Chapter published in:
Producing Figurative Expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectives
Edited by John Barnden and Andrew Gargett
[Figurative Thought and Language 10] 2020
► pp. 449468


(350 BC) Rhetoric, Trans. by W. Rhys Roberts, 1954. Available online from http://​classics​.mit​.edu​/Aristotle​/rhetoric​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J.
(2017) Irony, pretence and fictively-elaborating hyperbole. In A. Athanasiadou, & Herbert L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 145–178). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) Uniting irony, hyperbole and metaphor in a pretence-based framework. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Ed.), On the diversity of irony. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Barnden, J., & Popa-Wyatt, M.
(2012) Hyperbole in irony. In 4th UK-Cognitive Linguistics Conference (UK-CLC4), Kings’ College, London.
Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E.
(2005) A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carston, R., & Wearing, C.
(2015) Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, 79–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R.
(1984) On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L.
(2013) Presentation 2.1.13 at the University of Alberta. https://​vimeo​.com​/58920047
(2015) Using figurative language. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J.
(2000) Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishment of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30(2), 179–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B.
(1998) You’ll never believe this: irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), 499–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Currie, G. (2006) Why irony is pretence. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The architecture of the imagination (pp. 111–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J., Coulson, S., & Oakley, T.
(1999) Blending and metaphor. In G. Steen, & R. W. Gibbs (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M.
(1995) Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 21–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasersohn, P.
(2005) Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6), 643–686. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peña, S., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2017) Construing and constructing hyperbole. In A. Athanasiadou (Ed.), Studies in figurative thought and language (pp. 41–73). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M.
(2009)  Figuring the code: Pragmatic routes to the non-literal . PhD dissertation. University of Geneva.
(2010a) Ironic metaphor interpretation. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 33.Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2010b) Ironic metaphor: A case for metaphor’s contribution to truth-conditions. In E. Walaszewska, M. Kisielewska-Krysiuk, & A. Piskorska (Eds.), In the mind and across minds: A relevance-theoretic perspective on communication and translation (pp. 224–245). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2014) Pretence and echo: Towards an integrated account of verbal irony. International Review of Pragmatics, 6, 127–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Compound figures: Priority and speech-act structure. Philosophical Studies, 174(1), 141–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Embedding irony and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Inquiry, 62/6, 674–699.Google Scholar
(2020) Hyperbolic figures. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Ed.), On the diversity of irony. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(ms) Compound figures: intention structure and communicative channels.
Recanati, F.
(2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubio-Fernández, P., Wearing, C., & Carston, R.
(2015) Metaphor and hyperbole: Testing the continuity hypothesis. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(1), 24–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2014) Mapping concepts. Understanding figurative thought from a cognitive-linguistic perspective. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 27(1), 187–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2020) Figurative language: relations and constraints. In A. Gargett, & J. Barnden (Ed.), Figurative thought and language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A.
(2014) Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Walton, K.
(1990) Mimesis as make-believe: on the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2017) Meiosis, hyperbole, irony. Philosophical Studies, 174(1), 105–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D.
(2006) The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 116, 1722–1743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Irony, hyperbole, jokes and banter. In J. Blochowiak, C. Grisot, S. Durrleman, & C. Laenzlinger (Eds.), Formal models in the study of language (pp. 201–219). Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar