Cover not available
Part of
How Grammar Links Concepts: Verb-mediated constructions, attribution, perspectivizing
Friedrich Ungerer
[Human Cognitive Processing 57] 2017
► pp. 309–316

References

Aarts, Bas
2011 Oxford modern English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1996 I think an English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (Eds.), Modality in Germanic languages (1–47). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015 What I mean is – what is it doing in conversational interaction? The European English Messenger, 24, 29–36.Google Scholar
Allerton, D. A
1982 Valency and the English verb. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ambridge, Ben, & Goldberg, Adele E
2008 The island status of clausal complements: evidence in favor of an information structure explanation. Cognitive Linguistics, 29, 357–389.Google Scholar
Austin, Keith, Theakston, Anna, Lieven, Elena, & Tomasello, Michael
2014 Young children’s understanding of denial. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2061–2070. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bannard, Colin, Lieven, Elena, & Tomasello, Michael
2009 Modeling children's early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (41), 17284-17289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, E
1880 Über die doppelformigen englischen Adjectiv-Adverbien. Archiv für das Studium der Neueren Sprachen und Literaturen, 64, 25–70.Google Scholar
Behrens, Heike
2001 Cognitive-conceptual development and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In Melissa Bowerman & Steven Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (450-474). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencini, Giulia M. L., & Goldberg, Adele E
2000 The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 640–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin, & Chang, Nancy
2013 Embodied construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (168–190).Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finnegan, Edward
1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Binneck, Robert
(Ed.) 2012 The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Lois
1973 One word at a time: The use of single-word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C
2013 Cognitive construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (233–252).Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper, & Harder, Peter
2007 Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language, 31, 569–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braine, Martin D
1976 Children’s first word combinations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brand, Christiane, & Götz, Sandra
2011 Fluency versus accuracy in advanced spoken learner language: A multi-method approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16 (2), 255-275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, & Nikitina, Tatiana
2003 On the gradience of the dative alternation. Draft of May 7 2003.Google Scholar
Broccias, Christano
2013 Cognitive grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (191–210).Google Scholar
Brown, Roger
1973 A first language: The early years. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Lieven, Elena, & Theakston, Anna
2007 What part of no do children not understand? A usage-based account of multiword-negation. Journal of Child Language, 33, 251–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald, & McCarthy, Michael
2006 Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965 Aspects of the theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., & Clark, Eve V
1977 Psychology and language: An introduction into psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt College Publications.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1985 Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 Language universals and linguistic typology. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2013 Radical construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (191–232).Google Scholar
Croft, William, & Cruse, D. Alan
2004 Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, Ewa
2000 From formula to schema: The acquisition of English questions. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 83–102.Google Scholar
2008 Questions with long-distance dependencies. A usage-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 391–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Functional constraints, usage, and mental grammars: A study of speakers’ intuitions about questions with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics, 24, 633–665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2010 Typology of negation. In Horn (9–38).Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen, & Velupillai, Viveka
2013 Tense and Aspect. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
Daneš, Frantisek
1974 Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Frantisek Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (106–128). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Deane, Paul
1996 Neurological evidence for a cognitive theory of syntax. In Eugene H. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics in the redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm (55–116). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2004 The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Construction grammar and first language acquisition. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (347–363).Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger, & Tomasello, Michael
2001 The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics,12: 1-45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, Christine
2010 The acquisition of negation. In Horn (39–73).Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W
2005 A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, Ellen, & Lakoff, George
2005 On The Neural Basis of Image Schemas. In Hampe & Grade (57–92).Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S
1988 Object-verb order and adjective-noun order: Dispelling a myth. Lingua, 74, 77–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of adjective and noun. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
2013b Order of adjective and noun. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
2013c Order of genitive and noun. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
2013d Order of adposition and noun phrase. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
2013e Order of degree word and adjective. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
2013f Order of negative morpheme and verb. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
2013g Position of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S., & Haspelmath, Martin
(Eds.) 2013 The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL]. Accessed December 30, 2015.Google Scholar
Evans, Vvyan
2014 The language myth. Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, & Green, Melanie
2006 Cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline, & Krifka, Manfred
2008 Information structure. Notional distinctions, ways of expression. In Piet van Sterkenburg (Ed.), Unity and diversity of languages (123-135). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J
1968 The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Quoted after The case for case, [URL]. Accessed December 30, 2015.Google Scholar
2013 Berkeley construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (111–132).Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul, & O’Connor, Mary Catherine
1988 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions. The case of let alone. Language, 64, 508–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1992 Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2003 The development of the modals in English: Radical versus gradual changes. In David Hart (Ed.), English modality in context. Diachronic perspectives (16–32). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W
2005 The psychological status of image schemas. In Hampe & Grady (113–136). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, David
2013 Genitives, adjectives and relative clauses. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
Gleason, Henry Allan
1961 An introduction to descriptive linguistics. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E
1995 Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003 Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013 Constructionist approaches. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (15–31).Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, & Alibali, Martha
2013 Gesture’s role in learning and development. In Philip Zelazo (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, Roberta M., & Hirsh-Pase, Kathy
1999 Accessed through [URL]. Accessed December 30, 2015.
Grady, Joseph E
2005 Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In Hampe & Grady (35–56). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney
1969 Studies in English adverbial usage. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
1966 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language. 2nd ed. (73–113). Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2003 Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Data in construction grammar. In Hoffmann, & Trousdale (93–108). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeannette K., Hedberg, Nancy, & Zacharias, Ron
1993 Cognitive status and form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gülzow, Insa
2003 Early development of verb morphology in an English-speaking child. In Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang U. Dressler, & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (Eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition. A cross-linguistic perspective (43–88). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., & Hasan, Ruqayia
1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K
1994 An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate
2005 Introduction. In Hampe & Grady (i–x). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, Beate, & Grady, Joseph E
(Eds.) 2005 From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A
1983 Word order universals. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hayase, Naoko
2011 The cognitive motivation for the use of dangling participles in English. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and lexicon (89–105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The motivation for using English suspended dangling participles: A usage-based development of (inter)subjectivity. In Evie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengen (Eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change (117-145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania, & Long, Haiping
2013 An outline of discourse grammar. In Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jenny (Eds.), Reflections on functionalism in linguistics (155–206). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, Heath, David, Roe, Ian F., & Götz, Dieter
2004 A valency dictionary of English. A corpus-based analysis of the complementation patterns of English verbs, nouns and adjectives. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, & Schüller, Susen
2008 Introduction to syntactic analysis: a valency approach. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Hoad, T. F
2003 The concise Oxford dictionary of English etymology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas, & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Construction grammar: Introduction. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (1–12).Google Scholar
(Eds.) 2013 The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Lawrence
1989 A natural history of negation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) 2010 The expression of negation. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, & Pullum, Geoffrey K
2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2007 English mediopassive constructions. A cognitive, corpus-based study of their origin, spread and current status. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Iggesen, Oliver A
2013 Number of cases. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2015 A multiple grammar model of speakers’ linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Linguistics, 26, 161–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Roy
2009 Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavil Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (105–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1933 The essentials of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jesperson, Otto
1924 The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987 The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunter
2011 Explaining diverging evidence. The case of clause-initial I think. In Doris Schönefeld (Ed.), Converging evidence. Methodological and theoretical issues for linguistic research (81–112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd, & Kuteva, Tania
2011 On Thetical grammar. Studies in Language, 35, 852–897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, & Kiparsky, Carol
1971 Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch & Erich Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in Linguistics (143–173). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, Minna, Theakston, Anna, Lieven, Elena, & Tomasello, Michael
2009 ‘I want hold Postman Pat’: An investigation into the acquisition of infinitival marker ‘to’. First Language, 29, 313–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward S., & Bellugi, Usula
1966 Syntactic regularity in the speech of children. In John Lyons & Roger J. Wales (Eds.), Psycholinguistic papers (183–208). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans, & Meid, Wolfgang
1969 Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. Vol. 2: Formenlehre. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd
1991 Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation problems of control and interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kowalski, Alix, & Yan, Charles
2012 Verb islands in adult and child language. BUCLD Proceedings from the 2011 meeting . Prefinal version.
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1976 Semantic Representations and the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Foundations of Language, 14, 307–357.Google Scholar
1987/1991 Foundations of cognitive grammar. 2 vols. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langendonck, Willy Van
2007 Iconicity. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (394–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P
1973 A structural principle of language and its implications. Language, 49, 47–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2011 A focus on adverbial connectors: Connecting, partitioning, and focusing attention in the history of English. In Anneli Meurman-Soli & Ursula Lenker (Eds.), Connectives in synchrony and diachrony in European languages. Helsinki: VARIENG.Google Scholar
2014 Knitting and splitting information. Medial placement of linking adverbials in the history of English. In Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt, & Daniel Schreier (Eds.), Contact, variation and change in the history of English (11–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra
1976 Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (457–489). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lieven, Elena
2015 First language learning from a usage-based approach. In Schmid (1–24).Google Scholar
Lieven, Elena, Pine, J., & Baldwin, G
1997 Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24, 187–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian
1975 Pragmatic patterns in child syntax. Stanford Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 10, 153–165.Google Scholar
2015 Item-based patterns in early syntactic development. In Schmid (25–61).Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean M., & Canovas, Cristobal Pagan
2014 On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition, 12, 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura
2003 Word meaning, sentence meaning, and syntactic meaning. In Hubert Cuykens, René Dirven, & John R. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics (93–122). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A
2013 Sign-based construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (133–132).Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2008 Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Subtypes of asymmetric standard negation. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce
1985 Old English syntax. 2 vols. Oxford. Clarenden. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R
1986 Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patten, Amanda
2012 The English it-cleft. A constructional account and a diachronic investigation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F
1978 A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language, 54, 883–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan
1972 A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter
1992 The cognitive approach to natural language. In Martin Pütz (Ed.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution (513–541). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 The metaphor TIME AS SPACE across languages. In Nicole Baumgarten, Claudia Böttger, Markus Motz, & Julia Probst (Eds.), Übersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung – das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen. Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag (225–238). Bochum: AKS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter, & Panther, Klaus-Uwe
2004 Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In Radden, & Panther (1–46).Google Scholar
(Eds.) 2004 Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter, & Dirven, René
2007 Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
1988 Transformational grammar. A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Minimalist syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roget, Peter Mark
1982 Roget’s Thesaurus. Ed. by Susan M. Lloyd. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rochat, Philippe
2013 Self-conceptualizing in development. In Philip Zelazo (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press,Google Scholar
Rohrer, Tim
2005 Image schemata in the brain. In Hampe & Grady (165–196). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M
2012 The Modular Architecture of Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1988 Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2007 Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (117–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) 2015 Entrenchment, memory and automaticity. The psychology of linguistic knowledge and language learning. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John H
1991 Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Robin
1995 Logic. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, & Wilson, Deirdre
1995 Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, & Rohde, Ada
2004 The goal bias in the encoding of emotion events. In Radden & Panther (249–268).Google Scholar
Swan, Toril
1982 A note on the scope(s) of sadly. Studia Linguistica 36, 121-130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1975 Semantics and syntax of motion. In John P. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 4 (181–238). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2000 Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R
2002 Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A
2002 “Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26, 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2000 First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 61–82.Google Scholar
2003 Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
2006 Acquiring linguistic constructions. In William Damon, Richard M. Lerner, Deanna Kuhn, & Robert S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. 2. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
2008 The origins of human communication. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich
1980 Zur Auswahl des Beispielmaterials in Schulgrammatiken. Der Fremdsprachliche Unterricht, 14, 103–114.Google Scholar
1988 Syntax der englischen Adverbialen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Englische Grammatik heute. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
2001 Basicness and conceptual hierarchies in foreign language learning. A corpus-based study. In Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier, & René Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics. Vol. 2: Language pedagogy (201–222). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in preparation). Towards a concept-linking grammar of German. Verb-second position and the competition between word order principles.
Ungerer, Friedrich, G. E. H. Meier, K. Schäfer, & S. Lechler
1981 A grammar of present-day English. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich, & Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2006 An introduction to cognitive linguistics. 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie
2011 I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics, 49, 295–332.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
1975 Analogy in generative grammar: the origin of word order. In Luigi Heilmann (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Linguists. Vol. 2 (79–83). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar