Cover not available
Article published In:
Gesture
Vol. 14:3 (2014) ► pp.320–350

Iconicity in vocalization, comparisons with gesture, and implications for theories on the evolution of language

| University of Wisconsin-Madison
| San José State University

Scholars have often reasoned that vocalizations are extremely limited in their potential for iconic expression, especially in comparison to manual gestures (e.g., Armstrong & Wilcox, 2007; Tomasello, 2008). As evidence for an alternative view, we first review the growing body of research related to iconicity in vocalizations, including experimental work on sound symbolism, cross-linguistic studies documenting iconicity in the grammars and lexicons of languages, and experimental studies that examine iconicity in the production of speech and vocalizations. We then report an experiment in which participants created vocalizations to communicate 60 different meanings, including 30 antonymic pairs. The vocalizations were measured along several acoustic properties, and these properties were compared between antonyms. Participants were highly consistent in the kinds of sounds they produced for the majority of meanings, supporting the hypothesis that vocalization has considerable potential for iconicity. In light of these findings, we present a comparison between vocalization and manual gesture, and examine the detailed ways in which each modality can function in the iconic expression of particular kinds of meanings. We further discuss the role of iconic vocalizations and gesture in the evolution of language since our divergence from the great apes. In conclusion, we suggest that human communication is best understood as an ensemble of kinesis and vocalization, not just speech, in which expression in both modalities spans the range from arbitrary to iconic.

Keywords: iconicity, language evolution, modality, sound symbolism, vocalization
Published online: 21 January 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.14.3.03per
References
Ahlner, Felix & Jordan Zlatev
(2011) Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies, 381, 298–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alpher, Barry
(2001) Ideophones in interaction with intonation and the expression of new information in some indigenous languages of Australia. In Erhard F.K. Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones (pp. 9–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arbib, Michael A
(2012) How the brain got language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, David F., William C. Stokoe, & Sherman E. Wilcox
(1995) Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, David F. & Sherman E. Wilcox
(2007) The gestural origin of language. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banse, Rainer & Klaus R. Scherer
(1996) Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 701, 614–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Madison & Edith J. Varon
(1933) An accessory study of phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology, 451, 76–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul
(2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 51, 341–345.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
(1986) Intonation and its parts: Melody in spoken English. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bremner, Andrew J., Serge Caparos, Jules Davidoff, Jan de Fockert, Karina J. Linnell, & Charles Spence
(2013) “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 1261, 165–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger W., Abraham H. Black, & Arnold E. Horowitz
(1955) Phonetic symbolism in natural languages. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 501, 388–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Call, Josep & Michael Tomasello
(Eds.) (2007) The gestural communication of apes and monkeys. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cartmill, Erica A., Sian Beilock, & Susan Goldin-Meadow
(2012) A word in the hand: Action, gesture and mental representation in humans and non-human primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 3671, 129–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker
(1994) African ideophones. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, & John J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 178–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H
(2003) Pointing and placing. In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing. Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 243–268). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, Nathaniel, Marcus Perlman, & Marlene Johansson Falck
(2014) The iconic use of pitch to express vertical space. In Barbara Dancygier, Mike Borkent, & Jennifer Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 393–410). Stanford: SCLI Publications.Google Scholar
Corballis, Michael
(2002) From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville
(1994) Gender and gender systems. In R. Asher (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. 31 (pp. 1347–1353). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda
(1983) Invariances in the acoustic expression of emotion during speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 864–881.Google Scholar
Cuskley, Christine
(2013) Mappings between linguistic sound and motion. Public Journal of Semiotics, 51, 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, R
(1961) The fitness of names to drawings: A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology, 521, 259–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Boer, Bart & Marcus Perlman
(2014) Physical mechanisms may be as important as brain mechanisms in evolution of speech. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37 (6), 552–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diffloth, Gerard
(1972) The notes on expressive meaning. In Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi, & Gloria C. Phares (Eds.), Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 440–447). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark
(2012) Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass, 61, 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, & N.J. Enfield
(2013) Is “Huh?” a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLoS ONE, 81, e78273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, Karen
(2002) Language, cognition, and brain: Insights from sign language research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fay, Nicolas, Michael Arbib, & Simon Garrod
(2013) How to bootstrap a human communication system. Cognitive Science, 371, 1356–1367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fay, Nicolas, Casey J. Lister, T. Mark Ellison, & Susan Goldin-Meadow
(2014) Creating a communication system from scratch: Gesture beats vocalization hands down. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feld, Steven
(1996) Waterfalls of song: an acoustemology of place resounding in Bosavi, Papua New Guinea. In Keith H. Basso & Steven Feld (Eds.), Senses of Place (pp. 91–135). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series.Google Scholar
Gebels, Gustav
(1969) An investigation of phonetic symbolism in different cultures. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 81, 310–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
(2003) The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how children learn language. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H
(1966) Some universals of language with special reference to the order of meaningful constituents. In Joseph Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. & James J. Jenkins
(1966) Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word, 221, 207–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
(1980) The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language, 561, 515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamano, Shoko
(1998) The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hardus, Madeleine E., Adriano R. Lameira, Carel P. Van Schaik, & Serge A. Wich
(2009) Tool use in wild orang-utans modifies sound production: A functionally deceptive innovation? Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2761, 3689–3694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewes, Gordon W
(1973) Primate communication and the gestural origins of language. Current Anthropology, 141, 5–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles
(1978) In search of Jove’s brow. American Speech, 531, 243–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, William D., Jared P. Taglialatela, & David A. Leavens
(2007) Chimpanzees differentially produce novel vocalizations to capture the attention of a human. Animal Behavior, 731, 281–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imai, Mutsumi & Sotaro Kita
(2014) The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369 (1651), 20130298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imai, Mutsumi, Sotaro Kita, Miho Nagumo, & Hiroyuki Okada
(2008) Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 1091, 54–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Linda R. Waugh
(1979) The sound shape of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
(1933) Symbolic value of the vowel i. In Otto Jespersen (Ed.), Linguistica (pp. 283–303). Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kantartzis, Katerina, Mutsumi Imai, & Sotaro Kita
(2011) Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science, 351, 575–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Barbara F., William Leben, & Robert Cohen
(2003) The meanings of consonants. Proceedings of the 29th Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 245–253).
Kendon, Adam
(1991) Some considerations for a theory of language origins. Man, (N.S.) 261, 602–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Language’s matrix. Gesture, 91, 352–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of ‘language’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130293 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klink, Richard R
(2000) Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters, 111, 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köhler, Wolfgang
(1929) Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Kovic, Vanja, Kim Plunkett, & Gert Westermann
(2010) The shape of words in the brain. Cognition, 1141, 19–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J
(1994) An investigation of phonetic symbolism as it relates to Mandarin Chinese. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, & John J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jerome
(2009) As well as words: Congo Pygmy hunting, mimicry, and play. In Rudolf Botha & Chris Knight (Eds.), The cradle of language (pp. 236–256). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K
(2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Daniel Casasanto
(2014) Meaningless words promote meaningful categorization. Language and Cognition, FirstView, 1–27.Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Rick Dale
(2015) The role of adaptation in understanding linguistic diversity. In Randy LaPolla & Rik De Busser (Eds.), The shaping of language: The relationship between the structures of languages and their social, cultural, historical, and natural environments (pp. 289–316).Google Scholar
MacNeilage, Peter F
(2008) Origin of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Massaro, Dominic W
(1998) Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maurer, Daphne, Thanujeni Pathman, & Catherine J. Mondloch
(2006) The shape of boubas: sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 91, 316–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William
(2001) Ideophones as the source of verb in northern Australian languages. In Erhard F.K. Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones (pp. 205–221). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David
(1992) Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2012) How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikone, Eve
(2001) Ideophones in the Balto-Finnic languages. In Erhard F. K.Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones (pp. 223–233). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, Padraic, Richard C. Shillcock, Morten H. Christiansen, & Simon Kirby
(2014) How arbitrary is language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Stanley S
(1933) Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology, 451, 53–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B
(1996) Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 281, 255–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) To be or not to be ideophonically impoverished. In Wai Fong Chiang, Elaine Chun, Laura Mahalingappa, & Siri Mehus (Eds.), SALSA XI: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society (pp. 131–142). Austin: University of Texas.
Nygaard, Lynne, Debora Herold, & Laura Namy
(2009) The semantics of prosody: Acoustic and perceptual correlates to word meaning. Cognitive Science, 331, 127–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J
(1994) The frequency code underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, & John J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 325–347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oswalt, Robert
(1994) Inanimate imitatives in English. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, & John J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 293–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parise, Cesare V. & Francesco Pavani
(2011) Evidence of sound symbolism in simple vocalizations. Experimental Brain Research, 2141, 373–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles S
(1955) Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In Justus Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 99–119). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Perlman, Marcus
(2010) Talking fast: The use of speech rate as iconic gesture. In Fey Perrill, Mark Turner, & Vera Tobin (Eds.), Meaning, form, and body (pp. 245–262). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Perlman, Marcus & Nathaniel Clark
(2015) Learned vocal and breathing behavior in an enculturated gorilla. Animal Cognition, 181, 1165–1179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlman, Marcus, Francine G. Patterson, & Ronald H. Cohn
(2012a) The human-fostered gorilla Koko shows breath control in play with wind instruments. Biolinguistics, 61, 433–444.Google Scholar
Perlman, Marcus, Joanne E. Tanner, & Barbara J. King
(2012b) A mother gorilla’s variable use of touch to guide her infant: Insights into iconicity and the relationship between gesture and action. In Simona Pika & Katja Liebal (Eds.), Developments in primate gesture research (pp. 55–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlman, Marcus & Raymond W. Gibbs Jr
(2013) Pantomimic gestures reveal the sensorimotor imagery of a human-fostered gorilla. Journal of Mental Imagery, 371, 73–96.Google Scholar
Perlman, Marcus, Rick Dale, & Gary Lupyan
(2014) Iterative vocal charades: The emergence of conventions in vocal communication. In Erica A. Cartmill, Sean Roberts, Heidi Lyn, & Hannah Cornish (Eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (EVOLANG10 ). New Jersey: World Scientific.
Perlman, Marcus, Nathaniel Clark, & Marlene Johansson Falck
(2015) Iconic prosody in story reading. Cognitive Science, 39 (6), 1348–1368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela & Gabriella Vigliocco
(2014) The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven & Ray Jackendoff
(2005) What’s special about the human language faculty? Cognition, 951, 201–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pitcher, Benjamin J., Alex Mesoudi, & Alan G. McElligott
(2013) Sex-biased sound symbolism in English-language first names. PLoS ONE, 81, e64825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, Vilayanur S. & Edward M. Hubbard
(2001) Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 81, 3–34.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard
Aural images. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, & John J. Ohala Eds. Sound symbolism pp. 276 292 Cambridge Cambridge University Press DOI logo
Rummer, Ralf, Judith Schweppe, René Schlegelmilch, & Martine Grice
(2014) Mood is linked to vowel type: The role of articulatory movements. Emotion, 141, 246–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
(2013) Vive la différence: Sign language and spoken language in language evolution. Language and Cognition, 51, 189–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
(1929) A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 121, 225–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
([1916] 1966) Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sauter, Disa A., Frank Eisner, Paul Ekman, & Sophie K. Scott
(2010) Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1071, 2408–2412.
Schultze-Berndt, Eva
(2001) Ideophone-like characteristics of uninflected predicates in Jaminjung (Australia). In Erhard F. K.Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones (pp. 355–373). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shintel, Hadas & Howard C. Nusbaum
(2007) The sound of motion in spoken language: Visual information conveyed by acoustic properties of speech. Cognition, 1051, 681–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Moving to the speed of sound: Context modulation of the effect of acoustic properties of speech. Cognitive Science, 321, 1063–1074. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shintel, Hadas, Howard C. Nusbaum, & Arika Okrent
(2006) Analog acoustic expression in speech communication. Journal of Memory and Language, 551, 167–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steklis, Horst D. & Stevan Harnad
(1976) From hand to mouth: Some critical stages in the evolution of language. In Stevan Harnad, Horst D. Steklis, & Jane B. Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech. Annals of the New York academy of sciences, 2801, 445–455.Google Scholar
Tanz, Christine
(1971) Sound symbolism in words relating to proximity and distance. Language and Speech, 141, 266–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taub, Sarah
(2001) Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Kevin J
(2007) KA-BOOM! A dictionary of comic book words, symbols & onomatopoeia. USA: Lulu.com.Google Scholar
Thompson, Patrick D. & Zachary Estes
(2011) Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 641, 2392–2404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
(2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ultan, R
(1978) Size-sound symbolism. In Joseph H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. 2: Phonology (pp. 527–568). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Urban, Matthias
(2011) Conventional sound symbolism in terms for organs of speech: A cross-linguistic study. Folia Linguistica, 451, 199–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Schaik, Carel P., Marc Ancrenaz, Gwendolyn Borgen, Birute Galdikas, Cheryl D. Knott, Ian Singleton, Akira Suzuki, Sri Suci Utami, & Michelle Merrill
(2003) Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 31, 102–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Violi, Patrizia
(Ed.) (2000) Phonosymbolism and poetic language. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda
(2000) Against arbitrariness: Imitation and motivation revived. In Patrizia Violi (Ed.), Phonosymbolism and poetic language (pp.25–56). Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.Google Scholar
Watson, Richard L
(2001) A comparison of some Southeast Asian ideophones with some African ideophones. In Erhard F. K.Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones (pp. 385–405). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westbury, Chris
(2005) Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: Evidence from an interference task. Brain and Language, 931, 10–19. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wescott, Roger W
(1971) Linguistic iconism. Language, 471, 416–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Søren, Eric W. Holman, & Cecil H. Brown
(2010) Sound symbolism in basic vocabulary. Entropy, 121, 844–858. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 27 other publications

Boeckx, Cedric
2023. What made us “hunter-gatherers of words”. Frontiers in Neuroscience 17 DOI logo
Brown, Steven
2017. A Joint Prosodic Origin of Language and Music. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
Cohen, Dror, Ido Rosenberger, Moshe Butman & Kfir Bar
2023. Masking important information to assess the robustness of a multimodal classifier for emotion recognition. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 6 DOI logo
Ekström, Axel G., Jens Nirme & Peter Gärdenfors
2022. Motion iconicity in prosody. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Erben Johansson, Niklas, Andrey Anikin, Gerd Carling & Arthur Holmer
2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology 24:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud
2022. Iconic Associations Between Vowel Acoustics and Musical Patterns, and the Musical Protolanguage Hypothesis. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Fröhlich, Marlen, Christine Sievers, Simon W. Townsend, Thibaud Gruber & Carel P. van Schaik
2019. Multimodal communication and language origins: integrating gestures and vocalizations. Biological Reviews 94:5 ► pp. 1809 ff. DOI logo
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
2017. What the hands can tell us about language emergence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24:1 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Holler, Judith
2022. Visual bodily signals as core devices for coordinating minds in interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 377:1859 DOI logo
Kelly, Spencer D. & Quang‐Anh Ngo Tran
2023. Exploring the Emotional Functions of Co‐Speech Hand Gesture in Language and Communication. Topics in Cognitive Science DOI logo
Lister, Casey J. & Nicolas Fay
2017. How to create a human communication system. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Marino, David, Paul Bucci, Oliver S. Schneider & Karon E. MacLean
2017. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ► pp. 753 ff. DOI logo
Massaro, Dominic W. & Marcus Perlman
2017. Quantifying Iconicity’s Contribution during Language Acquisition: Implications for Vocabulary Learning. Frontiers in Communication 2 DOI logo
Odiegwu, Nancy Chiagolum & Jesús Romero-Trillo
2023. Gradience in iconicity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Perlman, Marcus
2017. Debunking two myths against vocal origins of language. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
Perlman, Marcus, Hannah Little, Bill Thompson & Robin L. Thompson
2018. Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Perlman, Marcus & Gary Lupyan
2018. People Can Create Iconic Vocalizations to Communicate Various Meanings to Naïve Listeners. Scientific Reports 8:1 DOI logo
Perry, Lynn K., Marcus Perlman, Bodo Winter, Dominic W. Massaro & Gary Lupyan
2018. Iconicity in the speech of children and adults. Developmental Science 21:3 DOI logo
Schlenker, Philippe
2018. Iconic pragmatics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:3 ► pp. 877 ff. DOI logo
Schlenker, Philippe
2018. Visible Meaning: Sign language and the foundations of semantics. Theoretical Linguistics 44:3-4 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Sidhu, David M. & Gabriella Vigliocco
2023. I don’t see what you’re saying: The maluma/takete effect does not depend on the visual appearance of phonemes as they are articulated. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 30:4 ► pp. 1521 ff. DOI logo
Sulik, Justin & Mitchell Rabinowitz
2018. Cognitive mechanisms for inferring the meaning of novel signals during symbolisation. PLOS ONE 13:1 ► pp. e0189540 ff. DOI logo
THOMPSON, BILL, MARCUS PERLMAN, GARY LUPYAN, ZED SEVCIKOVA SEHYR & KAREN EMMOREY
2020. A data-driven approach to the semantics of iconicity in American Sign Language and English. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 182 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo, Marcus Perlman, Lynn K. Perry & Gary Lupyan
2017. Which words are most iconic?. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 443 ff. DOI logo
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Sławomir Wacewicz & Casey Lister
2021. Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Chapter 18. Conclusion. In Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.