Aarts, Bas. 2011. Oxford modern English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 1996. I think an English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (Eds.), Modality in Germanic languages (1–47). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2015. What I mean is – what is it doing in conversational interaction? The European English Messenger, 24, 29–36.Google Scholar
Allerton, D. A. 1982. Valency and the English verb. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ambridge, Ben, & Goldberg, Adele E. 2008. The island status of clausal complements: evidence in favor of an information structure explanation. Cognitive Linguistics, 29, 357–389.Google Scholar
Austin, Keith, Theakston, Anna, Lieven, Elena, & Tomasello, Michael. 2014. Young children’s understanding of denial. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2061–2070. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bannard, Colin, Lieven, Elena, & Tomasello, Michael. 2009. Modeling children's early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (41), 17284-17289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, E. 1880. Über die doppelformigen englischen Adjectiv-Adverbien. Archiv für das Studium der Neueren Sprachen und Literaturen, 64, 25–70.Google Scholar
Behrens, Heike. 2001. Cognitive-conceptual development and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In Melissa Bowerman & Steven Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (450-474). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencini, Giulia M. L., & Goldberg, Adele E. 2000. The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 640–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin, & Chang, Nancy. 2013. Embodied construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (168–190).Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finnegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Binneck, Robert (Ed.). 2012. The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Lois. 1973. One word at a time: The use of single-word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C. 2013. Cognitive construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (233–252).Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper, & Harder, Peter. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language, 31, 569–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braine, Martin D. 1976. Children’s first word combinations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brand, Christiane, & Götz, Sandra. 2011. Fluency versus accuracy in advanced spoken learner language: A multi-method approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16 (2), 255-275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, & Nikitina, Tatiana. 2003. On the gradience of the dative alternation. Draft of May 7, 2003.Google Scholar
Broccias, Christano. 2013. Cognitive grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (191–210).Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early years. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Lieven, Elena, & Theakston, Anna. 2007. What part of no do children not understand? A usage-based account of multiword-negation. Journal of Child Language, 33, 251–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald, & McCarthy, Michael. 2006. Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., & Clark, Eve V. 1977. Psychology and language: An introduction into psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt College Publications.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2013. Radical construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (191–232).Google Scholar
Croft, William, & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, Ewa. 2000. From formula to schema: The acquisition of English questions. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 83–102.Google Scholar
. 2008. Questions with long-distance dependencies. A usage-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 391–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Functional constraints, usage, and mental grammars: A study of speakers’ intuitions about questions with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics, 24, 633–665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2010. Typology of negation. In Horn (9–38).Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen, & Velupillai, Viveka. 2013. Tense and Aspect. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
Daneš, Frantisek. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Frantisek Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (106–128). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Deane, Paul. 1996. Neurological evidence for a cognitive theory of syntax. In Eugene H. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics in the redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm (55–116). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2004. The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Construction grammar and first language acquisition. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (347–363).Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger, & Tomasello, Michael. 2001. The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics,12: 1-45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, Christine. 2010. The acquisition of negation. In Horn (39–73).Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2005. A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, Ellen, & Lakoff, George. 2005. On The Neural Basis of Image Schemas. In Hampe & Grade (57–92).Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1988. Object-verb order and adjective-noun order: Dispelling a myth. Lingua, 74, 77–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of adjective and noun. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Order of adjective and noun. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
. 2013c. Order of genitive and noun. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
. 2013d. Order of adposition and noun phrase. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
. 2013e. Order of degree word and adjective. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
. 2013f. Order of negative morpheme and verb. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
. 2013g. Position of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S., & Haspelmath, Martin (Eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL]. Accessed December 30, 2015.Google Scholar
Evans, Vvyan. 2014. The language myth. Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, & Green, Melanie. 2006. Cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline, & Krifka, Manfred. 2008. Information structure. Notional distinctions, ways of expression. In Piet van Sterkenburg (Ed.), Unity and diversity of languages (123-135). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Quoted after The case for case, [URL]. Accessed December 30, 2015.Google Scholar
. 2013. Berkeley construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (111–132).Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul, & O’Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions. The case of let alone. Language, 64, 508–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2003. The development of the modals in English: Radical versus gradual changes. In David Hart (Ed.), English modality in context. Diachronic perspectives (16–32). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. 2005. The psychological status of image schemas. In Hampe & Grady (113–136). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, David. 2013. Genitives, adjectives and relative clauses. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
Gleason, Henry Allan. 1961. An introduction to descriptive linguistics. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. Constructionist approaches. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (15–31).Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, & Alibali, Martha. 2013. Gesture’s role in learning and development. In Philip Zelazo (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, Roberta M., & Hirsh-Pase, Kathy 1999. Accessed through [URL]. Accessed December 30, 2015.
Grady, Joseph E. 2005. Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In Hampe & Grady (35–56). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English adverbial usage. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language. 2nd ed. (73–113). Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Data in construction grammar. In Hoffmann, & Trousdale (93–108). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeannette K., Hedberg, Nancy, & Zacharias, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gülzow, Insa. 2003. Early development of verb morphology in an English-speaking child. In Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang U. Dressler, & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (Eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition. A cross-linguistic perspective (43–88). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., & Hasan, Ruqayia. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate. 2005. Introduction. In Hampe & Grady (i–x). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, Beate, & Grady, Joseph E. (Eds.). 2005. From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hayase, Naoko. 2011. The cognitive motivation for the use of dangling participles in English. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and lexicon (89–105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The motivation for using English suspended dangling participles: A usage-based development of (inter)subjectivity. In Evie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengen (Eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change (117-145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania, & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of discourse grammar. In Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jenny (Eds.), Reflections on functionalism in linguistics (155–206). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, Heath, David, Roe, Ian F., & Götz, Dieter. 2004. A valency dictionary of English. A corpus-based analysis of the complementation patterns of English verbs, nouns and adjectives. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, & Schüller, Susen. 2008. Introduction to syntactic analysis: a valency approach. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Hoad, T. F. 2003. The concise Oxford dictionary of English etymology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas, & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Construction grammar: Introduction. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (1–12).Google Scholar
(Eds.). 2013. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Lawrence. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.). 2010. The expression of negation. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2007. English mediopassive constructions. A cognitive, corpus-based study of their origin, spread and current status. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Iggesen, Oliver A. 2013. Number of cases. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2015. A multiple grammar model of speakers’ linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Linguistics, 26, 161–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Roy. 2009. Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavil Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (105–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto, 1933. The essentials of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jesperson, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunter. 2011. Explaining diverging evidence. The case of clause-initial I think. In Doris Schönefeld (Ed.), Converging evidence. Methodological and theoretical issues for linguistic research (81–112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd, & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On Thetical grammar. Studies in Language, 35, 852–897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, & Kiparsky, Carol. 1971. Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch & Erich Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in Linguistics (143–173). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, Minna, Theakston, Anna, Lieven, Elena, & Tomasello, Michael. 2009. ‘I want hold Postman Pat’: An investigation into the acquisition of infinitival marker ‘to’. First Language, 29, 313–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward S., & Bellugi, Usula. 1966. Syntactic regularity in the speech of children. In John Lyons & Roger J. Wales (Eds.), Psycholinguistic papers (183–208). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans, & Meid, Wolfgang. 1969. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. Vol. 2: Formenlehre. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation problems of control and interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kowalski, Alix, & Yan, Charles. 2012. Verb islands in adult and child language. BUCLD Proceedings from the 2011 meeting . Prefinal version.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1976. Semantic Representations and the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Foundations of Language, 14, 307–357.Google Scholar
. 1987/1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar. 2 vols. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langendonck, Willy Van. 2007. Iconicity. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (394–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1973. A structural principle of language and its implications. Language, 49, 47–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2011. A focus on adverbial connectors: Connecting, partitioning, and focusing attention in the history of English. In Anneli Meurman-Soli & Ursula Lenker (Eds.), Connectives in synchrony and diachrony in European languages. Helsinki: VARIENG.Google Scholar
. 2014. Knitting and splitting information. Medial placement of linking adverbials in the history of English. In Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt, & Daniel Schreier (Eds.), Contact, variation and change in the history of English (11–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (457–489). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lieven, Elena. 2015. First language learning from a usage-based approach. In Schmid (1–24).Google Scholar
Lieven, Elena, Pine, J., & Baldwin, G. 1997. Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24, 187–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1975. Pragmatic patterns in child syntax. Stanford Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 10, 153–165.Google Scholar
. 2015. Item-based patterns in early syntactic development. In Schmid (25–61).Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean M., & Canovas, Cristobal Pagan. 2014. On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition, 12, 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura. 2003. Word meaning, sentence meaning, and syntactic meaning. In Hubert Cuykens, René Dirven, & John R. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics (93–122). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 2013. Sign-based construction grammar. In Hoffmann & Trousdale (133–132).Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2008. Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Subtypes of asymmetric standard negation. In Dryer & Haspelmath.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax. 2 vols. Oxford. Clarenden. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patten, Amanda. 2012. The English it-cleft. A constructional account and a diachronic investigation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1978. A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language, 54, 883–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter. 1992. The cognitive approach to natural language. In Martin Pütz (Ed.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution (513–541). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The metaphor TIME AS SPACE across languages. In Nicole Baumgarten, Claudia Böttger, Markus Motz, & Julia Probst (Eds.), Übersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung – das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen. Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag (225–238). Bochum: AKS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter, & Panther, Klaus-Uwe. 2004. Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In Radden, & Panther (1–46).Google Scholar
(Eds.) 2004. Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter, & Dirven, René. 2007. Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational grammar. A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Minimalist syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roget, Peter Mark. 1982. Roget’s Thesaurus. Ed. by Susan M. Lloyd. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rochat, Philippe. 2013. Self-conceptualizing in development. In Philip Zelazo (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press,Google Scholar
Rohrer, Tim. 2005. Image schemata in the brain. In Hampe & Grady (165–196). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 2012. The Modular Architecture of Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1988. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2007. Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (117–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.). 2015. Entrenchment, memory and automaticity. The psychology of linguistic knowledge and language learning. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John H. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Robin. 1995. Logic. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, & Wilson, Deirdre. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, & Rohde, Ada. 2004. The goal bias in the encoding of emotion events. In Radden & Panther (249–268).Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1982. A note on the scope(s) of sadly. Studia Linguistica 36, 121-130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1975. Semantics and syntax of motion. In John P. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 4 (181–238). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 2002. Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. “Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26, 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2000. First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 61–82.Google Scholar
. 2003. Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
2006. Acquiring linguistic constructions. In William Damon, Richard M. Lerner, Deanna Kuhn, & Robert S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. 2. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
2008. The origins of human communication. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich. 1980. Zur Auswahl des Beispielmaterials in Schulgrammatiken. Der Fremdsprachliche Unterricht, 14, 103–114.Google Scholar
. 1988. Syntax der englischen Adverbialen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Englische Grammatik heute. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
. 2001. Basicness and conceptual hierarchies in foreign language learning. A corpus-based study. In Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier, & René Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics. Vol. 2: Language pedagogy (201–222). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (in preparation). Towards a concept-linking grammar of German. Verb-second position and the competition between word order principles.
Ungerer, Friedrich, G. E. H. Meier, K. Schäfer, & S. Lechler. 1981. A grammar of present-day English. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich, & Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2011. I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics, 49, 295–332.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1975. Analogy in generative grammar: the origin of word order. In Luigi Heilmann (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Linguists. Vol. 2 (79–83). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar