Article published in:
Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy
Edited by Dylan Glynn and Justyna A. Robinson
[Human Cognitive Processing 43] 2014
► pp. 487533
References

References

Arnold, J., Wasow, Th., Losongco, A., & Ginstrom, R.
(2000) Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of complexity and information structure on constituent ordering. Language , 76, 28–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berkson, J.
(1944) Application of the logistic function to bio-assay. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 39, 357–365.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H., & Sankoff, D.
(1974) Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language , 50, 33–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D.R.
(1969)  The analysis of binary data . London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Fox, J.
(2003) Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software , 8(15), 1–27. Retrieved from <http://​www​.jstatsoft​.org​/v08​/i15​/>.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, S., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D.
(2002) Regressing on er. Statistical analysis of texts and language variation. In A. Morin, & P. Sébillot (Eds.), 6èmes journées internationales d’analyse statistique des données textuelles (pp. 335–346). Rennes: Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique.Google Scholar
Harrell, F.E.
(2001)  Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis . Berlin: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilbe, J.M.
(2009)  Logistic regression models . London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S.
(2000)  Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.E.
(2008) Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass , 3, 359–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keune, K., Ernestus, M., van Hout, R., & Baayen, H.
(2005) Social, geographical, and register variation in Dutch: From written mogelijk to spoken mok . Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory , 1, 183–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelder, J., & Wedderburn, R.
(1972) Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A , 135, 370–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oostdijk, N.
(2000) The spoken Dutch corpus: Overview and first evaluation. In S. Markantontou, S. Piperidis, & G. Stainhauoer (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international conference on language resources and evaluation (pp. 887–893). Athens: Institute for Language and Speech Processing.Google Scholar
Pampel, F.C.
(2000)  Logistic regression: A primer . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Paolillo, J.
(2002)  Analyzing linguistic variation: Statistical models and methods . Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D.
(1988) Variable rules. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, & K.J. Mathheier (Eds.), Berlin sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society , Vol. 2.(pp. 984–997). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D., Tagliamonte, S., & Smith, E.
(2005)  Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows . Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S.A.
(2006)  Analysing sociolinguistic variation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R.S.
(1994) A statistical analysis of English double object alternation. Issues in Applied Linguistics , 5, 37–58.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.B., & Worcester, J.
(1943) The determination of L. D. 50 and its sampling error in bio-assay. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 29, 257–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Nominal and Pronominal Address in Jamaica and Trinidad [Topics in Address Research, 3], Crossref logo
Claes, Jeroen
2017. Cognitive and geographic constraints on morphosyntactic variation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31  pp. 30 ff. Crossref logo
De Smet, Isabeau & Freek Van de Velde
2019. Reassessing the evolution of West Germanic preterite inflection. Diachronica 36:2  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Donaldson, Bryan
2017. Negation in Near-Native French: Variation and Sociolinguistic Competence. Language Learning 67:1  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Donaldson, Bryan
2020. Clitic position in Old Occitan affirmative verb-first declaratives coordinated by e . Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:3  pp. 389 ff. Crossref logo
FONTEYN, LAUREN & NIKKI VAN DE POL
2016. Divide and conquer: the formation and functional dynamics of the Modern English ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics 20:2  pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo
Franco, Karlien & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2020. New -way(s) with -ward(s): lexicalization, splitting and sociolinguistic patterns. Language Variation and Change 32:2  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Franco, Karlien & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2021. Interesting Fellow or Tough Old Bird?. American Speech 96:2  pp. 192 ff. Crossref logo
Granvik, Anton
2017. Accounting for syntactic variation in diachrony. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31  pp. 243 ff. Crossref logo
Heng, Tianyu, Dezhi Yang, Ruonan Wang, Li Zhang, Yang Lu & Guanhua Du
2021. Progress in Research on Artificial Intelligence Applied to Polymorphism and Cocrystal Prediction. ACS Omega 6:24  pp. 15543 ff. Crossref logo
Hirota, Harunobu
2021. The Indicative/subjunctive Mood Alternation with Adverbs of Doubt in Spanish. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
PIJPOPS, DIRK, DIRK SPEELMAN, STEFAN GRONDELAERS & FREEK VAN DE VELDE
2018. Comparing explanations for the Complexity Principle: evidence from argument realization. Language and Cognition 10:3  pp. 514 ff. Crossref logo
Tizón-Couto, David & David Lorenz
2021. Variables are valuable: making a case for deductive modeling. Linguistics 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.