Cover not available
Part of
Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising
Paula Pérez Sobrino
[Figurative Thought and Language 2] 2017
► pp. 213–226

References

Ang, S. & Lim, E.
(2006) The influence of metaphors and product type on brand personality perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 39–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
(2008) Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., Bates, D. M.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H. & Milin, P.
(2010) Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research 3(2): 12–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babarczy, A., Bencze, M. Fekete & Simon, E.
(2010) The automatic identification of conceptual metaphors in Hungarian texts: A corpus-based analysis. In N. Bel, B. Daille & A. Vasiljevs (Eds.), Methods for the automatic acquisition of language resources and their evaluation method: Proceedings of LREC 2010 Workshop (pp. 31–36). Retrieved on 13rd June 2014 from [URL]
Barcelona, A.
(Ed.) (2000) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2005) The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza & S. Peña (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 313–352). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2011) Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In A. Barcelona, R. Benczes & F. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.) Defining metonymy in a Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–58). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A.
(2010) Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D. M., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B.
(2012) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0.Google Scholar
Beijk, J. & Van Raaij, W. F.
(1989) Schemata: Informatieverwerking, Beïnvloedingsprocessen en Reclame [Schemas: Information Processing, Persuasion Strategies and Advertising]. Amsterdam: VEA.Google Scholar
Benczes, R., Barcelona, A. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
(2011) Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. & Milkman, K. L.
(2012) What Makes Online Content Viral. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergh, L. & Beelders, T.
(2014) An eye-tracking account of reference points, cognitive affordance and multimodal metaphors. In: A. Maiorani & C. Christie (Eds.), Multimodal Epistemologies: Towards an Integrated Framework. Routledge:Google Scholar
Bhattacharjee, C.
(2006) Services Marketing (1st Edition). New Delhi: Excel Books.Google Scholar
Black, M.
(1955) Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 55, 273–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L.
(2011) How Languages Construct Time. In S. Dehaene & E. Brannon (Eds.,) Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought (pp. 333–341). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar-Szab., R. & Brdar, M.
(2011) What do metonymic chains reveal about the nature of metonymy? In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 217–248). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgers, C., Konijn, E., Steen, G. & Iepsma, M.
(2015) Making ads less complex, yet more creative and persuasive: the effects of conventional metaphors and irony in print advertising. International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications, 34, 515–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgers, C., Eden, A., de Jong, R. & Buningh, S.
(2016) Rousing reviews and instigative images: The impact of online reviews and visual design characteristics on app downloads. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(3), 327–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacciopo, J. & Petty, R.
(1982) The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., Feinstein, J. & Jarvis, B.
(1996) Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 197–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callow, M. & Schiffman, L.
(1999) A Visual Esperanto? The Pictorial Metaphor in Global Advertising. In B. Dubois, T. Lowrey, L. Shrum & M. Vanhuele (Eds.) E – European Advances in Consumer Research 4 (pp. 17–20). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Camara-Pereira, F.
(2007) Creativity and artificial intelligence: A conceptual blending approach. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carston, R.
(2002) Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics. Mind & Language, 17(1–2), 127–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Metaphor: Ad Hoc Concepts, Literal Meaning and Mental Images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 110(3), 295–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. & Wearing, C.
(2014) Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition, 3(2), 283–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D.
(2009) Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138 (3), 351–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. -T. & Yen, C. -T.
(2013) Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of advertising, 42(1), 80–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chun, L.
(1997a) A cognitive approach to UP metaphors in English and Chinese: What do they reveal about the English mind and the Chinese mind? Research degree progress report for Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 125–140.Google Scholar
(1997b) Conceptualizing the world through spatial metaphors: An analysis of UP ⁄ DOWN vs. SHANG ⁄ XIA metaphors. Proceeding of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwa, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cienki, A.
(1998) Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J. P. Koenig (ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (pp. 189–204), Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Citron, F. & Goldberg, A.
(2014) Metaphorical Sentences Are More Emotionally Engaging than Their Literal Counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(11), 2585–2595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. & Clark, E.
(1977) Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Cook, G.
(1992) The Discourse of Advertising (revised edition published in 2001) London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Copeland, M.
(1924) Principles of Merchandising. Chicago: A. W. Shaw.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. & Crae, R. R.
(1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Coulson, S.
(1996) The Menendez Brothers Virus: Analogical Mapping in Blended Spaces. In A. Goldberg (Ed.) Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language (pp. 67–81). Palo Alto, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Coulson, S. & Pagán-Cánovas, C.
(2009) Understanding Timelines: Conceptual Metaphor and Conceptual Integration. Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2): 198–219.Google Scholar
Cruse, D.
(1986) Lexical Semantics. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dens, N. & De Pelsmacker, P.
(2010) Consumer responses to different advertising appeals for new products: the moderating influence of branding strategy and product category involvement. Journal of Brand Management, 18 (1): 50–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vellis, R.
(2002) Scale development: theory and applications: theory and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dirven, R.
(2002) Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.) Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 75–112). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
(2010) Looking back at 30 years of Cognitive Linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choiński & L. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in action. From theory to application and back (pp. 13–70). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dobele, A., Lindgreen, A., Beverland, M., Vanhamme, J. & Wijk, R. v.
(2007) Why pass on viral messages? Because they connect emotionally. Business Horizons, 50, 291–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englund, A.
(2010) Intermedial Topography and Metaphorical Interaction. In L. Elleström (Ed.), Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality (pp. 69–80). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V.
(2007) A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
Falk, D.
(2000) Hominid brain evolution and the origin of music. In N. L. Wallin, B. Merker & S. Brown (Eds.), The Origins of Music (pp. 197–216). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
(1994) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language (2nd Ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Conceptual blending. Entry for The Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 2495–2498) Retrieved on 18th February 2015 from: [URL] doi: DOI logo
Fauconnier, G. & Sweetser, E.
(Eds.) (1996) Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.
(1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22 (2), 133–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Feldman, J.
(2006) From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Feng, D. & O’Halloran, K.
(2013) The multimodal representation of emotion in film: Integrating cognitive and semiotic approaches. Semiotica, 197, 79–100.Google Scholar
Festinger, L.
(1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R.
(2002): Communicating: The multiple modes of human interconnection. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A.
(1983) Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Forceville, Ch.
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge, London and New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Review article of Kress and Van Leeuwen (1996) “Educating the eye? Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design”. Language and Literature, 8(2), 163–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Addressing an audience: time, place, and genre in Peter Van Straaten’s calendar cartoons. Humor, 18 (3), 247–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.) Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2008) Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In E. McQuarrie & B. Phillips (Eds.), Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric (pp. 272–310). New York/London: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
(2009a) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research In Ch. Forceville & E. Uriós-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2009b) Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In E. Ventola & A. J. Moya (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues (56–74). Basingstoke: Palgrave-McMillan.Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles
(2009c) Review of Royce & Bowcher (Eds) “New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1459–1463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Ch.
(2011a) A Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor. Retrieved on 19th April 2012. [URL]
(2011b) Review of Elleström, L. (Ed.) (2010) “Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality”. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3091–3094. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Relevance Theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. In D. Machin (Ed.) Visual Communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2016) Mixing in pictorial and multimodal metaphors? In R. Gibbs, (Ed.) Mixing metaphor (pp. 223–239). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Forceville, Ch. & Clark, B.
(2014) Can pictures have explicatures?. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 14(3), 451–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Ch. & Jeulink, M.
(2011) The flesh and blood of embodied understanding: the source-path-goal schema in animation film. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(1), 37–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Ch. & Renckens, T.
(2013) The GOOD IS LIGHT and BAD IS DARK metaphor in feature films. Metaphor and the Social World, 3, 160–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Ch. & Uriós-Aparisi, E.
(Eds.) (2009) Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S. & Pickering, M. J.
(1999) The processing of metonymy: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1366–1383.Google Scholar
Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H. & Shu, D., Mao, S., Boroditsky, L.
(2011) How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35, 1305–1328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fyock, J.
(2011) The persuasiveness of visual hyperbole. MA dissertation, University of Pensylvania. Retrieved on 25th November 2016 from: [URL]
Gallese, V. & Lakoff, G.
(2005) The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 455–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentleman, R. & Lang, D.
(2007) Statistical Analyses and Reproducible Research. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 16 (1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, A.
(2010) Narrative worlds and multimodal figures in House of Leaves: “-find your own words; I have no more”. In M. Grishakova & M. Ryan (Eds.) Intermediality and Storytelling (pp. 285–311). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.
(1984) Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 275–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3/4), 317–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006a) Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21(3), 434–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Introspection and cofnitive linguistics: Should we trust our own intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 135–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Why cognitive linguistics should care more about empirical methods. In M. González, M. Spivey, S. Coulson & I. Mittelberg (Eds.), Empirical methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 2–18). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2016) Mixing Metaphor. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., Buchalter, D., Moise, J. & Farrar, W.
(1993) Literal meaning and figurative language. Discourse Processes, 16, 387–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., Bogdonovic, J., Sykes, J. & Barr, D.
(1997) Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 141–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. & Colston, H.
(1995) The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. & Tendahl, M.
(2006) Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind & Language, 21, 379–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R.
(2002) On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N. & Zur, A.
(2004) Weapons of Mass Distraction: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure Ratings. Metaphor & Symbol, 19(2), 115–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gkiouzepas, L. & Hogg, M.
(2011) Articulating a New Framework for Visual Metaphors in Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 40 (1), 103–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goossens, L.
(1990) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) “THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited”. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (4), 267–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation vs. resemblance. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1595–1614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J., Oakley, T. & Coulson, S.
(1999) Blending and metaphor. In R. Gibbs & Steen, G. (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, E.
(1966) The hidden dimension. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.
(1978) Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1994) Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hanks, P.
(2014) Creatively exploiting linguistic norms. In T. Veale, K. Feyaerts & Ch. Forceville (Eds.), Creativity and the agile mind: A multi-disciplinary study of a multi-faceted phenomenon (pp. 119–138). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harder, P.
(2003) Mental spaces: Exactly when do we need them? Cognitive Linguistics , 14, 91–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haser, V.
(2005) Metaphor, metonymy, and experientialist philosophy: Challenging cognitive semantics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, L. & Kraljevic, B.
(2011) Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. In F. Gonzálvez, S. Peña & L. Pérez-Hernández (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy revisited beyond the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Special issue of the Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 153–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Metaphorical creativity across modes. Special issue of Metaphor and the Social World 3(2).Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2006) Chained metonymies. In J. Newman & S. Rice (Eds.), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Holsanova, J.
(2014) Reception of multimodality: Applying eye tracking methodology in multimodal research. In C. Hewitt (Ed.) Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (2nd edition) (pp. 285–296). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe, I.
(2008) Vision metaphors for the intellect: Are they really cross-linguistic? Atlantis, 30(1), 15–33.Google Scholar
Inhoff, A., Lima, S. & Carroll, P.
(1984) Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading. Memory and Cognition, 12(6), 558–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeong, S.
(2007) Effects of News About Genetics and Obesity on Controllability Attribution and Helping Behavior. Health Communication, 22(3), 221–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Visual Metaphor in Advertising: Is the Persuasive Effect Attributable to Visual Argumentation or Metaphorical Rhetoric? Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(1), 59–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey
(Ed.) 2009 The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jolley, R., Zhi, Z. & Thomas, G.
(1998) The development of understanding moods metaphorically expressed in pictures: A crosscultural comparison. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 29: 358–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joy, A., Sherry, F. & Deschenes, J.
(2009) Conceptual blending in advertising. Journal of Business Research, 62, 39–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M.
(2011) Two Hearts in Three-quarter Time: How to Waltz the Social Media/Viral Marketing Dance. Business Horizons, 54, 253–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, A. & Ferretti, T.
(2001) Moment-by-moment comprehension of proverbs in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3/4), 193–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kertész, A. & Rákosi
(2009) Cyclic vs. circular argumentation in the Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cognitive Linguistics 20: 703–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitchen, P.
(Ed.) (2008) Marketing metaphors and metamorphosis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave McMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klepousniotou, E. & Baum, S.
(2007) Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, V.
(2009) Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In Ch. Forceville & E. Uriós-Aparisi (Eds), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 45–71). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G.
(1997) Marketing: An introduction (4th Ed.) New Jersey: Prentince Hall International.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(1990) Emotion Concepts. Berlin/New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. & Radden, G.
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 37–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, G.
(2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. & Leeuwen, T.
(1996, revised edition published in 2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
(2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) The neural theory of metaphor. In: Gibbs, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J. & Schwartz, A.
(1991) Master Metaphor List (2nd draft copy). Retrieved on 14th June 2017 for the last time from: [URL]
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M.
(1989) More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
(1989) Book review of Sperber & Wilson (1986), “Relevance: communication and cognition”. Journal of Linguistics, 25, 455–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(2009) Language and mind: Let’s get the issues straight! In S. D. Blum (Ed.), Making sense of language: Readings in culture and communication (pp. 95–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. & Low, G.
(2006) Figurative Thinking and Foreign Language Learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., Trautman-Chen, P., Koester, A. & Barnden, J.
(2011) Difficulties in Metaphor Comprehension Faced by International Students whose First Language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 408–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, L. & Zhang, J.
(2009) The effects of spatial metaphorical representations of time on cognition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 41(4), 266–271.Google Scholar
Lonergan, J. and Gibbs, R.
(2016) Tackling mixed metaphors in discourse: New corpus and psychological experience. In R. Gibbs. (Ed.) Mixing metaphor (pp. 57–71). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D.
(1986) Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lundmark, C.
(2003) Puns and blending: The case of print advertisements. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Logroño 20–25 July 2003 Retrieved 21st March 2013. [URL].
Mairal, R. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
(2009) Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In C. Butler & J. Mart.n Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing constructions (pp. 153–198). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markert, K. & Nissim, M.
(2002) Towards a Corpus Annotated for Metonymies: the Case of Location Names. Proceedings of the third International Conference on Language Resource and Evaluation (LREC 2002), Las Palmas, Spain.Google Scholar
McArthur, F. & Littlemore, J.
(2008) Exploring the Figurative Continuum: A Discovery Approach Using Corpora in the Foreign Language Classroom. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.) Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology (pp. 159–188). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, E. & Mick, D.
(1999) Visual rhetoric in advertising: text interpretive, experimental and reader-response analysis”. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) The contribution of semiotic and rhetorical perspectives to the explanation of visual persuasion in advertising. In L. Scott & R. Batra (Eds.), Persuasive Imagery: A Consumer Response Perspective (pp. 191–221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2009) A laboratory study of the effect of verbal rhetoric versus repetition when consumers are not directed to process advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 287–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McQuarrie, E. F. & Phillips, B.
(2005) Indirect persuasion in advertising: How consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 7–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesirov, J.
(2010) Computer science. Accessible reproducible research. Science 327 (5964): 415–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, A. & Olson, J.
(1981) Are product attribute belief the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitudes? Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 318–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, I. & Waugh, L.
(2009) Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought and co-speech gesture”. In Ch. Forceville & E. Uriós-Aparisi, (Eds) Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 329–357). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morgan, S. & Reichert, T.
(1999) The message is in the metaphor: Assessing the comprehension of metaphors in advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moya, A.
(2011) Visual metonymy in children’s picture books. In M. J. Pinar (Ed.) Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. Special issue of Review of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 336–352). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Moya, A. & Pinar, M.
(2008) Compositional, interpersonal and representational meanings in a children’s narrative. A multimodal discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(9), 1601–1619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C.
(2016) Why mixed metaphors make sense. In R. Gibbs (Ed.) Mixing metaphor (pp. 31–56). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Müller, C. & Cienki, A.
(2009) Words, gestures, and beyond: forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In Ch. Forceville & E. Uriós-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimdodal Metaphor (pp. 297–328). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Murphy, G.
(1996) On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60, 173–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolajeva, M. & Scott, C.
(2001) How Picturebooks Work. Children’s Literature and Culture. London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Norrick, N.
(1981) Semiotic principles in semantic theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, S.
(2009) Modal density and modal configurations: Multimodal actions. In C. Jewit (Ed.) Routledge Handbook for Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 78–90). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, L.
(2005) Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Michael
(2010) The Language of Displayed Art (Second edition). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oakley, T.
(1996) Conceptual Blending and Counterfactual Spaces. In A. Monaghan (Ed.) The Fifth International Conference on the Cognitive Science of Natural Language Processing. Dublin: Natural Language Group.Google Scholar
Ortiz, M.
(2011) Primary metaphors and monomodal visual metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1568–1580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A.
(1979) Metaphor and Thought. Cambdrige: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Packer, C., Swanson, A., Ikanda, D. & Kushnir, H.
(2011) Fear of darkness, the full moon and the nocturnal ecology of African lions. PloS one, 6, e22285.Google Scholar
Panther, K. & Radden, G.
(1999) Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K. & Thornburg, L.
(Eds.) (2003) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam/Philadelpia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parry, S., Jones, R., Stern, P. & Robinson, M.
(2013) ‘Shockvertising’: An exploratory investigation into attitudinal variations and emotional reactions to shock advertising. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12, 112–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pease, K.
(1999) A review of street lighting evaluations: Crime reduction effects. In K. Painter & N. Tilley (Eds.), Surveillance of public space: CCTV, street lighting and crime prevention, crime prevention studies 10 (pp. 47–76). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Peng, R.
(2011) Reproducible research in computational science. Science 334 (6060): 1226–1227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Hernández, L.
(2011) Cognitive Tools for Successful Branding. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 369–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013a) Illocutionary constructions: (multiple-source)-in-target metonymies, illocutionary ICMs, and specification links. Language & Communication, 33(2), 128–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b) Approaching the utopia of a global brand: The relevance of image schemas as multimodal resources for the branding industry. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 285–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Cognitive grounding for cross-cultural commercial communication. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(2), 203–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P.
(2013a) Metaphor use in advertising: analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy in a greenwashing advertisement. In E. Gola & F. Ervas (Eds.) Metaphor in Focus: Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor Use (pp. 67–82). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2013b) Onomatopoeia in advertising: Beyond the notion of mode. In A. Llanes, L. Astrid, L. Gallego & R. Mateu (Eds.), Applied Linguistics in the Age of Globalization (pp. 426–434). Lerida: University of Lerida UP.Google Scholar
(2014a) Multimodal cognitive operations in classical music. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 137–168.Google Scholar
(2014b) Conceptual disintegration and multimodal metonymy in musical understanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 70, 130–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising: A corpus-based account. Metaphor &Symbol, 31(2): 73–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Shockvertising: patterns of conceptual interaction constraining advertising creativity. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 65, 257–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P. & Littlemore, J.
(2017) Facing methodological challenges in multimodal metaphor research. In A. Baicchi & E. Pinelli (Eds.) Cognitive Modeling in Language and Discourse across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars UP.Google Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J. & Houghton, D.
forthcoming). Crosscultural variation in the reception of advertisements.
Perreault, W. & McCarthy, J.
(2002) Basic Marketing: A Global Managerial Approach. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Petäjäaho, E.
(2012) (Non-)metaphorical meaning constructions in advertising: a comparative study between American and Finnish beer commercials. Doctoral dissertation. Free University of Amsterdam. Retrieved on 12th February 2014 from: [URL]
Phillips, B. and McQuarrie, E.
(2002) ‘The Development, Change, and Transformation of Rhetorical Style in Magazine Advertisements 1954–1999’. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, B. & McQuarrie, E.
(2009) Impact of Advertising Metaphor on Consumer Belief: Delineating the Contribution of Comparison Versus Deviation Factors. Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 49–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, A.
(2000) Poetic effects: A relevance theory perspective. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 75. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Radden, G.
(2000) How metonymic are metaphors? In Antonio Barcelona (Ed.) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective (pp. 93–108). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, R.
(1993) Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin 114: 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M.
(1979) The Conduit Metaphor: a Case of Frame Conflict in our Language about Language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd edition 1993) (pp. 164–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ripple, R.
(1989) Ordinary creativity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(3), 189–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, D.
(2003) Argument is war – Or is it a game of chess? Multiple meanings in the analysis of implicit metaphors. Metaphor & Symbol, 18(2), 125–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Lost in “conceptual space”: Metaphors of conceptual integration. Metaphor & Symbol, 19(1), 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
(1998) On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 259–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2002) From semantic underdetermination, via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum. An International Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(6), 107–143.Google Scholar
(2005) Linguistic interpretation and cognition. In E. Croitoru, D. Tuchel & M. Praisler (Eds.) Cultural Matrix Reloaded. Romanian Society for English and American Studies. Seventh International Conference (pp. 36–64). Bucarest: Didactica Si Pedagogica.Google Scholar
(2007) High-level cognitive models: In search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behavior. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on metonymy (pp. 11–30). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2011) Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–123). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Meaning construction, meaning interpretation, and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In B. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into functional linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar (pp. 231–270). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. & Díez, O.
(2002) Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. & Galera, A.
(2011) Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3(1),1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. & Mairal, R.
(2008) Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: an introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica, 42(2), 355–400.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. & Peña, S.
(2005) Conceptual interaction, cognitive operations and projection spaces. In: F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza & S. Peña (Eds.) Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. & Pérez-Hernández, L.
(2003) Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication. In K. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 23–49). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor & Symbol, 26: 161–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rundbland, G. & Annaz, D.
(2010) Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: Receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28 (3), 547–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schacter, D. S., Gilbert, D. T. & Wegner, D. M.
(2011) Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Schalley, A.
(2012) Practical theories and empirical practice – facets of a complex interaction. In A. Schalley (Ed.), Practical Theories and Empirical Practice. A Linguistic Perspective (pp. 1–34). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sergent, J., Zuch, E., Terriah, S., McDonald, B.
(1992) Distributed neural network underlying musical sight-reading and keyboard performance. Sci 257: 106–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seuren, P.
(1988) The self-styling of relevance theory. Journal of Semantics, 5, 123–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šorm, E. & Steen, G.
forthcoming). VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor Identification. In G. Steen Ed. Visual metaphor: Structure and Process Amsterdam/Philadelphia John Benjamins
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
(1985) Loose talk. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LXXXVI, 153–71.Google Scholar
(1986) Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1987) Presumptions of relevance. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 10, 736–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Pragmatics. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Retrieved on 10th March 2016 from: [URL]
Stadler, J.
(2010) AIDS ads: make a commercial, make a difference? Corporate social responsibility and the media. Continuum, 18(4), 591–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.
(2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Mixed metaphor is a question of deliberateness. In: R. Gibbs (Ed.) Mixing Metaphor (pp. 113–132). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A.
(2006) Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 1–16). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I.
(1993) Creative Giftedness: A Multivariate Investment Approach. Gifted Child Quarterly 37(1): 7–15.Google Scholar
Tendahl, M.
(2009) A hybrid theory of metaphor: Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tendahl, M. & Gibbs, R.
(2008) Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive Linguistics and Relevance Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1823–1864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ting, H. & de Run, E.
(2012) Generations X and Y Attitude towards Controversial Advertising. Asian Journal of Business Research, 2(2), 18–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toncar, M. & Munch, J.
(2001) Consumer responses to tropes in print advertising. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 55–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G.
(1995) Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(3), 183–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Metaphor, Metonymy, and Binding. Retrieved 13th February 2014 from: [URL].
Tynan, C., McKechnie, S. & Chhuon, C.
(2006) Co-creating value for luxury brands”. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1156–1163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uriós-Aparisi, E.
(2009) Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In Ch. Forceville & E. Uriós-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 95–118). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Mulken, M., le Pair, R. & Forceville, Ch.
(2010) The Impact of Perceived Complexiy, Deviation and Comprehension on the Appreciation of Visual Metaphor in Advertising Across Three European Countries. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3418–3430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veale, T., Feyaerts, K. & Forceville, Ch.
(Eds.) (2014) Creativity and the agile mind: A multi-disciplinary study of a multi-faceted phenomenon. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Velasco, M. & Fuertes, P.
(2006) Olfactory and olfactory-mixed metaphors in print ads of perfume. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 217–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ventola, E. & A. Moya
(Eds) (2009) The World Told and the World Shown: Issues in Multisemiotics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vervaeke, J. & Kennedy, J. M.
(1996) Metaphors in language and thought: Falsification and multiple meanings. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11(4), 273–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villacañas, B. & White, M.
(2013) Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in Purificación García advertising campaigns. In L. Hidalgo & B. Kraljevic (Eds.) Metaphorical creativity across modes: Special issue of Metaphor and the Social World, 3(2), 220–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waller, D.
(2004) What factors make controversial advertising offensive?: A Preliminary Study. ANZCA 2004 Proceedings, 1–10.Google Scholar
Winter, B.
(2014) Horror movies and the cognitive ecology of primary metaphors. Metaphor & Symbol, 29, 151–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, F.
(2005) Ad hoc concepts and visual metaphor? Towards relevant ad hoc pointers. 9th International Pragmatics Conference, Riva del Garda (Italy).Google Scholar
(2009) “Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account.” In Ch. Forceville and E. Uriós-Aparisi (Eds), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 147–172). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zatorre, R., Evans, A., Meyer, E. & Gjedde, A.
(1992): Lateralization of phonetic pitch discrimination in speech processing. Sci 256, 846–849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zbikowski, L.
(2002) Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory, and Analysis. AMS Studies in Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Music, language and multimodal metaphor. In Ch. Forceville & E. Uriós-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 359–382). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. & Ding, C.
(2003) Comparative study of temporal metaphor in English and Chinese. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 174(9), 31–34.Google Scholar
Zhu, H.
(2006) Spatio-temporal metaphor in English and Chinese. Sino-US English Teaching, 3(11) (Serial No.35), 75–78.Google Scholar