Chapter published in:
Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi
[Figurative Thought and Language 9] 2020
► pp. 187208
Blow, C. M.
(2012, August 31). The G.O.P fact vacuum. New York Times, The Opinion Pages.Google Scholar
Carston, R., & Wearing, C.
(2011) Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition, 3, 283–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J.
(2007) On the pretense theory of irony. In R. W. Gibbs & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader (pp. 25–33). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Colston, H. L.
(1997a) “I’ve never seen anything like it”: Overstatement, understatement and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 43–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes, 23, 25–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Dewey defeats Truman”: Interpreting ironic restatement. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(1), 44–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Contrast and assimilation in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 111–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) What figurative language development reveals about the mind. In A. C. Schalley, & D. Khlentzos (Eds.), Mental states. Volume 2: Language and cognitive structure (pp. 191–212). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015a) Under-determinedness, indirectness, figurativeness and Psychology: Sources of pragmatic effects in irony and hyperbole. International Symposium on Figurative Thought and Language. Pavia, Italy.
(2015b) Using figurative language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) How language makes meaning: Embodiment and conjoined antonymy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Carreno, A.
(2012) Hyperbole and deception: Dost thou protest too much? Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, Chicago, IL.
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B.
(1998) You’ll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), 499–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J.
(2000a) Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1557–1583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) Contrast of kind vs. contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30(2), 179–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(2000) Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor & Symbol, 15, 5–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L.
(2002) The risks and rewards of ironic communication. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 181–194). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.Google Scholar
(Eds.) (2007) Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Izett, C. D.
(2005) Irony as persuasive communication. In H. Colston, & A. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 131–152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T., & Grayer, A. R.
(1994) I am not a crook: Effects of denials on perceptions of a defendant’s guilt, personality, and motives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(23), 2132–2150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, C., & Su, L.
(2010) Metaphor and hyperbolic expressions of emotion in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5), 1380–1396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R.
(2004) Hyperbole, extreme case formulation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(9), 1727–1739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orthaber, S., & Márquez-Reiter, R.
(2011) ‘Talk to the hand’: Complaints to a public transport company. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(15), 3860–3876. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, D.
(2005) Frame shifting in humor and irony? Metaphor & Symbol, 20(4), 275–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J.
(1994) Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, 5, 159–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, W.
(1984) Hamlet. In D. Bevington (Ed.), The complete works of William Shakespeare, Vol. 3, (Act 3, Scene 2, line 228). New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J.
(2004) There’s risks in everything: Extreme-case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony. Discourse & Society, 15(6), 745–766. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D.
(1984) Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 130–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williams, J. P.
(1984) Does mention (or pretense) exhaust the concept of irony? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 127–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Carston, R.
(2007) A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and ad hoc concepts. Pragmatics, 1, 230–259.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
(2012) Relevance and meaning. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yandell, B.
(1979) Those who protest too much are seen as guilty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5(1), 44–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar