Culture-specific concepts of emotionality and rationality
The cultural models of emotionality and rationality showing up in figurative language use vary extensively on a worldwide scale. Such variation is largely due to different cultural backgrounds, for instance, concerning underlying ethnomedical or philosophical beliefs. The present chapter reports on a research project involving various, partly unrelated languages and the different cultural models that underlie these cultures’ conceptualizations of emotions and of the mind. Three general categories of conceptualization (namely abdominocentrism, cardiocentrism, and cerebrocentrism) are distinguished and discussed. As an example from the category of cerebrocentrism, metaphorical and metonymic expressions referring to emotionality and rationality concepts in present-day English are analyzed in depth.
Cited by 3 other publications
Powell, Philip A, Kaisa Puustinen-Hopper, Martin de Jode, Panagiotis Mavros & Jennifer Roberts
. Heart versus head: Differential bodily feedback causally alters economic decision-making
. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
pp. 1949 ff.
Price, Elfed Huw
. Do brains think? Comparative anatomy and the end of the Great Chain of Being in 19th-century Britain
. History of the Human Sciences
pp. 32 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.