Article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 22:3 (2015) ► pp. 332361
Ädel, Annelie & Anna Mauranen
2010Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2). 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1997 I think — an English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf J. Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives, 1–48. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen, O. Wesley, Jr
2010Introduction: The pillars of the new homiletic. In O. Wesley Allen Jr. (ed.), The renewed homiletic, 1–23. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Ronald J
1992Preaching the topical sermon. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
2004Preaching as mutual critical correlation through conversation. In Jana Childers (ed.), Purposes of preaching, 1–22. Atlanta, GA: Chalice.Google Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence
2014AntConc (3.2.4m) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. http://​www​.antlab​.sci​.waseda​.ac​.jp/ (10 March 2014)Google Scholar
Ashworth, Jacinta & Ian Farthing
2007Churchgoing in the UK: A research report from Tearfund on church attendance in the UK. Tearfund. http://​news​.bbc​.co​.uk​/2​/shared​/bsp​/hi​/pdfs​/03​_04​_07​_tearfundchurch​.pdf (16 March 2014)Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan
1989Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9(1). 93–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johnsson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Broadus, John A. & Jesse B. Weatherspoon
1944On the preparation and delivery of sermons. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
1978Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. 56–310. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Buttrick, David
1987Homiletic: Moves and structures. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
1999On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31(7). 881–909. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1986Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Joanna Nichols & Wallace Chafe (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 261–273. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna
1994Vague language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Craddock, Fred. B
2001As one without authority. Atlanta, GA: Chalice.Google Scholar
2010Preaching. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.Google Scholar
Crompton, Peter
1997Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes 16(4). 271–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutting, Joan
2007Vague language explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drever, Eric
2003Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research: A teacher’s guide. Glasgow: The SCRE Centre.Google Scholar
Eslinger, Richard
2002The web of preaching: New options in homiletic method. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.Google Scholar
Flottum, Kjersti & Trine Dahl
2012Different contexts, different “stories”? A linguistic comparison of two development reports on climate change. Language & Communication 32(1). 14–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1975Hedged performatives. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, 187–210. New York, NY: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Pragmatic competence: the case of hedging. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 15–34. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Lucy
1999Rethinking persuasion: Developing an incarnational theology of preaching. Homiletic 24(2). 1–12.Google Scholar
Hubler, Axel
1983Understatements and hedges in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1996Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17(4). 433–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse
2004Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25(2). 156–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Immink, F. Gerrit
2004Homiletics: The current debate. International Journal of Practical Theology 8(1). 89–121 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider
2010Introduction. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 1–14. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1972Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Papers from the eighth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 1972 . 188–228.
Lewin, Beverly A
2005Hedging: An exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of ‘toning down’ in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4(2). 163–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lose, David J
2003Confessing Jesus Christ: Preaching in a postmodern world. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Malmström, Hans
In Press. The ‘other’ voice in preaching: intertextual form and function in contemporary English sermonic discourse. Journal of Communication and Religion.
Maring, Norman & Winthrop Hudson
2012A Baptist manual of polity and practice. Valley Forge, PA: Judson.Google Scholar
Markkanen, Raija & Hartmut Schröder
1997Introduction. In Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts, 3–20. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R
2000Close reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. In Len Unsworth (ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives, 257–302. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
McClure, John S
2003The four codes of preaching: Rhetorical strategies. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
2007Preaching words: 144 key terms in homiletics. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R
1990Mood and modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F., Joel Frader & Charles Bosk
1982On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In Robert J. Di Pietro (ed.), Linguistics and the professions, 83–97. Norwood.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph & Christoph Schönborn
1994Introduction to the catechism of the Catholic Church. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius.Google Scholar
Rose, Lucy
1997Sharing the word: Preaching in the roundtable church. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
1994Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13(2). 140–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seters, Arthur van
1991The problematic of preaching in the third millennium. Interpretation 45(3). 267–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
2000The functions of I think in political discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1). 41–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornbury, Scott & Diana Slade
2006Conversation: From description to pedagogy. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Vande Kopple, William J
2002Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric. In Ellen L. Barton & Gail Stygall (eds.), Discourse studies in composition, 91–113. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
Waznak, Robert
1998An introduction to the homily. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Paul S
1995The practice of preaching. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.Google Scholar
2004Preaching and homiletical theory. Atlanta, GA: Chalice.Google Scholar
White, Peter R.R. & Motoki Sano
2006Dialogistic positions and anticipated audiences. A framework for stylistic comparisons. In Karin Aijmer & Anne-Marie Simon Vandenbergen (eds.), Pragmatic markers in contrast, 189–214. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert
1992Rediscovering the sacred: Perspectives on religion in contemporary society. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
2012The God problem: Expressing faith and being reasonable. Berkeley, CA: University of California. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Preaching in uncertain terms