Article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 22:2 (2015) ► pp. 232263
References
Aarts, Bas
2007Syntactic gradience. The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2007Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 311. 569–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 881. 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte
2007The grammaticalization of small size nouns: Reconsidering frequency and analogy. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4). 293–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J
1988The development of English aspectual systems: Aspectualizers and post-verbal particles. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1995The aktionsart of deverbal nouns in English. In Pier Marco Bertinetto (ed.), Temporal reference, aspect and actionality. Vol. 11, 27–42. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Minoji Akimoto
1999Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia
2000Multi-word verbs in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2000Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In Petra Maria Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes, 65–102. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Simon De Wolf
2012Lexicalization and grammaticalization: The development of idioms and grammaticalized expressions with no question . Text & Talk 32(5). 569–591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Deyne, Simon, Yves Peirsman & Gert Storms
2009Sources of semantic similarity. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1834–1839. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2009Analysing reanalysis. Lingua 119(11). 1728–1755. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1991A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat, Susan Reed & Bert Cappelle
2006The grammar of the English verb phrase. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010On some problem areas in grammaticalization theory. In Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues, 17–50. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova
2012‘Paradigmatic integration’: The fourth stage in an expanded grammaticalization scenario. In Kristin Davidse, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: Origins, criteria and outcomes, 109–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C
1989The theory of Functional Grammar: 1. The structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R
1979Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins
2000In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 761. 546–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, John Rupert
1951/1957Models of meaning. Papers in linguistics 1934-1951 (1957). London: OUP.Google Scholar
Fried, Miriam
2010Grammaticalization and lexicalization effects in participial morphology: A Construction Grammar approach to language change. In An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research, 191–223. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garachana, Mar, Sandra Montserrat & Claus Pusch
(eds.) 2013From composite predicates to verbal periphrases in Romance languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adèle
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1961Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3). 241–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1966Lexis as a linguistic level. In Charles E. Bazell, J.C. Catford, M.A.K. Halliday, & R. Robins (eds.), In memory of J.R. Firth, 148–162. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1992How do you mean? In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics. Recent theory and practice, 20–35. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1994An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1994On the genesis of aspect in African languages: The proximative. In Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special session on historical issues in African linguistics , 35–36. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Hengeveld, Kees
1989Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 251. 127–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian
2004Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? In Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 171–210. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Volume I: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 17–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971 [1939]Signe zéro. In Selected writings. Volume 2: Word and language , 211–219. The Hague: Mouton.
Jespersen, Otto
1914-29/1956A modern English grammar on historical principles. 7 Vols1. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jones, Susan & John M. Sinclair
1973English lexical collocations. Cahiers de Lexicologie XXIII1, 15–61.Google Scholar
König, Crista
1993Aspekt im Maa. (Afrikanistische Monographien 3). Köln: Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Laffut, An & Kristin Davidse
2002English locative constructions: An exercise in neo-Firthian description and dialogue with other schools. Functions of Language 9(2). 169–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical prequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1999Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2002 [1982]Thoughts on grammaticalization. München: LINCOM Europe. [First published as Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch. University of Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.]Google Scholar
2002New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maslov, Yuriy S
1985An outline of contrastive qspectology. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
McGregor, William
1997Semiotic grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura
2004Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15(1). 1–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moens, Marc & Marc Steedman
1988Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2). 15–28.Google Scholar
Navalpatro-Gómez, Ana
2000The expression of imminence in English, Spanish and Galician: Some questions. Düsseldorf Working Papers in Linguistics II1. 33–48.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2007Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2). 177–202. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter, Kristin Davidse & Tinne Van Rompaey
2012On ways of being on the way: Lexical, complex preposition and aspectual marker uses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(2). 229–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ronan, Patricia
2014Light verb constructions in the history of English. In Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.), Corpus interrogation and grammatical patterns, 17–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1949Selected writings in language, culture and personality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M
1991Corpus, concordance and collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S
1991The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
2003Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2012Grammaticalization, constructions and the grammaticalization of constructions. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change. New reflections, 165–196. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Rompaey, Tinne
2014A comparison of progressive be V-ing with be in the middle, midst, process or act of V-ing: The interaction of lexical and grammatical progressive aspect. Transactions of the Philological Society 112(2). 188–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Rompaey, Tinne & Kristin Davidse
2014The different developments of progressive aspect markers be in the middle/midst of and be in the process of V-ing: Mechanisms of change. In Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Theory and data, 181–202. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk
2005Aspectual composition: Surveying the ingredients. In Henk Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics: Perspectives on aspect, 19–39. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Fontaine, Lise
2017. On prepositions and particles: a case for lexical representation in systemic functional linguistics. <i>WORD</i> 63:2  pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo
Hilpert, Martin
2018.  In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Leddy-Cecere, Thomas
2022. Indexicality, semanticity and contact along the now < this time pathway. Journal of Historical Linguistics 12:1  pp. 70 ff. Crossref logo
Mulder, Walter De
2019.  En voie de . Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 54:1  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.