Part of
Studies in Lexicogrammar: Theory and applications
Edited by Grzegorz Drożdż
[Human Cognitive Processing 54] 2016
► pp. 7592
References
Bergen, B
2012Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Castells, M
1996The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. I. Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castells, M., & Catterall, B
2001The making of the network society. London: Institute of Contemporary Arts.Google Scholar
Crocker, S
2001Into the interval: On Deleuze’s reversal of time and movement. Continental Philosophy Review, 34, 45–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W
2005Logical and typological arguments for radical construction grammar. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (273–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand
1966[1916]Course in general linguistics. Ch. Bally, A. Sechehaye, in collaboration with A. Riedlinger (Eds.), Transl. W. Baskin. New York & Toronto & London: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G
1988[1966]Bergsonism. Transl. H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
1994[1968]Difference and repetition. Transl. P. Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Echard, W
2006Sensible virtual selves: Bodies, instruments and the becoming-concrete of music. Contemporary Music Review, 25(1/2), 7–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esposito, J
2002Virtuality. In J. Queiroz & R. Gudwin (Eds.), Digital encyclopedia of Charles Peirce. [URL] (accessed January 15, 2014).Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of ‘let alone’. Language, 64(3), 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C
2011What is so special about embodied simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 512–519. DOI logo (accessed December 3, 2015)Google Scholar
Gaugusch, A
2001(Re)constructing (virtual) reality. In A. Riegler, M. Peschl, K. Edlinger, G. Fleck, & W. Feigl (Eds.), Virtual reality: Cognitive foundations, technological issues and philosophical implications (221–230). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Głaz, A., & Prorok, K
2014Of triangles, trapeziums and ethnolinguists. The linguistic worldview revisited. In M. Kuźniak, A. Libura, & M. Szawerna (Eds.), From conceptual metaphor theory to cognitive ethnolinguistics: Patterns of imagery in language (207–228). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A
1995Constructions: A Construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1961Categories of a theory of grammar. Word, 17(3), 242–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 On grammar . In J. Webster (Ed.), Collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Heger, K
1969L’analyse sémantique du signe linguistique. Langue française, 4, 44–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R
2007aLanguage networks: The new word grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007bWord grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (509–539) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keysers, C., Kohler, E, Umilta, M.A., Nanetti, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V
2003Audioviosual mirror neurons and action recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 628–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1993Reference point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999Virtual reality. In S.J. Hwang & A. Lommel (Eds.), LACUS forum XXV (41–69). Fullerton, CA: LACUS. [Reprinted in Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), 77–103.]Google Scholar
2005Two problems virtually resolved. In D. Stanulewicz, R. Kalisz, W. Kürschner, & C. Klaus (Eds.), De lingua et litteris: Studia in honorem Casimiri Andreae Sroka (65–70). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Culture and cognition, lexicon and grammar. In M. Yamaguchi, D. Tay, & B. Blount (Eds.), Approaches to language, culture, and cognition: The intersection of cognitive linguistics and linguistic anthropology (27–47). Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Łozowski, P
2002Deconstructing the world-view: From actuality to virtuality in cognitive linguistics. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & K. Turewicz (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics today (65–79). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Massumi, B
2002Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, C.K., & Richards, I.A
1923The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.Google Scholar
Ortiz, M.J., & Moya, J.A
2015The action cam phenomenon: A new trend in audiovisual production. Communication and Society, 28(3), 51–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Ch. S
1902Virtual. In J.M. Baldwin (Ed.), Dictionary of philosophy and psychology, Vol. 2 (763). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1998[1899]The first rule of logic. In The Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, Vol. 2 (1893–1913) (42–56). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z
1999Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M.-L
2001Narrative as virtual reality: Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Baltimore & London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Scotus, J.D
1975[1307]God and creatures: The quodlibetel questions. Transl. F. Alluntis & A.B. Wolter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, B
1999Aspects of referential metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (121–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiedermann, J
2003Mirror neurons, embodied cognitive agents and imitation learning. Computing and Informatics, 22, 545–559.Google Scholar
Wright, B
2004The reality of the virtual. Film. Olive film opus.Google Scholar
Zabel, G
2014Through the looking glass: Philosophical reflections on the art of virtual worlds. In M. Grimshaw (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of virtuality (407–419). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar