Article published in:
Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, culture, and cognition
Edited by Luna Filipović and Katarzyna M. Jaszczolt
[Human Cognitive Processing 37] 2012
► pp. 217249
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Beller, Sieghard, Judith Bohlen, Lisa Hüther & Andrea Bender
2016. Perspective taking in referring to objects behind versus in front of an observer: Frames of reference, intraindividual consistency, and response latencies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69:7  pp. 1384 ff. Crossref logo
Beller, Sieghard, Henrik Singmann, Lisa Hüther & Andrea Bender
2015. Turn around to have a look? Spatial referencing in dorsal vs. frontal settings in cross-linguistic comparison. Frontiers in Psychology 6 Crossref logo
Bender, Andrea, Sarah Teige‐Mocigemba, Annelie Rothe‐Wulf, Miriam Seel & Sieghard Beller
2020.  Being In Front Is Good—But Where Is In Front ? Preferences for Spatial Referencing Affect Evaluation . Cognitive Science 44:6 Crossref logo
Cooperrider, Kensy, James Slotta & Rafael Núñez
2017. Uphill and Downhill in a Flat World: The Conceptual Topography of the Yupno House. Cognitive Science 41:3  pp. 768 ff. Crossref logo
Hoffmann, Dorothea
2019. Restrictions on the Usage of Spatial Frames of Reference in Location and Orientation Descriptions: Evidence from Three Australian Languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
MOORE, KEVIN EZRA
2017. Elaborating time in space: the structure and function of space–motion metaphors of time. Language and Cognition 9:2  pp. 191 ff. Crossref logo
Wilke, Fiona, Andrea Bender & Sieghard Beller
2019. Flexibility in adopting relative frames of reference in dorsal and lateral settings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:10  pp. 2393 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.