: Language emergence. In Brian MacWhinney & William O’Grady (eds.), The handbook of language emergence, 1–31. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
1992 English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Semantic variation: Modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis. In Monika Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.), 1–34.Google Scholar
2019 Once more with feeling: Negotiating evaluation. Language, Context and Text 1(2). 234–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
1991 Systemic typology and topology. In Frances Christie (ed.), Literacy in social processes, 345–383. Northern Territory University, Darwin: Centre for Studies in Language and Education.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Erika Matruglio
2020 Revisiting mode: Context in/dependency in Ancient History classroom discourse. In J. R. Martin, Karl Maton & Y. J. Doran (eds.), Accessing academic discourse, 89–113. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
1992 Interpreting the textual metafunction. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics, 37–81. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
2019 Register in Systemic Functional Linguistics. Register Studies 1(1). 10–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2019 The author and the text in radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Functions of Language 26(1). 56–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael
1999 Context in dynamic modellling. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 63–99.Google Scholar
Slembrouck, Stef & Mieke Vandenbroucke
2020 Scale. In Karin Tusting (ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic ethnography, 70–83. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2006 Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam
2002 Metaphor. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics 2002. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Hjelmslev’s semiotic model of language: An exegesis. Semiotica 171. 367–394.Google Scholar
2011 The syntax–semantics interface in Systemic Functional Grammar: Halliday’s interpretation of the Hjelmslevian model of stratification. Journal of Pragmatics 43(4). 1100–1126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 Semantics. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), Cambridge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 55–91. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Paul J.
2004a Brain, mind and the signifying body. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2004b Agency and consciousness in discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2011 First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology 23(3). 210–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Sumin
2010 Intersemiotic relations as logogenetic patterns: Towards the restoration of the time dimension in hypertext description. In Monika Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.), 195–218.Google Scholar