Part of
Figurativity and Human Ecology
Edited by Alexandra Bagasheva, Bozhil Hristov and Nelly Tincheva
[Figurative Thought and Language 17] 2022
► pp. 112
References
Baicchi, A.
(2020) Figurativeness all the way down. By way of introduction. In Baicchi, A. (Ed.), Figurative meaning construction in thought and language (pp. 1–10). [Figurative Thought and Language, 9]. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, D., Chumakina, M., & Corbett, G.
(Eds.) (2012) Canonical Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Devylder, S., & Zlatev, J.
(2020) Cutting and Breaking Metaphors of the Self and the Motivation and Sedimentation Model. In Baicchi, A. (Ed.), Figurative meaning construction in thought and language (pp. 254–281). [Figurative Thought and Language, 9]. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(2012) Metaphors, snowflakes, and termite nests: How nature creates such beautiful things. In MacArthur, F., Oncins-Martinez, J.-L., Piquer-Piriz, A., & Sancez-Garcia, M. (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Culture, context, and communication (pp. 347–372). Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H.
(2012) Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grondelaers, S., & Geeraerts, D.
(2003) Towards a pragmatic model of cognitive onomasiology. In Hubert Cuyckens, H., Dirven, R., and Taylor, J. (Eds.) Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics (pp. 67–92). [Cognitive Linguistics Research 23]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B.
(2017) Embodiment and Discourse: Dimensions and Dynamics of Contemporary Metaphor Theory. In Hampe, B. (Ed.). Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse (pp. 3–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G.
(2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(2010) Cognitive Ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science 2, 705–715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, A., Cacciari, C., Gibbs, R. W., and Turner, M.
(1998) Figurative Language and Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lotman, J.
(2005/1984) On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 33(1), 205–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A.
(2014) Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., Bolognesi, M., & Zlatev, J.
(2019) A cognitive semiotic exploration of metaphors in Greek street art. Cognitive Semiotics, 12(1) Special Issue: The rhetoric of contemporary metaphor theory edited by Göran Sonesson and Peer F. Bundgaard, 1–20. 20192008. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.
(1986) From Polysemy to Internal Semantic Reconstruction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 539–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., Jacobsson, G. and Paju, L.
(2021) Desiderata for metaphor theory, the Motivation and Sedimentation Model and motion-emotion metaphoremes. In A. de Silva (Ed.), Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage (pp. 41–74). [Figurative Thought and Laguage, 11]. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar