Chapter published in:
Producing Figurative Expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectivesEdited by John Barnden and Andrew Gargett
[Figurative Thought and Language 10] 2020
► pp. 211–236
How defaultness shapes our language production
A usage-based study of discoursal resonance with default interpretations of metaphor and sarcasm
Rachel Giora | Tel Aviv University
The paper focuses on discourse production.
It shows that language production unfolds via resonating (Du Bois, 2014) with default
interpretations. Default interpretations are defined as automatic
responses. However, for an automatic response to be considered a
default, it has to be (i) novel; (ii) free of semantic an omaly
(Beardsley, 1958) and
internal incongruity (Partington, 2011); and (iii) free of contextual
information, intonation, discourse markers, etc. Results show that
constructions, shown to be interpreted sarcastically or
metaphorically when in isolation, were processed faster than
nondefault counterparts when in discourse. As a result, corpus-based
studies, displaying default interpretations, show that speakers’
discourse is unfolding via utterances’ default rather than
nondefault interpretations. This applies here to Hebrew but also to
English, German, and Russian.
Keywords: discourse production, default interpretations, nondefault interpretations, processing, sarcasm, metaphor, literalness, negative, affirmative, corpus-based studies
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Conditions for interpretations’ defaultness: Which kind of responses would be definable as default outputs
- 1.2The defaultness hypothesis – predictions
- 2.On the speed superiority of default over nondefault
interpretations
- 2.1The speed superiority of default metaphorical interpretations of negative constructions over their nondefault literal counterparts
- 2.2The speed superiority of default sarcastic interpretations of negative constructions over their nondefault literal counterparts
- 2.3The speed superiority of default literal interpretations of affirmative sarcasm over their nondefault literal counterparts
- 2.4The speed superiority of default literal interpretations of affirmative metaphors over their nondefault literal counterparts
- 2.5The speed superiority of default over nondefault counterparts is insensitive to degree of figurativeness
- 3.Resonating with default interpretations
- 3.1Resonating with default metaphorical interpretations of
negative constructions
- 3.1.1Study 1: Distribution of default negative metaphoricity and default affirmative literalness
- 3.1.2Study 2: Distribution of type of resonance with default metaphorical interpretations of negative constructions
- 3.2Resonating with default sarcastic interpretations of negative
constructions
- 3.2.1Study 3: Distribution of default negative sarcasm and default affirmative literalness of the form X s/he is not
- 3.2.2Study 4: Distribution of type of resonance with default sarcastic interpretations of negative constructions of the form X s/he is not
- 3.2.3Study 5: Distribution of default negative sarcasm and default affirmative literalness of the form X is not her/his forte/best attribute
- 3.2.4Study 6: Distribution of type of resonance with default sarcastic interpretations of negative constructions of the form X is not her/his forte/ best attribute
- 3.2.5Study 7: Distribution of default negative sarcasm and default affirmative literalness of the form X is not the most Y
- 3.2.6Study 8: Distribution of type of resonance with default sarcastic interpretations of negative constructions of the form X is not the most Y
- 3.3Resonating with default literal interpretations of
affirmative metaphor and sarcasm
- 3.3.1Study 9: Distribution of type of resonance with default literal interpretations of affirmative sarcasm
- 3.3.2Study 10: Distribution of type of resonance with default literal interpretations of affirmative metaphors
- 3.1Resonating with default metaphorical interpretations of
negative constructions
- 4.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgments -
Notes -
References
Published online: 17 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.10.08gio
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.10.08gio
References
Becker, I., & Giora, R.
Colston, L. H., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
Du Bois, J. W., & Giora R.
Fein, O., Yeari M., & Giora, R.
Filik, R., Howman, H., Ralph-Nearman. C., & Giora, R.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
Giora, R.
Giora, R., & Balaban, N.
Giora, R., Cholev, A., Fein, O., & Peleg, O.
Giora, R., Drucker, A., & Fein, O.
Giora, R., Drucker, A., Fein, O., & Mendelson, I.
Giora, R., & Fein, O.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Aschkenazi, K., & Alkabets-Zlozover, I.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kotler, N., & Shuval, N.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N., & Zur, A.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Laadan, D., Wolfson, J., Zeituny, M., Kidron, R., Kaufman, R., & Shaham, R.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Metuki, N., & Stern, P.
Giora, R., Fein, O., & Schwartz, T.
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Becker, I.
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O.
Giora, R., Givoni, S., Heruti, V., & Fein, O.
Giora, R., & Gur, I.
Giora, R., Jaffe, I., Becker, I., & Fein, O.
Giora, R., Livnat, E., Fein, O., Barnea, A., Zeiman, R., & Berger, I.
Giora, R., Raphaely, M., Fein, O., & Livnat, E.
Givoni, S., & Giora, R.
Goldenberg, S.
(2008, November 3) Joke on Palin again as she falls for fake Sarkozy call. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/03/sarah-palin-phone-prank-sarkozy
Jakubíček, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovář, V., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V.
(2013) The
TenTen corpus
family. In
7th
International Corpus Linguistics
Conference
(pp. 125–127). Lancaster,
UK, July
2013.
James, E.
Joan
(2008) 20
Responses to “Bridget Moynahan Must Have Laughed, or Why I’m
Almost Glad the Patriots
Lost”. March 28,
2008. http://www.collegiatetimes.com/blogs/2008/02/05/bridget-moynahan-must-have-laughed-or-why-im-almost-glad-the-patriots-lost/
Kotthoff, H.
Levy, G.
(3 March 2008a) Spotlight on the lesser evil. http://www.haaretz.com/printedition/opinion/spotlight-on-the-lesser-evil-1.251007
Mazali, R.
(2006) There
is no Israeli Ceasefire in
Gaza. (Translated from Hebrew).
Talk in Tel Aviv for December 2 Demo – Coalition to Stop the
Siege of Gaza. December 2, 2006. https://tinyurl.com/y8phjuw4
Mebrod
(2010) Near misses in obedience training! LOL http://www.dobermantalk.com/general-training-obedience/37864-near-misses-obedience-training-lol.html
Partington, A.
Pexman, P., Ferretti, T., & Katz, A.