Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar
Editors
| Universität Hamburg
| Independent reseacher
| Universidad de Córdoba
Figurative language has been regarded traditionally as situated outside the realm of grammar. However, with the advent of Cognitive Linguistics, metonymy and metaphor are now recognized as being not only ornamental rhetorical tropes but fundamental figures of thought that shape, to a considerable extent, the conceptual structure of languages. The present volume goes even beyond this insight to propose that grammar itself is metonymical in nature (Langacker) and that conceptual metonymy and metaphor leave their imprints on lexicogrammatical structure. This thesis is developed and substantiated for a wide array of languages and lexicogrammatical phenomena, such as word class meaning and word formation, case and aspect, proper names and noun phrases, predicate and clause constructions, and other metonymically and metaphorically motivated grammatical meanings and forms. The volume should be of interest to scholars and students in cognitive and functional linguistics, in particular, conceptual metonymy and metaphor theory, cognitive typology, and pragmatics.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 25] 2009. xiii, 423 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Editors and contributors
|
ix–xi
|
|
Preface
|
xiii
|
|
1–44
|
|
|
45–71
|
|
|
Part 1. Word class meaning and word formation
|
73
|
|
75–97
|
|
|
99–109
|
|
|
111–144
|
|
|
Part 2. Case and aspect
|
145
|
|
147–175
|
|
|
177–195
|
|
|
Part 3. Proper names and noun phrases
|
197
|
|
199–228
|
|
|
229–257
|
|
|
259–274
|
|
|
Part 4. Predicate and clause constructions
|
275
|
|
277–290
|
|
|
291–322
|
|
|
323–336
|
|
|
Part 5. Metonymic and metaphoric motivations of grammatical meaning
|
337
|
|
339–361
|
|
|
363–401
|
|
|
Metonymy and metaphor index
|
403–406
|
|
Name index
|
407–413
|
|
Subject index
|
415–423
|
“Metaphor and metonymy are often thought of as lexical phenomena, a matter of words and how they are used. This book challenges this assumption and proposes that the grammar -- syntax and morphology -- reflect metaphorical and metonymic processes of conceptualization. It offers an exciting and innovative perspective on a variety of topics in a wide range of languages and is an important addition to the growing literature on the conceptual and functional basis of grammar.”
John Taylor
, University of Otago, New Zealand
“
Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar is a fascinating collection of thought-provoking chapters offering a new understanding of what we mean by grammar of natural languages. Grammar is not the solid, unassailable, hard rock that formal grammarians imagine it to be, and figurative devices like metonymy and metaphor are not the soft, slippery, and dangerous paths to be avoided at all costs. Instead, figurative devices like metonymy and metaphor infuse and permeate grammar, massively, and must be confronted at every turn. This volume argues eloquently and forcefully for this view of grammar, drawing upon a diverse array of languages and lexicogrammatical phenomena, including gender, case, compounds, tense, and a variety of construction types. I wholeheartedly recommend Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar to all linguists who are open to rethinking the basics of their discipline.”
John Newman , University of Alberta
“For a long time metonymy and metaphor were seen as ornaments to make language more varied and beautiful. With this volume edited by Panther, Thornburg, and Barcelona, we have moved as far as possible from this idea. The startling new insight of the book is that the huge complexity of linguistic structure depends, in large measure, on such natural, automatic, and hard-to-notice cognitive processes as metonymy and metaphor.”
Zoltán Kövecses, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
“The greatest value of this volume lies in the fact that it represents an integrated attempt at elucidating the extent and depth of how specifically metonymy and metaphor underlie conceptual structuring of grammar. Although the contributions reflect the diversity of possible approaches in identifying ways in which metonymy and metaphor, seen as conceptual phenomena, interact and influence lexicogrammatical structures, they are held together by a well-defined theoretical framework of Cognitive Linguistics, carefully explicated in the Introduction. This volume enriches our understanding of the conceptual make-up of lexicogrammatical structures and will definitely trigger further research into the complex mechanisms that hold between metonymy and metaphor in grammar.”
Milena Žic-Fuchs,University of Zagreb
Cited by
Cited by 31 other publications
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2014. Metaphors and metonymies for the (conceptualization and expression of the) state of no emotion in English and Greek.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff. 
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Pride.
International Journal of Language and Culture 4:1 ► pp. 6 ff.
Barcelona, Antonio, Olga Blanco Carrión & Rossella Pannain
2018.
In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60],
► pp. 1 ff.
Benczes, Réka
2015. “Cognitive Linguistics is fun”.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 479 ff.
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 126 ff.
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2017. On constructional blocking of metonymies.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 183 ff.
Chen, Rong
2019.
In Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese [Human Cognitive Processing, 67],
► pp. 207 ff.
David, Oana, George Lakoff & Elise Stickles
2016. Cascades in metaphor and grammar.
Constructions and Frames 8:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Denroche, Charles
2018. Text metaphtonymy.
Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Devylder, Simon
2019.
In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8],
► pp. 199 ff.
Dodge, Ellen K.
2016. A deep semantic corpus-based approach to metaphor analysis.
Constructions and Frames 8:2 ► pp. 256 ff.
Drożdż, Grzegorz
2016.
In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54],
► pp. 1 ff.
Ioannou, Georgios
2019. Metonymy and frame integration: Interfacing between concepts and discourse.
Topics in Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Lewin-Jones, Jenny & Mike Webb
2013. Ideology in Disguise: Place Name Metonyms and the Discourse of Newspaper Headlines.
Sociological Research Online 18:4 ► pp. 167 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2017. Embodied frames and scenes.
Gesture 16:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2019. Visuo-Kinetic Signs Are Inherently Metonymic: How Embodied Metonymy Motivates Forms, Functions, and Schematic Patterns in Gesture.
Frontiers in Psychology 10
Negro Alousque, Isabel
2020. The Metaphorical Representation of Brexit in Digital Political Cartoons.
Visual Communication Quarterly 27:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Paszenda, Joanna
2017.
In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58],
► pp. 241 ff.
Peng, Xinjia
2018. The emergence of a discourse construction in the internet.
Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 9:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Perak, Benedikt
2018.
In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60],
► pp. 205 ff.
Peña Cervel, M Sandra
2010. MacbethRevisited: A Cognitive Analysis.
Metaphor and Symbol 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Portero-Muñoz, Carmen
2018.
In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60],
► pp. 261 ff.
Rasulic, Katarina
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 200 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Ignasi Miró Sastre
2019. On the cognitive grounding of agent-deprofiling constructions as a case of pretense constructions.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 573 ff.
Sandford, Jodi L.
2014.
In Colour Studies,
► pp. 109 ff.
Slabakova, Roumyana, Jennifer Cabrelli Amaro & Sang Kyun Kang
2013. Regular and Novel Metonymy in Native Korean, Spanish, and English: Experimental Evidence for Various Acceptability.
Metaphor and Symbol 28:4 ► pp. 275 ff.
Slabakova, Roumyana, Jennifer Cabrelli Amaro & Sang Kyun Kang
2016. Regular and Novel Metonymy: Can You Curl up with a Good Agatha Christie in Your Second Language?.
Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Sweetser, Eve, Oana David & Elise Stickles
2019.
In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8],
► pp. 23 ff.
Velasco, Olga Isabel Díez
2012. Review of Benczes, Barcelona & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (2011): Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10:1 ► pp. 227 ff.
Viimaranta, Johanna & Arto Mustajoki
2020. What Can Science, Religion, Politics, Culture and the Economy Do? A Corpus Study of Metonymical Conceptualization Combined with Personification.
Scando-Slavica 66:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Zibin, Aseel, Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh & Elham T. Hussein
2020. On the comprehension of metonymical expressions by Arabic-speaking EFL learners: A cognitive linguistic approach.
Topics in Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General