Chapter published in:
Producing Figurative Expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectives
Edited by John Barnden and Andrew Gargett
[Figurative Thought and Language 10] 2020
► pp. 211236
Beardsley, M. C.
(1958) Aesthetics. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Becker, I., & Giora, R.
(2018) The Defaultness Hypothesis: How speakers cue default literal and sarcastic interpretations – a quantitative corpus-based study of non/default sarcasm and literalness production. Journal of pragmatics, 138, 149–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, L. H., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(2002) Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 57–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
(2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., & Giora R.
(2014) From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 351–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fein, O., Yeari M., & Giora, R.
(2015) On the priority of salience-based interpretations: The case of irony. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
Filik, R., Howman, H., Ralph-Nearman. C., & Giora, R.
(2018) The role of defaultness in sarcasm interpretation: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3), 148–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
(1998) Counter point commentary. In A. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs, & M. Turner (Eds.), Figurative language and thought (pp. 158–192). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, R.
(1997) Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) “A good Arab is not a dead Arab – a racist incitement”: On the accessibility of negated concepts. In I. Kecskés, & L. R. Horn (Eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects, (pp. 129–162). Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
(2012) “Your baby is no longer an infant”. On metaphor as context. In M. Gluzman, & O. Lubin (Eds.), Intertextuality in literature and culture (pp. 245–257). Tel Aviv: Hakibbuz Hameuchad. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
(2021) The defaultness hypothesis – affirmative sarcasm negative sarcasm: Which will be faster to process? Which will rely on cueing? Which will be more entertaining? Cognitive Linguistics Studies, 8(1).Google Scholar
Giora, R., & Balaban, N.
(2001) Lexical access in text production: On the role of salience in metaphor resonance. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation (pp. 111–124). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Cholev, A., Fein, O., & Peleg, O.
(2018) On the Superiority of Defaultness: Hemispheric perspectives of processing negative and affirmative sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3), 163–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Drucker, A., & Fein, O.
(2014a) Resonating with default nonsalient interpretations: A corpus-based study of negative sarcasm. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 28, 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Drucker, A., Fein, O., & Mendelson, I.
(2015a) Default sarcastic interpretations: On the priority of nonsalient interpretations. Discourse Processes, 52(3), 173–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., & Fein, O.
(1999) On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 919–929. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Aschkenazi, K., & Alkabets-Zlozover, I.
(2007) Negation in context: A functional approach to suppression. Discourse Processes, 43, 153–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kotler, N., & Shuval, N.
(2015b)  Know Hope: Metaphor, optimal innovation, and pleasure. In G. Brône, K. Feyaerts, & T. Veale (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics and humor research. Current trends and new developments (pp. 129–146). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N., & Zur, A.
(2004) Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 115–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Laadan, D., Wolfson, J., Zeituny, M., Kidron, R., Kaufman, R., & Shaham, R.
(2007) Expecting irony: Context vs. salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 119–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Metuki, N., & Stern, P.
(2010) Negation as a metaphor-inducing operator. In L. Horn (Ed.), The expression of negation (pp. 225–256). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., & Schwartz, T.
(1998) Irony: Graded salience and indirect negation. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(2), 83–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Becker, I.
(2020) How defaultness affects text production: Resonating with default interpretations of negative sarcasm. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), The diversity of irony (pp. 66–77). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O.
(2015c) Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(4), 290–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., Heruti, V., & Fein, O.
(2017) The role of defaultness in affecting pleasure: The optimal innovation hypothesis revisited. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(1), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., & Gur, I.
(2003) Irony in conversation: Salience and context effects. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meanings in language and mind (pp. 297–316). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Jaffe, I., Becker, I., & Fein, O.
(2018) Strongly attenuating highly positive concepts: The case of default sarcastic interpretations. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 19–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Livnat, E., Fein, O., Barnea, A., Zeiman, R., & Berger, I.
(2013) Negation generates nonliteral interpretations by default. Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 89–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Raphaely, M., Fein, O., & Livnat, E.
(2014b) Resonating with contextually inappropriate interpretations in production: The case of irony. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 443–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givoni, S., & Giora, R.
(2018) Salience and Defaultness. In F. Liedtke, & A. Tuchen (Eds.), Handbuch Pragmatik (pp. 207–2013). Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, S.
(2008, November 3) Joke on Palin again as she falls for fake Sarkozy call. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://​www​.guardian​.co​.uk​/world​/2008​/nov​/03​/sarah​-palin​-phone​-prank​-sarkozy
Jakubíček, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovář, V., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V.
(2013) The TenTen corpus family. In 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference (pp. 125–127). Lancaster, UK, July 2013.
James, E.
(2015) Protecting the colton bride. https://​tinyurl​.com​/ybc54eebGoogle Scholar
(2008) 20 Responses to “Bridget Moynahan Must Have Laughed, or Why I’m Almost Glad the Patriots Lost”. March 28, 2008. http://​www​.collegiatetimes​.com​/blogs​/2008​/02​/05​/bridget​-moynahan​-must​-have​-laughed​-or​-why​-im​-almost​-glad​-the​-patriots​-lost/
Kotthoff, H.
(2003) Responding to irony in different contexts: Cognition and conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1387–1411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazali, R.
(2006) There is no Israeli Ceasefire in Gaza. (Translated from Hebrew). Talk in Tel Aviv for December 2 Demo – Coalition to Stop the Siege of Gaza. December 2, 2006. https://​tinyurl​.com​/y8phjuw4Google Scholar
Partington, A.
(2011) Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1786–1800. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P., Ferretti, T., & Katz, A.
(2000) Discourse factors that influence irony detection during on-line reading. Discourse Processes, 29, 201–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veale, T.
(2018) The “default” in our stars: Signposting non-defaultness in ironic discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3),175–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar